Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
New Construction Blasting that went bad!
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Sep 28, 2019 11:53:55   #
jpgto Loc: North East Tennessee
 
Yesterday the blasting crew set out to complete some demolition work on a
property next door. Spoke with the 'Master Blaster' about what was going to take place
and concern over the 'ooops factor'! I was assured that only small charges would be used
and they were well within the ranges for a closely populated neighborhood.
First detonation went off with a slight bump felt in the house. The seismic
monitor registered the blast around a 1.03 in my front yard. Later, the second bump
was much stronger, felt like the house jumped about 4 inches and resettled!
Whoa!
Seconds later, on the scanner, the local fire department, police, ambo and Fire Marshal
were being dispatched to our location for a 'blasting accident'! On their arrival they
found the mess you see in the pictures. They immediately called for the local building
official, State Fire Marshall and the State PD bob squad!!!!
I wandered outside to see what was going on. On the way past the seisomometer I
peeked at the reading....hmmmmm, 1.44! Mind you the blast was moved about 20 furtherer
away from this location. In my mind which should have been similar to the initial blast
reading.
As I went to the property line this is what I found! Before the responders arrived!
Guess the 'minimal charges' went out the window. This blast moved not only the debris you
see for a couple of hundred feet, it lifted 6 5,000 # blasting mats (30,000#) into the street and
down hill adjoining properties. So.....I guess this was not a 'minimal charge' set off on this blast!
If interested more can be found with a video of the blast at nbcct,com our CT NBC Channel
4 TV station. There was several news reports....Blasting Accident in Naugatuck.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 11:58:11   #
StanMac Loc: Tennessee
 
I hope the demolition company’s liability policies were paid up to date! Who would approve using blasting for demolition in a residential neighborhood anyway!?

Stan

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 12:01:02   #
RichardSM Loc: Back in Texas
 
Is the gray house yours and driveway too? Looks like a lawsuit is on its way!

Reply
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Sep 28, 2019 12:02:11   #
angler Loc: StHelens England
 
Wow it's lucky that someone did'nt get hurt and i agree with Stan why where they using explosives in a residential neighbourhood.

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 12:03:43   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Maybe it was the same size charge, but there was trapped gas underground that also exploded? or some other explosive materials? or some maybe some buried war memorabilia?

I say war memorabilia because I know a guy that passed away and when they went to his home to get it ready for an estate sale, they found some live hand grenades. The bomb squad was notified and came to recover them. You never know what might be buried near a home.

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 12:49:36   #
Curmudgeon Loc: SE Arizona
 
First question to me is what were they 'removing' certainly not a wood frame house, followed closely by what idiot issued the permit.

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 14:41:45   #
Cmbtvet Loc: Elmira, NY
 
As a combat engineer we have an old say for calculating demo charges P=plenty

Reply
 
 
Sep 28, 2019 15:28:30   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
Blasting charges are just like megapixels and AF points... MORE IS BETTER! (Unless you're right next door!)

P.S. You have a seismic monitor in your front yard? Heck, I live in California and I don't have one of those. (Actually, I'd rather not know!)

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 17:21:17   #
Bob Mevis Loc: Plymouth, Indiana
 
Oops indeed. Way too much bang was used.

Reply
Sep 29, 2019 07:01:18   #
foathog Loc: Greensboro, NC
 
Osama bin Laden. LOL



StanMac wrote:
I hope the demolition company’s liability policies were paid up to date! Who would approve using blasting for demolition in a residential neighborhood anyway!?

Stan

Reply
Sep 29, 2019 07:35:05   #
Manglesphoto Loc: 70 miles south of St.Louis
 
jpgto wrote:
Yesterday the blasting crew set out to complete some demolition work on a
property next door. Spoke with the 'Master Blaster' about what was going to take place
and concern over the 'ooops factor'! I was assured that only small charges would be used
and they were well within the ranges for a closely populated neighborhood.
First detonation went off with a slight bump felt in the house. The seismic
monitor registered the blast around a 1.03 in my front yard. Later, the second bump
was much stronger, felt like the house jumped about 4 inches and resettled!
Whoa!
Seconds later, on the scanner, the local fire department, police, ambo and Fire Marshal
were being dispatched to our location for a 'blasting accident'! On their arrival they
found the mess you see in the pictures. They immediately called for the local building
official, State Fire Marshall and the State PD bob squad!!!!
I wandered outside to see what was going on. On the way past the seisomometer I
peeked at the reading....hmmmmm, 1.44! Mind you the blast was moved about 20 furtherer
away from this location. In my mind which should have been similar to the initial blast
reading.
As I went to the property line this is what I found! Before the responders arrived!
Guess the 'minimal charges' went out the window. This blast moved not only the debris you
see for a couple of hundred feet, it lifted 6 5,000 # blasting mats (30,000#) into the street and
down hill adjoining properties. So.....I guess this was not a 'minimal charge' set off on this blast!
If interested more can be found with a video of the blast at nbcct,com our CT NBC Channel
4 TV station. There was several news reports....Blasting Accident in Naugatuck.
Yesterday the blasting crew set out to complete so... (show quote)


Glad your okay
Thats way too close for comfort. Why were the blasting?
I'M betting their Insurance just took a big jump.

Reply
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Sep 29, 2019 08:41:14   #
rustfarmer
 
The good news (for neighbors anyway) is the law provides "strict liability" for blasting activities.

Reply
Sep 29, 2019 08:46:31   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
foathog wrote:
Osama bin Laden. LOL


LOL?

Reply
Sep 29, 2019 09:26:20   #
Sylvias Loc: North Yorkshire England
 
Wow Jeff, pleased you and yours are ok.

Reply
Sep 29, 2019 10:39:55   #
Oldnintheway
 
I would have my house/foundation inspected by a professional for damage.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.