Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Astronomical Photography Forum
This is a test
Jun 24, 2018 11:04:14   #
Streets Loc: Euless, TX.
 
What could be a better test of a lens' C.A. than the limb of the moon? This shot of the moon through my 600mm Sigma mirror lens(paid $150.00 for it)shows NO C.A. and extreme sharpness. My sky is filthy and highly light polluted, as I live two miles from DFW Airport and exactly between Dallas and Ft. Worth. On the clearest of nights, Polaris is invisible. I have owned Takahashi scopes, for which I paid over $2000.00 which could not produce this level of APO quality. The Sigma is the equivalent of an 86mm Maksutov. Lots of bang for the buck don't you think?


(Download)

Reply
Jun 24, 2018 13:51:14   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
Streets wrote:
What could be a better test of a lens' C.A. than the limb of the moon? This shot of the moon through my 600mm Sigma mirror lens(paid $150.00 for it)shows NO C.A. and extreme sharpness. My sky is filthy and highly light polluted, as I live two miles from DFW Airport and exactly between Dallas and Ft. Worth. On the clearest of nights, Polaris is invisible. I have owned Takahashi scopes, for which I paid over $2000.00 which could not produce this level of APO quality. The Sigma is the equivalent of an 86mm Maksutov. Lots of bang for the buck don't you think?
What could be a better test of a lens' C.A. than t... (show quote)


FYI - Mirror lenses are not susceptible to CA.

Anyway, nice looking shot.

Reply
Jun 24, 2018 16:56:22   #
Streets Loc: Euless, TX.
 
The optical path of my Sigma 600mm Mirror lens has refractive element(s) at the camera end. Could this produce C.A. in some cases?

Reply
 
 
Jun 24, 2018 17:47:20   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
Streets wrote:
The optical path of my Sigma 600mm Mirror lens has refractive element(s) at the camera end. Could this produce C.A. in some cases?


Don't know the correct answer for that question. I have two mirror lenses: Minolta 500mm Reflex and the Tamron 500 Reflex. I have never seen any sign of CA with either one.

The Minolta has AF with Sony bodies and does a really good job at getting a good focus. But manual focus is just not very easy with that lens.

The Tamron is only manual focus and has very nice manual focusing.

Reply
Jun 24, 2018 18:11:52   #
Europa Loc: West Hills, CA
 
Streets wrote:
What could be a better test of a lens' C.A. than the limb of the moon? This shot of the moon through my 600mm Sigma mirror lens(paid $150.00 for it)shows NO C.A. and extreme sharpness. My sky is filthy and highly light polluted, as I live two miles from DFW Airport and exactly between Dallas and Ft. Worth. On the clearest of nights, Polaris is invisible. I have owned Takahashi scopes, for which I paid over $2000.00 which could not produce this level of APO quality. The Sigma is the equivalent of an 86mm Maksutov. Lots of bang for the buck don't you think?
What could be a better test of a lens' C.A. than t... (show quote)


Looks like a lot of bang for the buck, nice shot.

Reply
Jun 26, 2018 03:30:01   #
Ed Greding Loc: Texas
 
Prime focus photography is done without a lens, thus no chromatic aberration.

Reply
Jun 26, 2018 08:19:14   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
Ed Greding wrote:
Prime focus photography is done without a lens, thus no chromatic aberration.


Prime focus is not the reason for no CA. In the case of mirror scopes, they don't generate CA. But for refractor type scopes, an Apochromatic "APO" type is needed. My refractor I use for Astrophotography is a APO type scope which means that the objective is a carefully designed triplet lens combination with extra low dispersion type glass in the middle to control the CA. Cheaper scopes use cheaper objectives and can produce CA, even when used as a prime lens.

Reply
 
 
Jun 26, 2018 21:47:29   #
bwana Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
 
Streets wrote:
What could be a better test of a lens' C.A. than the limb of the moon? This shot of the moon through my 600mm Sigma mirror lens(paid $150.00 for it)shows NO C.A. and extreme sharpness. My sky is filthy and highly light polluted, as I live two miles from DFW Airport and exactly between Dallas and Ft. Worth. On the clearest of nights, Polaris is invisible. I have owned Takahashi scopes, for which I paid over $2000.00 which could not produce this level of APO quality. The Sigma is the equivalent of an 86mm Maksutov. Lots of bang for the buck don't you think?
What could be a better test of a lens' C.A. than t... (show quote)

I have the 2nd version of this reflex lens. Reasonable image quality but bloody hard to get a good focus! The price is right!!

bwa

Reply
Jun 27, 2018 16:39:16   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
Streets wrote:
What could be a better test of a lens' C.A. than the limb of the moon? This shot of the moon through my 600mm Sigma mirror lens(paid $150.00 for it)shows NO C.A. and extreme sharpness. My sky is filthy and highly light polluted, as I live two miles from DFW Airport and exactly between Dallas and Ft. Worth. On the clearest of nights, Polaris is invisible. I have owned Takahashi scopes, for which I paid over $2000.00 which could not produce this level of APO quality. The Sigma is the equivalent of an 86mm Maksutov. Lots of bang for the buck don't you think?
What could be a better test of a lens' C.A. than t... (show quote)

Very nicely done with a camera Lens.
Craig

Reply
Jul 9, 2018 16:19:13   #
Streets Loc: Euless, TX.
 
Here's how it works by adding a Rokunar 1.4X teleconverter. Lens +teleconverter= 820mm. Price paid for set-up=$200.00. There does appear to be a trace of C.A. on the left edge, but it's not a big problem. Since the Moon is all shades of gray, simply desaturating the image would remove the C.A.


(Download)

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Astronomical Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.