Joe Biden. Really?
Feb 22, 2019 20:05:08 #
Some facts avout Biden. His net worth is on the order of $ 950,000. Yearly income $280-300,000. He is one of the poorest lifelong politicians in the country. He obvoiusly did not handle his money so as to live a comfortable life style. For some reason he did not handle his high income very well. If this is true why should the people put him in chaqrge of the US multi trillion exonomy. Something to think about.
Feb 22, 2019 20:10:13 #
Feb 22, 2019 20:12:30 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
boberic wrote:
Some facts avout Biden. His net worth is on the order of $ 950,000. Yearly income $280-300,000. He is one of the poorest lifelong politicians in the country. He obvoiusly did not handle his money so as to live a comfortable life style. For some reason he did not handle his high income very well. If this is true why should the people put him in chaqrge of the US multi trillion exonomy. Something to think about.
He isn't a Republican so it could be that greed, personal wealth, excessive gain aren't things that drive him. I find that admirable. I'm tired of politicians who are just in it for personal gain. Why aren't you? To be able to shake hands with the president and be confident you will still have all your fingers seems like a good thing.
Feb 22, 2019 20:12:57 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
LWW wrote:
The amazing thing is he’s also a known deadbeat.
Care to document that?
Feb 22, 2019 20:13:04 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
thom w wrote:
He isn't a Republican so it could be that greed, personal wealth, excessive gain aren't things that drive him. I find that admirable. I'm tired of politicians who are just in it for personal gain. Why aren't you? To be able to shake hands with the president and be confident you will still have all your fingers seems like a good thing.
That was precious.
Feb 22, 2019 20:13:48 #
Feb 22, 2019 20:14:05 #
Feb 22, 2019 20:36:41 #
Feb 22, 2019 20:38:53 #
thom w wrote:
He isn't a Republican so it could be that greed, personal wealth, excessive gain aren't things that drive him. I find that admirable. I'm tired of politicians who are just in it for personal gain. Why aren't you? To be able to shake hands with the president and be confident you will still have all your fingers seems like a good thing.
President Obama's net worth in 2008 was estimated at $1.3 million and at the end of his 2 terms was between $12 million to $40 million according to Business Insider, others keep it at 12 million tops. Obama is a Democrat, is he also greedy?
The Obamas are worth 30 times more than when they entered the White House in 2008 — here's how they spend their millions
https://www.businessinsider.com/barack-obama-michelle-obama-net-worth-2018-7
Snopes.com rates it as undetermined.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/net-worth/
Feb 22, 2019 20:44:32 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
Kmgw9v wrote:
I wonder if Anita Hill would support him.
He did vote against Thomas and it was different times and he has said he wished he had handled it differently a thousand times. If she doesn't support him, I doubt that that is the reason, but I don't know.
Feb 22, 2019 20:47:01 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
EyeSawYou wrote:
President Obama's net worth in 2008 was estimated ... (show quote)
See you want it both ways. If he's been in office any length of time and he isn't wealthy he's a moron and you can't trust him. If he has grown wealthy while in office he's greedy and a crook. Neither has to be true.
Feb 22, 2019 20:49:21 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
I wonder if Anita Hill would support him.
6 Pieces Of Evidence Anita Hill Was Lying
https://www.dailywire.com/news/5185/6-pieces-evidence-anita-hill-was-lying-amanda-prestigiacomo
Feb 22, 2019 20:49:47 #
thom w wrote:
He did vote against Thomas and it was different times and he has said he wished he had handled it differently a thousand times. If she doesn't support him, I doubt that that is the reason, but I don't know.
I don't remember all of it; but didn't he refuse to permit corroborating testimony from other Clarance victims?
Feb 22, 2019 20:51:16 #
thom w wrote:
See you want it both ways. If he's been in office any length of time and he isn't wealthy he's a moron and you can't trust him. If he has grown wealthy while in office he's greedy and a crook. Neither has to be true.
Liar, it is YOU that wants it both ways, I could care less what any politicians net worth is before and after serving office. It was YOU that implied greed is ONLY comes from Republicans.
Feb 22, 2019 20:54:47 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
Kmgw9v wrote:
I don't remember all of it; but didn't he refuse to permit corroborating testimony from other Clarance victims?
I'm not sure of the details but Thomas saying "High tech lynching" obviously got to him, and I think you are right. He allowed her to testify, even though the Republicans didn't want her to, but he didn't allow any other witnesses. Thomas doesn't want other black people getting any advantages because they are black, but he'll take any advantage he can get.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.