Is the focus on target ?
Aug 21, 2012 18:18:16 #
Please tell me if I have the focus right on this one ,Seems when I blow up the pic on the pc is getting worse .
Thank you
Thank you
Aug 21, 2012 19:22:46 #
From the pixel size of this version of the picture it looks to me like it is not what was originally shot, but was compressed into a relatively small format of 640 pixels wide etc. For what it is here I think it is about as good as can be expected, and explains why enlargement is so unsatisfactory. It is already at the maximum resolution for the format size.
Aug 21, 2012 19:31:17 #
Thank you Bobber I should have keep the original who was 3487 pixels and posted like that ?
Aug 21, 2012 19:35:56 #
Aug 21, 2012 19:47:55 #
For a D7000, this is quite a small JPG. Is your camera set to JPG fine, for maximum resolution? This size image does not tolerate much enlargement.
Also, 300-mm, max tele-photo of your zoom, is not the best focal length to evaluate your camera.
The problem is not the focus of your camera.
Also, 300-mm, max tele-photo of your zoom, is not the best focal length to evaluate your camera.
The problem is not the focus of your camera.
Aug 21, 2012 20:38:53 #
Thank you Nikonian
yes the camera is set on "Jpeg Fine " what is the best set up for this ? and what is the best focal lenght to evaluate the camera ?
Again thank's for your time and in insights
yes the camera is set on "Jpeg Fine " what is the best set up for this ? and what is the best focal lenght to evaluate the camera ?
Again thank's for your time and in insights
Aug 22, 2012 00:22:29 #
Sorry to say, your lens does not have a good reputation. Read more here:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/70300g.htm 2/3 down article, read about resolution at various focal lengths.
You have not yet posted a "straight from camera" JPG, which would be most helpful, especially if captured with a standard lens.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/70300g.htm 2/3 down article, read about resolution at various focal lengths.
You have not yet posted a "straight from camera" JPG, which would be most helpful, especially if captured with a standard lens.
Aug 22, 2012 08:42:14 #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Sorry to say, your lens does not have a good reputation. Read more here:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/70300g.htm 2/3 down article, read about resolution at various focal lengths.
You have not yet posted a "straight from camera" JPG, which would be most helpful, especially if captured with a standard lens.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/70300g.htm 2/3 down article, read about resolution at various focal lengths.
You have not yet posted a "straight from camera" JPG, which would be most helpful, especially if captured with a standard lens.
Again thank you here is another one "unretouched "
Aug 22, 2012 09:24:24 #
Hi Nikonian , the lens that Mr Kentrockwell is discussing is not the same as the one i own , is there a difference between the two ? mine is a VR ,offer with the camera as a gift
I know for a fact that the problem reside behind the camera !!! :oops:
I know for a fact that the problem reside behind the camera !!! :oops:
Aug 22, 2012 10:59:46 #
FRENCHY wrote:
Again thank you here is another one "unretouched "
Nikonian72 wrote:
Sorry to say, your lens does not have a good reputation. Read more here:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/70300g.htm 2/3 down article, read about resolution at various focal lengths.
You have not yet posted a "straight from camera" JPG, which would be most helpful, especially if captured with a standard lens.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/70300g.htm 2/3 down article, read about resolution at various focal lengths.
You have not yet posted a "straight from camera" JPG, which would be most helpful, especially if captured with a standard lens.
Again thank you here is another one "unretouched "
Can you post this again but click "save original" box? I would like to try something.
Jim D
Aug 22, 2012 11:10:25 #
FRENCHY wrote:
What about this one
I reduced the noise and sharpened this photo a little. The DOF seems to be a little shallow meaning the aperture needs to be increased to possibly f13 or so.
Nice shot of avery pretty butterfly.
Jim D
Aug 22, 2012 17:48:19 #
oldtool2 wrote:
quote=FRENCHY quote=Nikonian72 Sorry to say, you... (show quote)
Thank you Jim here two of the same I think
Aug 23, 2012 03:22:09 #
FRENCHY wrote:
quote=oldtool2 quote=FRENCHY quote=Nikonian72 S... (show quote)
OK, I cropped, lightened it a bit and sharpene it a bit. For as close as this shot was taken the DOF is too shallow. I don't think the problem is with the focus.
Here is a web site for you to look at:
http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html
Jim D
Aug 23, 2012 10:19:56 #
oldtool2 wrote:
quote=FRENCHY quote=oldtool2 quote=FRENCHY quo... (show quote)
Jim thank you , I start to get the " picture " like I was saying the problem is on the back of the camera . I will try again
Aug 23, 2012 10:20:15 #
oldtool2 wrote:
quote=FRENCHY quote=oldtool2 quote=FRENCHY quo... (show quote)
Jim thank you , I start to get the " picture " like I was saying the problem is on the back of the camera . I will try again
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.