hassighedgehog wrote:
Only time I went to Hawaii had about 15 to 20 rolls of film to develop, not enough money left to do all at once, so took about a month to get all done. Found at least 2 36 roll that were exposed as ASA 64, but film was ASA 25. But were fairly sharp. Underexposure made the colors very saturated.
After a few times with paying for prints that were bad (and money was tight in those days) I changed to slides for most of my film... then selectively print later.
Someone mentioned their old film cameras... wish I could be sure but I think my 1st 35mm, in 1965/66 was a Peitri 7S (? spelling) in Viet Nam. I do remember my 2nd 35mm, a Canon Ftb in Germany in 1969 or 70.
About as long as it takes me to get home and shove the card into my computer!!
Don
Back in the early 70's, while going to school in Dallas, I did a stint with "Snap Shots Inc" and we processed several thousand rolls each night. I'm amazed there were so few screw ups... I was also amazed at what folks photographed...
Thorny Devil wrote:
Or worse, you send a roll of film away to be processed and the lab loses them. I had this happen when I was living in the UK in 1971. I sent a roll of 36 to Kodak transparencies for processing and was quite excited when I received the box of slides in the post only to find after opening them that they were not mine. Sent them back to Kodak with a note, their response was that the probable reason for not receiving mine was that I had either not filled out the return address correctly or at all. I went back to Kodak and asked them how could I receive someone elses slides in the package with my address if I had not entered the correct address. Eventually Kodak apologised and sent me two unexposed rolls of film as compensation. They did not respond to my letter when I cheekily
requested reimbursement for travel expenses to return to the place at which I had taken the photos - not that I expected a response but it helped to subdue my annoyance.
Or worse, you send a roll of film away to be proce... (
show quote)
Back in the early 60s I went to Scotland for two years as a missionary for the LDS Church. I took a half-frame, 35mm, Olympus Pen camera. I had several rolls of 36 exposure slide film and so I got 72 shots from each roll. In two years i used a lot more than the two rolls i took with me. I shots my brains out with that camera (I still have it and it still works). Living on $100 a month at the time I could not afford to have the film processed over there, so when I had several rolls shot I would send them home to my mom, who had them developed into slides. I did not see those images for months and years. Today I have several trays of those dear slides. Great memories. I was blessed with a camera that took great pictures even when I did not know what i was doing at the time.
I remember. Forty years ago I traveled to hard-to-reach places in Central America, photos being uppermost for me. Film was expensive so I couldn't afford much bracketing. 'Had to wait until reaching civilization to get film developed, and was often disappointed. Hoping for good pictures, I'd get a few if I was careful and lucky; the rest were often mediocre. How I wish I'd had digital capacity then, so I could check on the spot---never dreamed a time like this would come so soon after!. 'Born too early, maybe. I count my blessings today, but treasure the memories of yesteryear! I remember.
autry
Loc: Ashland, VA. - Center of The Universe
MY daughter worked with a girl who hired a Pro photographer to shoot her wedding. The next day the Pro called and said he didn't have film in the camera. I was sharing this true story again this last weekend and a lady said she did the same thing at her sons birthday..
DickC
Loc: NE Washington state
Yep, so true....until I got my darkroom!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.