Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Tripod?
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
Jun 16, 2018 18:28:22   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
Meganephron wrote:
Neither the Pixi or Gorillapod is recommended for the size of your equipment. A compact carbon fiber tripod weighs 3.5 lbs and fits in a backpack


The OP's 5300 body with the big lens weighs about 2 pounds. (Reference: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1349921-REG/nikon_1579b_d_5300_dslr_camera_w_af_p.html)

The Manfrotto PIXI EVO Mini is rated at 5.5 pounds. The "3K" Gorillapods are rated at 6.6 pounds and the "5K" Gorillapods are rated at 11 pounds.

Reply
Jun 16, 2018 20:34:59   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
bsprague wrote:
The OP's 5300 body with the big lens weighs about 2 pounds. (Reference: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1349921-REG/nikon_1579b_d_5300_dslr_camera_w_af_p.html)

The Manfrotto PIXI EVO Mini is rated at 5.5 pounds. The "3K" Gorillapods are rated at 6.6 pounds and the "5K" Gorillapods are rated at 11 pounds.


None of these will be steady enough to quiet down a 300mm lens on a D5300. It's not about load capacity - it's about stability, and load capacity does not predict stability. A stable tripod will far exceed the load capacity of just about anything you want to put on it. But top tube thickness, a criterion used by Gitzo, RRS, Induro, Feisol, Sirui, etc - and any other company that makes that data readily available - is a far better indicator of stability.

This is why I would never suggest the ultralightweight cheap stuff. You are usually better off hand holding and relying on VR.

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 00:09:07   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
Gene51,

When it comes to ultimate stability, you win.

What do you recommend for a traveler that want to improve stability where tripods are awkward, inappropriate to travel and maybe not allowed at all?

Reply
 
 
Jun 17, 2018 05:46:18   #
John N Loc: HP14 3QF Stokenchurch, UK
 
Make sure the tripod and head will handle well above the weight of your camera and heaviest lens, perhaps a 100%. Might be best to look for 2nd hand quality than splash out for lesser specced new. Or see if you can rent one out there - save a lot of hassle travelling. I use a GIOTTO CF model and ball head (MTL8361B & MH1311). Don't think they're manufactured anymore, but a knowledgable sage at a show thought you got a lot of bang for your buck. Something similar would meet your needs admirably, I think.

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 06:08:17   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
bsprague wrote:
Gene51,

When it comes to ultimate stability, you win.

What do you recommend for a traveler that want to improve stability where tripods are awkward, inappropriate to travel and maybe not allowed at all?


I'd love to have a Gitzo Series 2 Carbon. But on fixed income, it would be too costly at $900 plus the cost of a head.

So I use a Feisol CT-3442, which is $420 plus a head.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8jp7h36kSY

http://www.feisol.com/0823tripodsdetails-5.html

Having rented Gitzo tripods in the past, I found the CT-3442 lighter, just as stable, and a very good value, without needing to make a compromise in stabililty.

I first became acquainted with Feisol when you could only order directly from China in 2006. I had purchased a Gitzo Systematic Series 3, and though it was a great tripod it was not stable with a long lens (500mm at the time). So I sent it back and pre-ordered the Feisol CT-3472. When I received it I used it with my 500mm lens and D200 DX camera, and I continue to use it whenever I do macro and closeup, and with my 600mm F4 which I use when the light is challenging or I need to use a 1.4TC.

The CT-3442 is about the lightest, most stable tripod that will fit in carry on luggage that fits in an overhead compartment. It folds down to a little under 20" yet when fully extended I don't have to stoop to look through the viewfinder. I am 5'11".

And though for some reason people still believe that load capacity has anything to do with stability, they may want to read something that dispels that myth.

http://www.reallyrightstuff.com/tripod-guide

A tripod that is stable enough to use with a long lens or for macro (high magnification work in either case), will most certainly far exceed the load capacity, usually by a fact of 3 or more. Load capacity is not a good criterion for tripod selection at all. My CT-3442 has a load capacity of 55 lbs, but I will need to be very careful using it with anything longer than 300mm on a full frame camera, even though the load may only be about 7 lbs.

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 06:16:05   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
rmalarz wrote:
Mefoto offers a number of different tripods and they are not outrageously expensive. https://www.mefoto.com/
--Bob


Exactly, look at the 4 section 190 series. Very sturdy, light and easily fit in a small suitcase but extends easily for a 6' person to use.

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 06:52:53   #
wildweasel
 
I spent the last several weeks researching carbon fiber tripods and finally settled on this one and this ball head. I have tried it with my D750 with a battery grip and Tamron 150-600 G2 lens and it handles it fine. The rest of my photog friends have been equally impressed and are considering the same tripod.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00Z17U5ZW/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004QC3COO/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Reply
 
 
Jun 17, 2018 06:58:37   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
frjeff wrote:
Newb here shooting D5300.
Have a six week trip in Sept/Oct to Australia and New Zealand.
I am almost 74 and do not have the steadiest hands.
Have been convinced by UHH mentors that my current lens inventory is fine for my newbie ness (kit 18-55, 70-300VR and 35 f/1.8 prime).
But, I am wondering about a tripod purchase. Most of the landscape info I have read and YouTubed strongly suggests a tripod for this type of photography.
However, I am concerned about the significant travel (flights, autos, trains) and how best to lug around such a piece of equipment.

Thoughts, please on this matter (necessity, brands, models, etc.)
Newb here shooting D5300. br Have a six week trip ... (show quote)


NO TRIPODS ON TRIPS. You are much better off setting your camera speed to 1/1000 sec.(use shutter priority at 1/1000 sec. and use auto ISO )to take care of your unsteady hands. A tripod will just get in the way, you will not enjoy yourself and you will get better shots without a tripod or monopod. Travel lite, travel right.

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 07:20:27   #
Blaster34 Loc: Florida Treasure Coast
 
billnikon wrote:
NO TRIPODS ON TRIPS. You are much better off setting your camera speed to 1/1000 sec.(use shutter priority at 1/1000 sec. and use auto ISO )to take care of your unsteady hands. A tripod will just get in the way, you will not enjoy yourself and you will get better shots without a tripod or monopod. Travel lite, travel right.



Reply
Jun 17, 2018 07:24:40   #
johnst1001a Loc: West Chester, Ohio
 
I tried a monopod and found it to be very difficult to hold in position while trying to shoot. I am far better off increasing the shutter speed to reduce camera shake then go with a monopod. If I can't get a good picture due to low light, I either get one of my f1.4 primes or simply find something else to shoot, use a flash, or reframe the shot in better light.

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 07:25:06   #
Nikonman44
 
frjeff wrote:
Newb here shooting D5300.
Have a six week trip in Sept/Oct to Australia and New Zealand.
I am almost 74 and do not have the steadiest hands.
Have been convinced by UHH mentors that my current lens inventory is fine for my newbie ness (kit 18-55, 70-300VR and 35 f/1.8 prime).
But, I am wondering about a tripod purchase. Most of the landscape info I have read and YouTubed strongly suggests a tripod for this type of photography.
However, I am concerned about the significant travel (flights, autos, trains) and how best to lug around such a piece of equipment.

Thoughts, please on this matter (necessity, brands, models, etc.)
Newb here shooting D5300. br Have a six week trip ... (show quote)


Mono pod might be your answer. Plan B go to the foto shop and try a few models. What is perfect for others might not get to first base with you.

Have a lot of fun "Down Under"

Reply
 
 
Jun 17, 2018 07:56:47   #
sergio
 
take a monopod! it will help you waking too.

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 08:09:57   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
[quote=Gene51]I'd love to have a Gitzo Series 2 Carbon. But on fixed income, it would be too costly at $900 plus the cost of a head.

So I use a Feisol CT-3442, which is $420 plus a head.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8jp7h36kSY

http://www.feisol.com/0823tripodsdetails-5.html

http://www.reallyrightstuff.com/tripod-guide

Thanks for the links.

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 08:14:19   #
LCD
 
Whatever you get, buy it well in advance of your trip. Then practice, practice, practice. Connecting, setting up, using and breaking down aren't nearly as as the pros demonstrate when you are new to it. You don't want to waste any of your overseas time learning stuff you could have learned beforehand.

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 08:19:00   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Meganephron wrote:
I find monopods to be very unstable and often require a second brace point which may not always be available. Although a monopod with a quick release ball can be a walking stick.

I use a MeFoto monopod / walking stick to stabilize my birding kit {4.65-crop Pentax Q-7 + 70-300 Sigma lens}. I find that I need nothing else.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.