Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Photographing Birds
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Jul 24, 2019 10:36:52   #
ronschulze
 
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.

Reply
Jul 24, 2019 11:31:21   #
PixelStan77 Loc: Vermont/Chicago
 
ronschulze wrote:
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.


Welcome aboard. Nikon guy here. I use a Nikon 200-500 for birds.

Reply
Jul 24, 2019 12:05:10   #
ronschulze
 
thanks

Reply
 
 
Jul 24, 2019 12:14:09   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
ronschulze wrote:
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.


What body are you using?

I use the Canon 100-400L mk2 (with and without the 1.4x III) and the Tamron 150-600 G2 with my 5DIV, 7DII and 80D.

If I had the money I would probably be using one of the big, fast primes but they are beyond my budget, unless I give up my other hobbies.

Go up to "search" and look up UHH user 'Regis' and look at his work. Both sitting and flying eagles and osprey. He uses the fast primes with extenders on a 5Dsr.

Reply
Jul 24, 2019 12:23:35   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
If you find a prime too limiting, go with the 100-400L II

Reply
Jul 24, 2019 13:06:47   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
ronschulze wrote:
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.


I really enjoy the 400/5.6 for this, it has no weight at all, so one can shoot it hand held all day long and don't even know its there (since that seems so important to many folks)!

Reply
Jul 24, 2019 15:57:06   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
ronschulze wrote:
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.


My two favorite bird photographers use Canon gear.

Sharron Crocker uses a 5DMkIII and either a 400mmF5.6 or a 100-400 II occasionally with a 1.4X TC

https://untamednewyork.smugmug.com/Birds

And Laura Meyers uses a 5DMkIV and a 100-400 II also with a 1.4X TC

https://www.flickr.com/photos/laurameyers/with/48080807446/

Reply
 
 
Jul 24, 2019 21:36:09   #
ronschulze
 
Thanks all!

Reply
Jul 24, 2019 21:41:57   #
rick_n_wv Loc: Charleston WV
 
100-400 II is really sharp. You can crop it pretty far and still get a usable image.

Reply
Jul 24, 2019 21:48:02   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
ronschulze wrote:
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.


You really have to give us a budget, you can spend over 12 grand on a lens which I would think you are not considering, but the point is that Canon and third party manufacturers offer lenses from the hundreds into the several thousands. Personally I love the Canon 100-400 II, I think it a better option than the Sigma 150-600 sport which would be my second choice, but both of those lenses cost over $1500 and I don't know if that is in your budget.

Reply
Jul 25, 2019 02:47:50   #
SX2002 Loc: Adelaide, South Australia
 
Sigma 150-600mm C, a brilliant, sharp lens, the extra reach over my old 150-500mm or a 400mm is well worth it.
A recent shot taken with it from about 30-40 meters. Just been selected as a finalsit in a natonal photography comp. "Wildlife" category...
Bought it new for AUD$1189...
As for BIF photography, the second series was 5 shots in one second taken in low speed rapid fire mode with my D500 and the Sigma 150-600mm.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Jul 25, 2019 07:33:29   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
ronschulze wrote:
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.


Look no further than the Canon 100-400 II lens.

Reply
Jul 25, 2019 09:06:04   #
Nalu Loc: Southern Arizona
 
I used a 400mm DOII for quite some time and had some good results. However, specifically for BIF, I am getting much better results with my Sony a9 and native Sony glass.

Reply
Jul 25, 2019 09:17:55   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
Nalu wrote:
I used a 400mm DOII for quite some time and had some good results. However, specifically for BIF, I am getting much better results with my Sony a9 and native Sony glass.


You are looking at a $5000 investment, not sure that he OP wants to go there, he has yet to mention a budget.

Reply
Jul 25, 2019 09:26:44   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
ronschulze wrote:
I would like input on good lens for a Canon for capturing flying birds.


If you are new to BIF, stick with a zoom for now. While a long prime lens might be where you ultimately go, when starting you need practice keeping the target in frame. A zoom will allow you the flexibility to develop that skill.

Without knowing more about your situation is hard to give a solid recommendation.

What body are you using?
What lenses do you have now?
Are you looking at hawks in flight, shore birds, etc...

I only occasionally do BIF now and use my 70-200 2.8 with a 2x extender.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.