Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Functionality Between DSLR and Mirror-less Cameras
Page <<first <prev 10 of 13 next> last>>
Dec 13, 2019 12:27:25   #
dasgeiss
 
dennis2146 wrote:
If you are talking to me then you are welcome. If you click on Quote Reply before answering then your reply goes directly to the person you are talking to. Otherwise we have no idea who is talking to who.

Dennis


Thanks again, Dennis! I thought "Reply" went to the person over it. Learn something new every day!

Reply
Dec 13, 2019 12:34:10   #
Ched49 Loc: Pittsburgh, Pa.
 
I don't believe mirror slap in a DSLR causes little of any vibration in the camera. Look at the pro sports cameras like the D5 or Canon's 1DX, if there was any vibration, what professional would be using them?

Reply
Dec 13, 2019 12:46:47   #
joncogar Loc: WV
 
One expensive drawback to mirrorless
cameras the sensor is exposed during lens changes. Dirt on the sensor is a bad thing

https://www.jmpeltier.com/disadvantages-of-mirrorless-cameras/

Reply
 
 
Dec 13, 2019 12:49:03   #
Bill P
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Wow, you are so full of yourself. How superior you are! We should all bow down to you. You talk a good game.

Then you post those crappy pics. You’re trolling us...right?
Wow, you are so full of yourself. How superior yo... (show quote)


Whatever you think of his photos (I think some are good and others are execrable) I must question haow you can make this statement. He has taken the time to earn an advanced art degree. Have you? do you not value an education?

Reply
Dec 13, 2019 12:57:45   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Bill, I'm not going to denigrate anyone in particular. I am going to take issue with your statement regarding advanced degrees in anything. One needs to understand how the, at least, modern colleges work with post-grad degrees. If one gets into a post-grad program, good grades are going to happen. It's more a benefit to the school for that to happen than the student's. A friend of mine is an advisor for post-grad work at a large university. The conversational information he's revealed can be surprising.
--Bob

Bill P wrote:
Whatever you think of his photos (I think some are good and others are execrable) I must question haow you can make this statement. He has taken the time to earn an advanced art degree. Have you? do you not value an education?

Reply
Dec 13, 2019 13:05:26   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
dasgeiss wrote:
Thanks again, Dennis! I thought "Reply" went to the person over it. Learn something new every day!


You are welcome. Quote Reply is one of the best tools for UHH users.

Dennis

Reply
Dec 13, 2019 13:13:30   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
stevenwille wrote:
A good friend and I both use D500 cameras. He bought a mirrorless camera in addition. I did not. I do commercial and wedding photography. I want a very bright viewfinder where I can see people's faces clearly so I can get the right shot. He does landscape photography and wanted something lighter in weight. I would not want a mirrorless camera for action photography, but I can understand why landscape photographers would want them. Either way, the Nikon camera raw given both of he the latitude that we need for our work.
A good friend and I both use D500 cameras. He bou... (show quote)


Steven!?!?!
What are you doing??? Saying something balanced and rational in this thread is unheard of!

Reply
 
 
Dec 13, 2019 13:20:09   #
dasgeiss
 
Ched49 wrote:
I don't believe mirror slap in a DSLR causes little of any vibration in the camera. Look at the pro sports cameras like the D5 or Canon's 1DX, if there was any vibration, what professional would be using them?


That's what I am saying also. We have all seen some of the most beautiful photos coming out of DSLRs. Maybe with a high powered microscope one could see a difference but who would do that and what for? I think it is the person behind the camera that makes the most difference. A Professional Photographer I have communicated with in the past took a photo that was just beautiful. It was a photo of a row of houses on the opposite bank of a river at sundown. Just perfect in every detail as I could see so I asked him what camera he used, etc. He said he used his iPhone because he didn't have his regular equipment with him at the time. I was blown away!

Reply
Dec 13, 2019 14:30:09   #
Retina Loc: Near Charleston,SC
 
Ched49 wrote:
I don't believe mirror slap in a DSLR causes little of any vibration in the camera. Look at the pro sports cameras like the D5 or Canon's 1DX, if there was any vibration, what professional would be using them?

You are totally correct given the context. These are heavy cameras. Mirror vibration is heavily damped by the mass of the camera attached to fast, long, heavy lenses. Even though some pros select from hundreds of frames before submitting to their editors, I would expect none are ever rejected due to mirror shake.

My car was totaled last year by a large buck sprinting, I presume, from a wildlife photographer he mistook for a hunter with a cannon. Had it run into a freight train I doubt the engineer would have felt a thing. Recall that acceleration=Force/mass.

Attached to pro sports lenses, mirrors are tiny and nearly weightless, so shutter blur is practically non-existent. Stabilization on these systems is probably more important for nature work at dusk and dawn, for investigators, and photojournalists where the lighting can be a challenge and every bit helps. Even then, it is more likely needed for human movement when hand held with long exposures more than for the mirror mechanism.

Reply
Dec 13, 2019 14:32:43   #
Bill P
 
rmalarz wrote:
Bill, I'm not going to denigrate anyone in particular. I am going to take issue with your statement regarding advanced degrees in anything. One needs to understand how the, at least, modern colleges work with post-grad degrees. If one gets into a post-grad program, good grades are going to happen. It's more a benefit to the school for that to happen than the student's. A friend of mine is an advisor for post-grad work at a large university. The conversational information he's revealed can be surprising.
--Bob
Bill, I'm not going to denigrate anyone in particu... (show quote)


As a grad school dropout, I certainly understand how things go. And I think your feeling may well be valid for recent degrees but not for advanced degrees from all time. I believe from what he has said, Timmers is no spring chicken, so I would like all of us to at least admit that he may know a few things that we don't. Does he know everything? who does? But I have the same educational background as Ansel Adams and although I dont entirely care for his work, I would never put myself on the same level. But I must say that my educational background gave me a leg up.

I have found that those who denigrate advanced degrees have never tried.

Reply
Dec 13, 2019 15:18:22   #
Hamltnblue Loc: Springfield PA
 
joncogar wrote:
One expensive drawback to mirrorless
cameras the sensor is exposed during lens changes. Dirt on the sensor is a bad thing

https://www.jmpeltier.com/disadvantages-of-mirrorless-cameras/


It's no more a problem on mirrorless if you change the lens right away.
If dirt gets on the mirror, it winds up on the sensor eventually when the mirror cycles.

Reply
 
 
Dec 13, 2019 15:23:24   #
dasgeiss
 
Retina wrote:
You are totally correct given the context. These are heavy cameras. Mirror vibration is heavily damped by the mass of the camera attached to fast, long, heavy lenses. Even though some pros select from hundreds of frames before submitting to their editors, I would expect none are ever rejected due to mirror shake.

My car was totaled last year by a large buck sprinting, I presume, from a wildlife photographer he mistook for a hunter with a cannon. Had it run into a freight train I doubt the engineer would have felt a thing. Recall that acceleration=Force/mass.

Attached to pro sports lenses, mirrors are tiny and nearly weightless, so shutter blur is practically non-existent. Stabilization on these systems is probably more important for nature work at dusk and dawn, for investigators, and photojournalists where the lighting can be a challenge and every bit helps. Even then, it is more likely needed for human movement when hand held with long exposures more than for the mirror mechanism.
You are totally correct given the context. These a... (show quote)


Totally Agree!!

Reply
Dec 13, 2019 15:33:35   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
When I was just a little boy, my parents used to take me to the camera store. I wanted to see the cameras. Such amazing designs, such amazing lenses, such amazing prices. My father would buy a new camera every few years even though his pictures where never really very good. He was always reading the DXO sharpness charts and discussing the micron size of the pixels. His images were hardly ever in focus. After he passed I was going through his things. I fear he read on UHH that equipment is what matters most and as he grew older, he never could free himself from this thought.

Reply
Dec 13, 2019 15:51:34   #
Beenthere
 
[quote=Badgertale]Interested in opinions concerning the functionality between DSLR's and Mirror-less cameras. I would like to purchase a mirror-less camera but I am not sold on why. Many blogs tout the future of photography but I have not seen any compelling reasons as to why I would be better off with the future as apposed to what I have at the moment (D700x2 and D500).

I've been shooting since the 60s, slightly more recently with an earlier digital cam. A long interval was next where I didn't do much photography at all. Once my interest had been rekindled I had to make a decision similar to yours. Since I had been an old "film" shooter The DSLR seemed the most familiar. Boy was I wrong, and have things ever changed. I decided that rather than back-stepping, I'd jump into the future. An old friend of mine recommended that I look into the Olympus products (I previously owned an old Pen F 1/2 frame film cam). Olympus seemed to be forging ahead on many fronts, including mirror-less technology, and a more compact design. The deep menus in modern cams can be daunting, but if you learn one, the others will come more easily. This may not answer your question but may provide food for thought. Bottom line: If you like the camera you have and have invested in lenses, you might want to stay there and just upgrade.

Reply
Dec 13, 2019 16:29:29   #
BebuLamar
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
When I was just a little boy, my parents used to take me to the camera store. I wanted to see the cameras. Such amazing designs, such amazing lenses, such amazing prices. My father would buy a new camera every few years even though his pictures where never really very good. He was always reading the DXO sharpness charts and discussing the micron size of the pixels. His images were hardly ever in focus. After he passed I was going through his things. I fear he read on UHH that equipment is what matters most and as he grew older, he never could free himself from this thought.
When I was just a little boy, my parents used to t... (show quote)


I don't mean to insult but are you telling the truth? DXO and you as a little boy don't seem to go together.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 10 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.