Would appreciate a rec for a tipod with ball head, Al or carbon that hold between 19-25 lbs. Thanks.
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
Camera? Lens(es)? Subject material? - this is what will determine what you end up buying - load capacity has nothing to do with your decision. A tripod selected based on torsional rigidity for your application - wide angle and normal lenses requiring less rigidity than macro, closeup and long lens use - will ALWAYS have at least double to triple the load capacity you are looking for. A tripod with only a 19 lb load capacity, especially if it is aluminum, will likely not be very rigid.
Load Capacity: 39.7 lb should handle any lens you might have and what you want to photograph.
Nest NT-6324CT CF Tripod
$299.00
Nest NT-6324CTM Carbon Fiber tripod . Lightweight, compact carbon fiber tripod for travel or backpacking. This 44# load rated tripod folds to only 19" long and weighs only 4 1/4 pounds.
It adds a removable leg section which, when coupled with the center column, makes for a very nice monopod, very quickly.
Retractable spiked feet assure a stable platform for your camera gear. This tripod is quite compatible with any head from a simple ball head all the way up to a Gimbal head for that long wildlife lens.
Nest NT-648H Ball Head
$129.95
An oil-less ball head with 44# capacity featuring an ARCA "slide-in", high security type Quick Release system that is now fully Arca-Swiss compatible. (The adjustable jaw opens wide enough for ARCA plate "drop-in" installation as well as the Nest "slide-in" plates.) Full ball release with one lever featuring front and back grooving for 180 degree articulation, as well as adjustable friction control. This head also offers separate base panning control so you are able to pan the head without releasing the ball. An amazing price for a ball head of this capacity and value!
FREE SHIPPING IF PURCHASED WITH A TRIPOD!
This is Carter's store, MT Shooter on our board.
I'm 6'2" and I don't have to bend over to take a shot.
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
rcfees wrote:
Would appreciate a rec for a tipod with ball head, Al or carbon that hold between 19-25 lbs. Thanks.
Tripod, Benro, head , Manfrotto ball head.
Since you didn't mention money ... you should at least look at the RRS offerings. Yes they are expensive but I'll bet there isn't a Hogg out there who bought from them and then regretted it. You buy the tripod from RRS and you won't ever need another. Yes, I own a RRS tripod.
Howard5252 wrote:
Since you didn't mention money ... you should at least look at the RRS offerings. Yes they are expensive but I'll bet there isn't a Hogg out there who bought from them and then regretted it. You buy the tripod from RRS and you won't ever need another. Yes, I own a RRS tripod.
Well I bought a tripod from RRS and I'm ready to buy another but with larger diameter legs. I have the TVC-33 and it works very well with my 300mm f/2.8 even with a 2X and pro body. Solid as a rock even in strong winds. Gene 51 always said that you'd need a tripod with more rigidity with a 600mm f/4.0 and I questioned that but experience in the field has once again proven Gene right. I am buying the RRS TVC-43 and my wife is happy about all of this as she will now be using the 33 all the time, she is an avid photographer too. Hard to beat anything from RRS and no I don't own the company or work for them either.
RRS
Peak Design will be shipping their travel tripod in Dec. I have one on order. check it out.
I still use a 35 year old Leitz Tilt-all that seems to have met all my requirements over that period.
dick ranez wrote:
I still use a 35 year old Leitz Tilt-all that seems to have met all my requirements over that period.
I have one as well, and it is a great tripod. however it never leaves home. it is a moose.
cjc2
Loc: Hellertown PA
Please go to the RRS (Really Right Stuff) site and read the information there about tripods, whether you buy one from them or not. I own a Carbon Fiber Gitzo, which I bought before RRS made tripods. Very expensive and also very good. Best of luck.
Gene51 wrote:
Camera? Lens(es)? Subject material? - this is what will determine what you end up buying - load capacity has nothing to do with your decision. A tripod selected based on torsional rigidity for your application - wide angle and normal lenses requiring less rigidity than macro, closeup and long lens use - will ALWAYS have at least double to triple the load capacity you are looking for. A tripod with only a 19 lb load capacity, especially if it is aluminum, will likely not be very rigid.
Gene I am not disagreeing with you but why mention subject material? Whatever is shot on a tripod, isn't the main requirement steadiness no matter if the subject is a tiny spider or a landscape shot or maybe the moon?
Dennis
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.