Vector wrote:
Hi all,
I am getting married this summer and we will be doing an Alaskan cruise for the honeymoon. I expect there will be many photographic opportunities and want to be prepared but not (overly) weighed down. I shoot with a Canon 7DII and the following long lenses: A fish eye (I forget what brand), Tamron 16- 300, Sigma 120- 400, and the following Canon lenses: 10- 20, 17-55 f2.8, 15-85, 24-70 f2.8, 70- 200 f2.8, and 70- 300. I have some primes (30, 50, 85mm).
I was contemplating getting the Tamron 18-400 (and selling the 16-300) but wasn't able to get a definitive answer as to if the change was really worth it. Thoughts? Any and all feedback (besides taking them all- grin) is appreciated.
Hi all, br br I am getting married this summer an... (
show quote)
Honestly, I believe you have quite an adequate supply of lens with a variety of reaches and the 18-400 only exceeds the maximum reach in your current arsenal by 100mm. I recommend that you save your money, save your time, and enjoy more of the moments of your new marriage which no amount of photography can capture. Take a note from Joel Sartore who has stated that sometimes you should just put the camera down and enjoy the moment. While it is so very tempting because of the trip, try your best to not turn your honeymoon into a photo shoot excursion. Just my opinion...