Expend a years worth of energy: Amazing how much energy is being expended on a camera no one will receive for almost a year? I don't need to say the name, as all keyboards must now...

Kuzano

Amazing how much energy is being expended on a camera no one will receive for almost a year? I don't need to say the name, as all keyboards must now have a hot key combinations for spelling it out.

It's amazing!

ballsafire Loc: Lafayette, Louisiana

I haven't the faintest idea --enlighten me, please.

Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington

We can never know about the days to come
But we think about them anyway
And I wonder if I'm really with you now
Or just chasin' after some finer day

Anticipation, anticipation
Is makin' me late
Is keepin' me waitin'

Carly Simon

tjim Loc: Far Northern California

I have no idea what camera you're talking about....maybe Nikon Z7?
Anyway, I'm just anxious to see how Nikons used market will react. Maybe I can update my D200 for peanuts. Or, maybe not. It still takes dang good pics

MT Shooter Loc: Montana

Kuzano wrote:

Amazing how much energy is being expended on a camera no one will receive for almost a year? I don't need to say the name, as all keyboards must now have a hot key combinations for spelling it out.

It's amazing!

The only ones who wait a year for delivery are the ones who wait 11 months to order!

tjim Loc: Far Northern California

MT Shooter wrote:

The only ones who wait a year for delivery are the ones who wait 11 months to order!

Shutterbug57

tjim wrote:

Maybe I can update my D200 for peanuts. Or, maybe not. It still takes dang good pics

Assuming you have enough light, the D200 does very well.

Bill_de Loc: US

Shutterbug57 wrote:

Assuming you have enough light, the D200 does very well.

That can be said of any camera. Enough is relative.

--

Shutterbug57

Bill_de wrote:

That can be said of any camera. Enough is relative.

--

True enough. I shoot HS sports under the lousy lights and in poorly lit gyms. I jumped from the D200 to the D500 solely because of the ISO capability.

Bill_de Loc: US

Shutterbug57 wrote:

True enough. I shoot HS sports under the lousy lights and in poorly lit gyms. I jumped from the D200 to the D500 solely because of the ISO capability.

Good move for sure. I went from a D300 to a D500 and it was a big difference.

--

tjim Loc: Far Northern California

Bill_de wrote:

That can be said of any camera. Enough is relative.

--

Yep! I'm 75% blind so low light is definitely relative but I'd still love to get my hands on a d500😎😎👍

n3eg Loc: West coast USA

Why should anyone wait? I've been using mirrorless since 2013.

Tom G Loc: Atlanta, GA

Kuzano wrote:

Amazing how much energy is being expended on a camera no one will receive for almost a year? I don't need to say the name, as all keyboards must now have a hot key combinations for spelling it out.

It's amazing!

Yeah Kuzzie, spit it out... What are ya talkin' about?

SAVH Loc: La Jolla, CA

Linda From Maine wrote:

We can never know about the days to come
But we think about them anyway
And I wonder if I'm really with you now
Or just chasin' after some finer day

Anticipation, anticipation
Is makin' me late
Is keepin' me waitin'

Carly Simon

Linda, I was just about to reply to you complementing you on your great verses - then I got to the last line. Even if it is not original with you, it certainly fits the subject. Thanks.
Scotty