BuckeyeBilly wrote:
It seems like not a day goes by that someone here on UHH brings up the category of bridge cameras or superzooms...and the overwhelming majority of the cameras mentioned are either the Nikon P510 or Canon SX40 or Panasonic FZ150. These are all very good cameras in their own right.....but I'm trying to figure out why hardly ANYONE ever mentions the Fujifilm superzooms as ones to also consider? So....I'm going to give a link to someone who uses them AT HIS JOB (you know, real world practical experience!), which should remind us that there's more to life than just Nikon or Canon or Panasonic or even Sony.
The main article is about the Fuji HS30EXR but you'll also find a link to the Fuji X-S1. Both of these cameras, according to the author, are dubbed as the only real, true bridge cameras made right now....and he gives a pretty good argument as to why he says so.
http://www.safari-guide.co.uk/fujifilm-finepix-hs30exr-digital-camera-review.phpHere is info on both of these cameras:
http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/s/finepix_hs30exr/http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/x/fujifilm_x_s1/It seems like not a day goes by that someone here ... (
show quote)
I've considered Fuji cameras several times in the past but when doing side by side comparisons, Fuji will typically be weak in one thing that another brand isn't - such as low light performance, or highest usable ISO, or maximum f/number, or non-articulated LCD screen, etc. Fuji goes the extra mile or even two miles on many features then falls on their corporate face on one negative.
As the article author said, this HS30EXR looks to be the ultimate bridge camera except for bulk that some people wouldn't like but I DO (so some buyers will be shoved away by that) and manual zoom that some people wouldn't like but I DO (other buyers will be shoved away by that) - then they cheap out at the last minute and don't have an articulated screen which harms the total satisfaction score of the otherwise excellent unit (which shoves way even more buyers). Why would they do this with the LCD screen and blow a perfect camera package? You can see why Fuji is many times shunned by buyers.
I also think that they have a stigma on them that they were and are a film company, like Kodak was, and digital cameras by film companies aren't taken seriously like cameras by companies that don't make film. Canon makes copiers and fax machines so they should have a stigma attached to them too but it doesn't stick because there are optics involved. And Canon MAKES their own cameras. Sony makes TVs, video cameras, Blu-Ray players, and home theater systems but that actually enhances Sony's reputation in the electronics world and Sony also MAKES their cameras. Panasonic makes battery powered nose hair cutters and microwave ovens but nobody seems to care and they MAKE their cameras. It's just that a film company trying to be in digital photography by having someone else make cameras and slap their name on them is a stigma that harms their market share pretty badly.
Another problem is that Fuji cameras don't hold to their retail pricing very well. The article says street price is $499 but the Amazon ad at the bottom of the same page sells it for $331. Cheap price should draw buyers but it scares others that think something must not be right when the price is so low but the features are so plentiful. The inquiring mind wonders why but can't find an answer and eliminates Fuji as a potential purchase. Meanwhile Canon, Nikon, and Sony are up at $400+ for similar models and they get it.
Another problem is that I don't see any Fuji brick and mortar dealers so I can handle one and play around. I can always find Canon, Nikon, or Sony in Best Buy or even Target, if not a real camera store, to handle and try out.
I'm aware that some Fuji cameras are made by Pentax and that's an excellent reference point for me because Pentax makes excellent stuff and always has. That's likely why the super zoom lens on this Fuji is excellent at both ends of the spectrum. This model may be a Pentax, partially made by Pentax, or use a Pentax lens but that's all good in any case.
I agree, this is an excellent item, the sensor seems to be awesome, and I wouldn't be afraid of it at all - but now Panasonic is coming out with the FZ200 with f/2.8 throughout the zoom range and it's going to dominate the market until Canon and Nikon have that feature too. Will Fuji follow suit?