Supreme Court Rape.... Latest controversies about Bret involve possible charges of incapacitating women with drugs or alcohol, and subjecting them to “trains,” or multiple consecutive...

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

Latest controversies about Bret involve possible charges of incapacitating women with drugs or alcohol, and subjecting them to “trains,” or multiple consecutive rapes, a sort of Rape Party for the boys.

If true, Georgetown Prep seems a sort of Drugs, Beer, and Forced Sex Rape Manufactory, a sort of permissive scandal factory where teenaged males could be sheltered in their testerone fantasies victimizing females, then apparently move on to Republican Politics and even Republican Law School, finally to service in the Republlican Supreme Court cabal of anti-Abortion, Low Taxes and War.

What a perfect selection Trump made, even after Mitch discouraged this nominee.

Curtis_Lowe Loc: Georgia

Twardlow wrote:

Latest controversies about Bret involve possible c... (show quote)

It apparently does not take much to convince you of anything "if true" that is so cute. It allows you to go on and make the rest of your post. So much for due process, all I have heard so far of this claim is from the camera chasing Lawyer, that says he wants to run for president.

The second accusation comes from a women that says to her friends that she is not sure it was the Judge, as she had been playing a drinking game, and no one can even put the judge at the party.

The first accusation will have her say under oath in a day or too. Why not just wait to hear from her? Too much to ask I guess.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Curtis_Lowe wrote:

It apparently does not take much to convince you o... (show quote)

So Curtis, just for perspective. How many women that know you think you may have raped them? An estimate would be fine. We don't need exact numbers.

Curtis_Lowe Loc: Georgia

Frank T wrote:

So Curtis, just for perspective. How many women that know you think you may have raped them? An estimate would be fine. We don't need exact numbers.

Gee aren't you going to ask me when I stopped beating my wife?

Curtis_Lowe Loc: Georgia

Frank T wrote:

So Curtis, just for perspective. How many women that know you think you may have raped them? An estimate would be fine. We don't need exact numbers.

Oh and I really like the WE part nice touch.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Curtis_Lowe wrote:

Gee aren't you going to ask me when I stopped beating my wife?

No, but feel free to disclose if you wish. I would guess that you don't have any women who think you raped them. This is probably attributable to having not raped them.
Do you see where I'm going here?

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Frank T wrote:

No, but feel free to disclose if you wish. I would guess that you don't have any women who think you raped them. This is probably attributable to having not raped them.
Do you see where I'm going here?

Probably not. Love is blind for those infatuated with the "Grabber."

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

Curtis_Lowe wrote:

It apparently does not take much to convince you o... (show quote)

Well, as uninformed as your are, I had to post to give you time to catch up.

Michael has stood up so far, if you notice, and today and tomorrow will point one way or the other.

Soon “100 kegs” will pair up with “Soon Ten Thousand Lies,” and at least one Republican senator, Graham, is more concerned with protecting K’s lifestyle than living up to his oath to protect the nation from “enemies, foreign and domestic,” and if these two don’t qualify as domestic enemies, the team is meaningless.

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

I like the way you folks on the left convict someone because accusations have been made' Ever hear of a trial (of some kind)

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

boberic wrote:

I like the way you folks on the left convict someone because accusations have been made' Ever hear of a trial (of some kind)

That’s exactly what we want, but “Soon The Thousand Lies” won’t order one—not a trial as such, but a substantial effort to gain such truth as is responsible and possible.

And Senator Graham is more concerned with protecting K’s sex life and drinking that in his Senatorial Duties.

Curtis_Lowe Loc: Georgia

Frank T wrote:

No, but feel free to disclose if you wish. I would guess that you don't have any women who think you raped them. This is probably attributable to having not raped them.
Do you see where I'm going here?

Where are you going, you can do it up front no innuendoes I am not that clever.

OH I see just like the Duke Lacrosse team didn't think anyone would claim that they had raped them right?

This is not even a She Said He Said, that would mean that the difference in their stories would be whether he did what she said or not. He says that he was not even at such a party and no one can put him at such a party both claims.

We will have to see what the new claims are about. I think we will have to wait until Avenetti thinks he will get the greatest attention and or has the chance to delay proceeds further, he is so transparent.

Curtis_Lowe Loc: Georgia

Twardlow wrote:

That’s exactly what we want, but “Soon The Thousand Lies” won’t order one—not a trial as such, but a substantial effort to gain such truth as is responsible and possible.

And Senator Graham is more concerned with protecting K’s sex life and drinking that in his Senatorial Duties.

You can thank Senator Feinstein for the circus, and the lake of an investigation. She should have ordered a quiet investigation when she got the letter with it's "credible" claims, she has people and funds for this and has done it before. That is not the goal here, the goal is delay an otherwise unstoppable process that the Democrats do not want to go forward.

Now you can bring up M. Garland and the Biden rule.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

boberic wrote:

I like the way you folks on the left convict someone because accusations have been made' Ever hear of a trial (of some kind)

Yes! Reminds me of those wanting HRC sent to jail because of her many accusations.

Curtis_Lowe Loc: Georgia

DaveO wrote:

Yes! Reminds me of those wanting HRC sent to jail because of her many accusations.

You are right the FBI (Perter Strzok) gave immunity ahead of time to all her associates and wrote a statement exonerating HRC before her interview. Now I remember that too. So it was inappropriate to chant LOCK HER UP.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Curtis_Lowe wrote:

You are right the FBI (Perter Strzok) gave immunity ahead of time to all her associates and wrote a statement exonerating HRC before her interview. Now I remember that too. So it was inappropriate to chant LOCK HER UP.

The good old Attic! No polarization here!