Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
More fascist progressive, brown-shirting violence......
Oct 12, 2019 15:03:41 #
thom w wrote:
If you are talking about paying for the damage they caused, I agree, though that may be difficult to do. I’m talking about security costs that would be incurred whether there were protesters or not.
The security costs are incurred because of the protester's deportment, a peaceful protest does not need $350,000 of security. The group you identify with is using violence to promote riots.
Oct 12, 2019 15:43:52 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
letmedance wrote:
The security costs are incurred because of the protester's deportment, a peaceful protest does not need $350,000 of security. The group you identify with is using violence to promote riots.
I am unable to gather facts and links to dispute that at this time.
Oct 12, 2019 16:32:29 #
Elaine2025 wrote:
Gosh, you mean the democrats are not the party of sweetness and unity? They say they are.
Evil leftie Dems have never changed. Since the civil war.
They just change costumes.
Just wait. The evil leftie violence will increase for 2020.
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Oct 12, 2019 17:31:23 #
thom w wrote:
If Trump were there as president he wouldn’t either. Campaigns are always charged. This was a political rally. The only part of this that has anything to do with trump is trump doesn’t pay his bills. Republican or Democrat, campaigns are responsible for the costs of political rallies.
You are indeed a hateful little man, I'll give you that
Oct 12, 2019 17:47:17 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
phcaan wrote:
You are indeed a hateful little man, I'll give you that
Kindly point out the hateful part of my post.
I don’t even hate you. Damned if I know why though.
Oct 12, 2019 18:00:09 #
thom w wrote:
Kindly point out the hateful part of my post.
I don’t even hate you. Damned if I know why though.
I don’t even hate you. Damned if I know why though.
Well I don't hate you either but my reason is that actually hating someone releases a ton of negative energy that will cause the hater more harm in the end than the hated.
Oct 13, 2019 07:32:36 #
thom w wrote:
I am unaware of the incident, and unlike yourself ... (show quote)
So you are saying it is ok to have violence because the Mayor told the cops not to respond. You say it is ok to not protect the public because the bill wasn't paid. Shows you how Democrats think. It is police brutality on the part of the Mayor to make the cops stand there while getting urine thrown at them and being unable to respond. Just shows how classless the Mayor is and how restrained the police are and how stupid you are as well. Maybe you and the Mayor should have piss thrown at both of you and see the response.
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Oct 13, 2019 09:40:01 #
The OP is a piece from an alt-right propaganda site. It may contain a lot of bias and some exaggerations of the actual events. The local press did not describe the situation and violence as nearly so extreme.
https://www.twincities.com/2019/10/10/trump-fans-protesters-in-minneapolis-ahead-of-target-center-rally/
http://www.startribune.com/protesters-start-arriving-leading-up-to-trump-rally-in-minneapolis/562749432/
https://www.twincities.com/2019/10/10/trump-fans-protesters-in-minneapolis-ahead-of-target-center-rally/
http://www.startribune.com/protesters-start-arriving-leading-up-to-trump-rally-in-minneapolis/562749432/
Oct 13, 2019 10:12:21 #
dennis2146 wrote:
You are entirely correct. I have mentioned many t... (show quote)
THAT’S why they are fascist progressives.
Oct 13, 2019 10:13:45 #
thom w wrote:
I am unaware of the incident, and unlike yourself ... (show quote)
B.S. and you k ow it.....they charged Obama $20k for the exact same “security” they were charging Trump $500k for.......THAT is suppression and THAT is fascist.
Oct 13, 2019 10:15:18 #
thom w wrote:
I haven’t seen any liberals marching with torches and chanting “Jews will not replace us”.
Actually you don’t see anything through your red tinted, fascist progressive glasses!
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Oct 13, 2019 10:16:20 #
thom w wrote:
If Trump were there as president he wouldn’t either. Campaigns are always charged. This was a political rally. The only part of this that has anything to do with trump is trump doesn’t pay his bills. Republican or Democrat, campaigns are responsible for the costs of political rallies.
Again, charging 26 times as much for a GOP candidate as they did for a Dem candidate is suppression and is a fascist tactic.
Oct 13, 2019 10:17:41 #
thom w wrote:
Kindly point out the hateful part of my post.
I don’t even hate you. Damned if I know why though.
I don’t even hate you. Damned if I know why though.
Seriously....give us a break!
Your subtle, soft bias, racism, hate, etc is as opaque as a screen door.
Oct 13, 2019 10:18:46 #
mwalsh wrote:
The OP is a piece from an alt-right propaganda site. It may contain a lot of bias and some exaggerations of the actual events. The local press did not describe the situation and violence as nearly so extreme.
https://www.twincities.com/2019/10/10/trump-fans-protesters-in-minneapolis-ahead-of-target-center-rally/
http://www.startribune.com/protesters-start-arriving-leading-up-to-trump-rally-in-minneapolis/562749432/
https://www.twincities.com/2019/10/10/trump-fans-protesters-in-minneapolis-ahead-of-target-center-rally/
http://www.startribune.com/protesters-start-arriving-leading-up-to-trump-rally-in-minneapolis/562749432/
There were SOTs of it on the news if that helps. The article pretty well described the events outside of the stadium.
Oct 13, 2019 11:00:08 #
thom w wrote:
Why should the trump campaign be allowed to cause municipalities financial hardship by refusing to pay their bills?
thom as usual you are missing the point of common sense in order to stick with the Liberal agenda. Now listen closely to two points that I thought I had made clear.
1. The Mayor of the city tried to not allow Trump to speak at all because he said it was Hate Speech. Now seriously when does the Democratic Mayor of a city get to tell the President of the United States he can't speak because he doesn't like what the President is going to say? Has that ever happened before in history? What about the Conservatives who live in that city? Don't you think THEY have a right to hear the President speak to them? Should we all just bow to the Liberal viewpoints you and other Snowflakes continue to push?
2. When past Democratic Presidents spoke at that very same city the charges imposed on President Trump were not imposed on those Democratic Presidents. Doesn't that sound a bit unequal to even you. Just think about it: Democratic Presidents get to speak and pay no fees while a Conservative President speaks and pays out the ass for exorbitant fees arbitrarily demanded by the Democratic Mayor. Now does that seem right you? It has nothing to do with Trump paying or not paying but the Mayor leveling excessive charges just because Trump is a Conservative.
Pay attention next time to what the hell is actually being done,
Dennis
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.