NBC Criminal Smear of Brett Kavanaugh (Page 2): You need to read about this more before you look even MORE foolish. NBC aired the false story....not the TRUTH.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

JamesCurran wrote:

So, you are claiming the NBC "sat on" this information ---- BY AIRING IMMEDIATELY ON THEIR NETWORK!

Further, while this would discredit Swetnick's claims, it would have ZERO effect on FOrd charges against Kavanaugh.

You need to read about this more before you look even MORE foolish.

NBC aired the false story....not the TRUTH.

JamesCurran Loc: Trenton ,NJ

Elaine2025 wrote:

You need to read about this more before you look even MORE foolish.

NBC aired the false story....not the TRUTH.

No, they "aired on Oct. 1, Swetnick back-tracked on or contradicted parts of her sworn statement where she alleged she witnessed then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh". They aired her back-tracking on her accusation.

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

Long after the hearings, when NBC knew about this at the time of the hearings.......

JamesCurran wrote:

No, they "aired on Oct. 1, Swetnick back-tracked on or contradicted parts of her sworn statement where she alleged she witnessed then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh". They aired her back-tracking on her accusation.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

JamesCurran wrote:

No, they "aired on Oct. 1, Swetnick back-tracked on or contradicted parts of her sworn statement where she alleged she witnessed then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh". They aired her back-tracking on her accusation.

You are wrong and numerous news articles support that you are wrong. NBC even admitted it.

JamesCurran Loc: Trenton ,NJ

Screamin Scott wrote:

Long after the hearings, when NBC knew about this at the time of the hearings.......

Actually, it aired on Oct 1st. Kavanaugh's confirmation vote wasn't taken until Oct 5th. And how could NBC possibly know she would recant on-air in advance?

In fact, getting a person to recant on air requires the interviewer to actually ask hard hitting questions (unlike the fluff ball questions they ask on Fox)

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

JamesCurran wrote:

Actually, it aired on Oct 1st. Kavanaugh's confirmation vote wasn't taken until Oct 5th. And how could NBC possibly know she would recant on-air in advance?

In fact, getting a person to recant on air requires the interviewer to actually ask hard hitting questions (unlike the fluff ball questions they ask on Fox)

You are wrong. NBC knew ahead of time and sat on it. They admit it.

JamesCurran Loc: Trenton ,NJ

Elaine2025 wrote:

You are wrong. NBC knew ahead of time and sat on it. They admit it.

No they didn't. They did acknowledge that they could not independently verify the woman's claims --- BUT they clearly stated that at the time of the interview. They did not "sit" on anything.

This is just the right-wing media trying to create a scandal to distract from the credible charges against Kavanagh.

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

Then why is this being investigated by the Justice Department... Stop with the conspiracy theories. It makes you look stupid when there are articles out there showing this was happening...

JamesCurran wrote:

No they didn't. They did acknowledge that they could not independently verify the woman's claims --- BUT they clearly stated that at the time of the interview. They did not "sit" on anything.

This is just the right-wing media trying to create a scandal to distract from the credible charges against Kavanagh.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

JamesCurran wrote:

No they didn't. They did acknowledge that they could not independently verify the woman's claims --- BUT they clearly stated that at the time of the interview. They did not "sit" on anything.

This is just the right-wing media trying to create a scandal to distract from the credible charges against Kavanagh.

How much proof do you need??????

You just can't accept that you belong to a party of crooks. There are many articles about this and you deny the truth.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/nbc-reporter-tries-fails-to-explain-why-she-sat-on-exculpatory-kavanaugh-evidence

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/nbc-news-raises-eyebrows-by-sitting-on-info-that-contradicted-michael-avenatti-client

https://www.lifenews.com/2018/10/26/nbc-admits-it-hid-evidence-that-undermined-kavanaugh-accuser-julie-swetnicks-wild-claims/

https://freebeacon.com/blog/nbc-news-sit-evidence-discrediting-kavanaugh-accuser-weeks/

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2018/10/26/nolte-nbc-news-hid-info-wouldve-cleared-kavanaugh-avenatti-rape-allegations/

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

JamesCurran wrote:

So, you are claiming the NBC "sat on" this information ---- BY AIRING IMMEDIATELY ON THEIR NETWORK!

Further, while this would discredit Swetnick's claims, it would have ZERO effect on FOrd charges against Kavanaugh.

It is the rest of the information in the article that they sat on, sorry, your are willfully missing the misconduct of NBC. The woman who stated that she never thought that Kavanaugh did those things, the same woman that the Dirty Porn lawyer said would confirm the allegations.

richosob Loc: Lambertville, MI

Elaine2025 wrote:

If dems are in control anywhere the story will be buried so deep you couldn't blow it out of the hole with dynamite.

👍👍👍 Demonrats, the party of hate, violence and fake news.

Rich

richosob Loc: Lambertville, MI

Checkmate wrote:

Dumb one, it has a name at the end. Get your old fat ugly lady to read it for you.

Now that’s funny. LMAO

Rich

fantom Loc: Colorado

Elaine2025 wrote:

ARE YOU DELUSIONAL????? DEMOCRATS ARE THE ONES THAT TRIED TO DESTROY KAVANAUGH. NBC, DEMOCRAT OWNED AND MANAGED SAT ON THE INFORMATION THAT WOULD HAVE CLEARED KAVANAUGH. DEMOCRAT SENATORS DEMONIZED KAVANAUGH AND SCREAMED "WOMEN MUST BE BELIEVED" EVEN IF THEY ARE LIARS.

WHAT KIND OF DRUGS ARE YOU TAKING???