Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon 80-200 / f2.8 D vs. G?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jun 6, 2018 09:41:48   #
JWCoop
 
I use a Nikon 300S with a Nikon 24-70 / f2.8 as my walk-around outfit.

Now have a need for the extra length. Cannot justify (to "Mama") the extra expense of the new versions.

Cropped sensor works great for me, and the 24-70 is substantially better than what I originally bought with the 300S.

The D versions are available substantially less than Gs.

Here are the questions for those who have used both: (1) what is the actual difference between the two? (2) can I expect the image quality of either of these two to be comparable to the 24-70?

No need to comment on FF vs. Cropped. I am up on that.

I once owned a DX 70-300 which was "okay." Gave it away to our daughter.

What do you think?

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 09:45:12   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
80-200 being the old focal length as opposed to the new Nikon 70-200 now?

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 09:47:58   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
I think he needs to look at "D" version vs "G". The D works for many.

Reply
 
 
Jun 6, 2018 10:07:41   #
JWCoop
 
80-200 D vs. 70-200 G. Both f2.8.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 10:14:08   #
Kuzano
 
This was just covered in a similar post today.

Ken Rockwell covers both quite well in that post, and he explains G as gelded (no physical aperture ring on the lens-in my book a problem for perceived control issues). But, as a rule G lenses do not Manual Focus.

One review, the G:

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/28200g.htm

the other:

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/28200af.htm

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 10:21:04   #
JWCoop
 
Thanks, but not the lens. Looking at the 2.8.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 10:27:55   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
Kuzano wrote:
This was just covered in a similar post today.

Ken Rockwell covers both quite well in that post, and he explains G as gelded (no physical aperture ring on the lens-in my book a problem for perceived control issues). But, as a rule G lenses do not Manual Focus.

One review, the G:

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/28200g.htm

the other:

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/28200af.htm

The op is asking about the 80-200 2.8 lenses.
I had the second version, the AF with a push-pull zoom.
While it was incredibly sharp, I’d go with a newer model with separate zoom/focus rings.
I used mine on the D200 and 300.
The earlier models can be had for a relatively low price, but they have no VR and focus a bit slower than the newer, 70-200 models.
If you’re shooting daytime sports, the VR isn’t much help, but I really make use of the VR at some events I shoot.


https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/80-200mm-history.htm

Reply
 
 
Jun 6, 2018 10:45:16   #
JWCoop
 
That is extremely helpful. Thanks!

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 11:27:37   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
JWCoop wrote:
That is extremely helpful. Thanks!


Several for sale on the Fred Miranda website.
Great place to buy and sell used
Example here for $495
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1545429/0?keyword=Nikon,80-200#14474183
Easy to sign up as a member to contact seller.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 11:42:22   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
JWCoop wrote:
I use a Nikon 300S with a Nikon 24-70 / f2.8 as my walk-around outfit.
Now have a need for the extra length. Cannot justify (to "Mama") the extra expense of the new versions.
Cropped sensor works great for me, and the 24-70 is substantially better than what I originally bought with the 300S.
The D versions are available substantially less than Gs.
Here are the questions for those who have used both: (1) what is the actual difference between the two? (2) can I expect the image quality of either of these two to be comparable to the 24-70?
I use a Nikon 300S with a Nikon 24-70 / f2.8 as my... (show quote)

I can find no reference to an 80~200 G lens. And which of the four 80~200 D versions are you talking about?

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 17:03:33   #
JWCoop
 
70-200 G. Whichever is the preferred D lenses which are 80-200.

Reply
 
 
Jun 6, 2018 19:23:25   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
JWCoop wrote:
Whichever is the preferred D lenses which are 80-200.

With 5 ED elements (vs. 3 for the others), the Nikon ED AF-S 80~200mm 1:2.8 D produces the best image quality. Plus, the built-in focus motor is faster and quieter.

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 19:55:25   #
JWCoop
 
Thanks!

Reply
Jun 6, 2018 21:29:28   #
brucewells Loc: Central Kentucky
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
The op is asking about the 80-200 2.8 lenses.
I had the second version, the AF with a push-pull zoom.
While it was incredibly sharp, I’d go with a newer model with separate zoom/focus rings.
I used mine on the D200 and 300.
The earlier models can be had for a relatively low price, but they have no VR and focus a bit slower than the newer, 70-200 models.
If you’re shooting daytime sports, the VR isn’t much help, but I really make use of the VR at some events I shoot.


https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/80-200mm-history.htm
The op is asking about the 80-200 2.8 lenses. br I... (show quote)



Reply
Jun 6, 2018 23:39:28   #
CaptainC Loc: Colorado, south of Denver
 
Kuzano wrote:
This was just covered in a similar post today.

Ken Rockwell covers both quite well in that post, and he explains G as gelded (no physical aperture ring on the lens-in my book a problem for perceived control issues). But, as a rule G lenses do not Manual Focus.

One review, the G:

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/28200g.htm

the other:

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/28200af.htm


Any lens will manually focus. I believe you mean you cannot manually adjust the aperture as there is no aperture ring.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.