I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.
ronschulze wrote:
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.
Welcome aboard. Nikon guy here. I use a Nikon 200-500 for birds.
ronschulze wrote:
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.
What body are you using?
I use the Canon 100-400L mk2 (with and without the 1.4x III) and the Tamron 150-600 G2 with my 5DIV, 7DII and 80D.
If I had the money I would probably be using one of the big, fast primes but they are beyond my budget, unless I give up my other hobbies.
Go up to "search" and look up UHH user 'Regis' and look at his work. Both sitting and flying eagles and osprey. He uses the fast primes with extenders on a 5Dsr.
If you find a prime too limiting, go with the 100-400L II
ronschulze wrote:
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.
I really enjoy the 400/5.6 for this, it has no weight at all, so one can shoot it hand held all day long and don't even know its there (since that seems so important to many folks)!
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
100-400 II is really sharp. You can crop it pretty far and still get a usable image.
ronschulze wrote:
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.
You really have to give us a budget, you can spend over 12 grand on a lens which I would think you are not considering, but the point is that Canon and third party manufacturers offer lenses from the hundreds into the several thousands. Personally I love the Canon 100-400 II, I think it a better option than the Sigma 150-600 sport which would be my second choice, but both of those lenses cost over $1500 and I don't know if that is in your budget.
SX2002
Loc: Adelaide, South Australia
Sigma 150-600mm C, a brilliant, sharp lens, the extra reach over my old 150-500mm or a 400mm is well worth it.
A recent shot taken with it from about 30-40 meters. Just been selected as a finalsit in a natonal photography comp. "Wildlife" category...
Bought it new for AUD$1189...
As for BIF photography, the second series was 5 shots in one second taken in low speed rapid fire mode with my D500 and the Sigma 150-600mm.
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
ronschulze wrote:
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.
Look no further than the Canon 100-400 II lens.
Nalu
Loc: Southern Arizona
I used a 400mm DOII for quite some time and had some good results. However, specifically for BIF, I am getting much better results with my Sony a9 and native Sony glass.
Nalu wrote:
I used a 400mm DOII for quite some time and had some good results. However, specifically for BIF, I am getting much better results with my Sony a9 and native Sony glass.
You are looking at a $5000 investment, not sure that he OP wants to go there, he has yet to mention a budget.
ronschulze wrote:
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.
If you are new to BIF, stick with a zoom for now. While a long prime lens might be where you ultimately go, when starting you need practice keeping the target in frame. A zoom will allow you the flexibility to develop that skill.
Without knowing more about your situation is hard to give a solid recommendation.
What body are you using?
What lenses do you have now?
Are you looking at hawks in flight, shore birds, etc...
I only occasionally do BIF now and use my 70-200 2.8 with a 2x extender.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.