Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Have cameras become too smart
Page <prev 2 of 11 next> last>>
Dec 31, 2019 18:05:01   #
Ltgk20 Loc: Salisbury, NC
 
I like the automation. It frees me up to focus on the other aspects of photography. It also allows me to capture things I could not otherwise capture. If we dispense with automation then we're using film without auto-wiinders, without light meters, without windows in the back to remind us of the film asa, without auto focus, etc.

Reply
Dec 31, 2019 18:15:07   #
Leinik Loc: Rochester NY
 
The issue may not be whether the cameras are getting smarter, but whether the users are getting dumber (because more numerous, less experienced, less likely to learn the basics of image-taking) by having their choices and creativity taken away from them by the technology, or rather because the camera-users (note I did not use "photographers") chose to let the technology make these choices for them. A really "smart" camera is one that also allows the user to make all the choices (exposure, focus, color balance,... and composition (soon to be automated I bet)) and whose technology can take over when those decisions are not so crucial for the result or because the user is not experienced/knowledgeable enough to make the right decisions for the right time/subject/intention. As far as I am concerned as long as I can still control every decision leading to the final image when I need to I do not mind that my cameras get smarter... because the problem is not cameras getting smarter ;o)

Reply
Dec 31, 2019 18:16:48   #
Leinik Loc: Rochester NY
 
PS Ltgk20, I am not sure that using a light meter or a reminder of what medium is in the camera qualify for automation.

Reply
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Dec 31, 2019 18:17:42   #
Leinik Loc: Rochester NY
 
Yes!!!

Reply
Dec 31, 2019 18:19:16   #
Leinik Loc: Rochester NY
 
PS2 the above "yes" was for Wingpilot's sensible post.

Reply
Dec 31, 2019 18:33:59   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Every camera with a Professional Mode option available since the mid 70s has rivaled, if no exceeded, the smarts of the human.

Reply
Dec 31, 2019 19:09:54   #
Vietnam Vet
 
I miss the days where the only option was fully manual and you chose your film speed by which roll of film you loaded. the only think I don't miss about it was the $1.50 it cost every time you clicked the shutter.

Reply
 
 
Dec 31, 2019 20:16:01   #
LFingar Loc: Claverack, NY
 
This reminds me of that tired old question: Why does my camera have video capability when I never do video?
I can't think of any automatic feature on my camera that I can't turn off if I want to, so, what's the problem?

Reply
Dec 31, 2019 20:43:50   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
JoeJoe wrote:
I was out with a friend at the weekend and the discussion turned to have cameras become so smart that the photographer has now become less of a factor??

His motivator for this was the purchase of a new camera which he says eye tracks his subject taking away 98% of the skill and now leaving him to just wait for the decisive moment to press the button.....

He also stated a relative newbie in photography can now get the same results as a seasoned Pro with all the help / aides switched on.... so why would you want to come out of all the auto aides...

If asked a few years ago I would say the Photographer is the important factor... After this weekend and seeing his new camera in action I'm resigned to now agree with him...
I was out with a friend at the weekend and the dis... (show quote)


No, cameras continue to improve, evolving with every new model to provide cool stuff and sometimes useful stuff. What you are seeing is a divergence - photographers seem to be devolving - regressing to a less advanced state . . .

Reply
Dec 31, 2019 22:02:31   #
User ID
 
The saxophone is possibly
the easiest instrument to
learn to play ....... badly !

Reply
Dec 31, 2019 22:05:57   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
User ID wrote:
The saxophone is possibly
the easiest instrument to
learn to play ....... badly !


Reply
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Dec 31, 2019 22:07:15   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
When you become one with your camera, the magic begins.

Reply
Dec 31, 2019 22:07:57   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
When you become one with your camera, the magic begins.


Reply
Dec 31, 2019 23:06:41   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
When you become one with your camera, the magic begins.


Yessir, well said.

Reply
Jan 1, 2020 00:22:42   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
JoeJoe wrote:
I was out with a friend at the weekend and the discussion turned to have cameras become so smart that the photographer has now become less of a factor??

His motivator for this was the purchase of a new camera which he says eye tracks his subject taking away 98% of the skill and now leaving him to just wait for the decisive moment to press the button.....

He also stated a relative newbie in photography can now get the same results as a seasoned Pro with all the help / aides switched on.... so why would you want to come out of all the auto aides...

If asked a few years ago I would say the Photographer is the important factor... After this weekend and seeing his new camera in action I'm resigned to now agree with him...
I was out with a friend at the weekend and the dis... (show quote)


So now we can make technically perfect, but subjectively empty photos, effortlessly. So what?

Folks, do you TAKE or MAKE your images? The answer is what separates cameras from people and tools from their users.

As capable as our cameras are, they still don’t have *mental* vision. You can change minds, record history, teach, accuse, amaze future generations who look back, inspire, make people think or feel, and so much more.

Or... you can randomly point and click...

In the 1980s, when I worked for a yearbook printer, we noted that camera automation nearly ruined yearbook candid photography, because student users SURRENDERED to it. While automation is far advanced from those days, it is still too stupid to do the whole job.

Cameras are tools. They aren’t yet sentient robots. We still need to THINK, react, make our compositions, control light, and pick our moments.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.