...not to go to the Needles District of Canyonlands National Park.
#1: Its 65 (or whatever) miles from Moab! That's an hour and a half --minimum-- hours of precious driving time, during which you have to go past the Cameo Cliffs and Muleshoe Canyon and a bunch of other essentially uninteresting areas while you could've gotten to Arches NP in a matter of minutes. Along with roughly 14,867 other people, all of whom are lined up at the TWO entrance booths Arches has to offer.
#2: After turning off the 'highway' (harrumph; all two lanes of it), you have to go past Marie's Place and through Photograph Gap under the disdainful eye of the Abajo Mountains (and, at dusk, herds of deer that number in the hundreds). Before long, you exit Hart's Draw and you drop into Indian Creek Canyon, a known yawner of a canyon with nothing whatsoever to see. Once it opens up, its all cow country, right up to the Park Boundary, and you know how dreadful that can be.
#3: The Needles is predominantly a backcountry place, and everybody knows: if its more than ten feet off the (paved) road, it isn't photogenic.
Attached are three images to illustrate ways I wasted a whole day. And didn't even go into the Park.
and if you go east toward the La Sal Mtns you can find dinosaur tracks.
LESTAHL wrote:
and if you go east toward the La Sal Mtns you can find dinosaur tracks.
Why go all that way? There's dino tracks a mile and a half from where I live.
Sylvias
Loc: North Yorkshire England
All three downloads and compositions are excellent Cany, love the clouds in #3.
I would hardly call the day wasted. Great photos.
Good set. I would like to visit there.
Cany143 wrote:
...not to go to the Needles District of Canyonlands National Park.
#1: Its 65 (or whatever) miles from Moab! That's an hour and a half --minimum-- hours of precious driving time, during which you have to go past the Cameo Cliffs and Muleshoe Canyon and a bunch of other essentially uninteresting areas while you could've gotten to Arches NP in a matter of minutes. Along with roughly 14,867 other people, all of whom are lined up at the TWO entrance booths Arches has to offer.
#2: After turning off the 'highway' (harrumph; all two lanes of it), you have to go past Marie's Place and through Photograph Gap under the disdainful eye of the Abajo Mountains (and, at dusk, herds of deer that number in the hundreds). Before long, you exit Hart's Draw and you drop into Indian Creek Canyon, a known yawner of a canyon with nothing whatsoever to see. Once it opens up, its all cow country, right up to the Park Boundary, and you know how dreadful that can be.
#3: The Needles is predominantly a backcountry place, and everybody knows: if its more than ten feet off the (paved) road, it isn't photogenic.
Attached are three images to illustrate ways I wasted a whole day. And didn't even go into the Park.
...not to go to the Needles District of Canyonland... (
show quote)
Typical Slacker behavior.
#1 is just beautiful.
Jeeze, Cany. When you waste your time and then post it, you are wasting ALL of our time. You've really disappointed this time. Looks like there is more rock art on the next panel over on that first photo. Anything good?
Retired CPO wrote:
Jeeze, Cany. When you waste your time and then post it, you are wasting ALL of our time. You've really disappointed this time. Looks like there is more rock art on the next panel over on that first photo. Anything good?
As rg all-too-accurately (above) pointed out, yeah, slacker-ness & generally wasting my --and anybody else's-- time, with irrelevancies & pointlessnesses & such has sort of become my goal in life. As regards the adjacent panel, no, there's nothing really special. (The special stuff --fifty or eighty panels, however many there might be-- are all on the other side of the canyon (assuming you're not including the 'Fighting Man' panel or a few dozen others on the same side as the panel I included) and jeez!, ya gotta walk as much as a hunnert yards or whatever to see the good stuff, and there's no way I'd suggest anybody doing something as goofy as that.)
I'd be lying if I said, 'sorry to waste your time.' But only because lying, like coming up with snark, takes work, and we slackers
do not work at anything except not working.
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
Typical Slacker behavior.
#1 is just beautiful.
I am deeply insulted, rg. However accurate your description might be.
But I'm pleased you liked #1, so I suppose its a wash.
NMGal wrote:
I would hardly call the day wasted. Great photos.
Snark-o-meter not operating today?
But thanks.....
B-b-but, its all
negative advertising, Jim! (Best way to keep secrets is to shout 'em from the rooftops!)
Sylvias wrote:
All three downloads and compositions are excellent Cany, love the clouds in #3.
Thanks, Syl. Still, there's nowhere to get a
proper English tea, with maybe a scone or two, anywhere around here, though, so we gotta settle for compositions and clouds and stuff.
RichardTaylor wrote:
Good set. I would like to visit there.
I expect you'd like it quite a lot. To the point that there's places around here you'd think you're still home. (Ok, maybe not in Sydney, exactly, but very much so like in other parts of Oz-land.)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.