currently investigating parts modeling and body doubling, she wanted some shots showing her butt and legs. the tattoo greatly reduce the chances of getting such work..
Tough break. Not that easy to retouch that area.
interesting style … visually similar to the mid '80s ?
Hal81
Loc: Bucks County, Pa.
I see she has a tramp stamp.
Fotoartist wrote:
Tough break. Not that easy to retouch that area.
Correct. Most clients would simply choose a girl without ink. especially to shoot a catalog, where there would be many photos.
Snapheal would get rid of that tattoo, as if it were never there. Would take about 30 seconds.
Nice shot--too bad about the tattoo.
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
currently investigating parts modeling and body doubling, she wanted some shots showing her butt and legs. the tattoo greatly reduce the chances of getting such work..
She wants a leg/butt shot then covers both🧐🧐🧐🧐
BboH
Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
I usually don't are for tats but in this case with the colors and design of the clothing I think it adds a nice touch.
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
currently investigating parts modeling and body doubling, she wanted some shots showing her butt and legs. the tattoo greatly reduce the chances of getting such work..
This photo does nothing for either. Get rid of the stockings (are they covering more tatoos?) and turn her sideways a bit
Tramp stamps were popular for a time.
I have no problem with the ink. In fact staged a different way, this photo could have emphasized the tat with a more bold pose, and showed off legs & butt more prominently. Maybe a leg spread, hands on the wall kind of pose, or something similar. My question is why are the legs covered more than 50% if wanted photos of them? (Although her legs look very skinny unless the photo was stretched).
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.