Test shots stacking the 1.4 and 2x extenders
May 29, 2018 23:24:58 #
Test shots with a Canon 1dmk4 stacking the 1.4 & 2x extenders with 70-200 2.8 lens.
St Louis Zoo
Farm
1D MK4
May 29, 2018 23:33:50 #
Impressive. Like the sharpness shown. Can you provide the distance at which you were shooting at? Also the depth of field you expected? Mahalo for sharing.
May 29, 2018 23:47:29 #
mwsilvers
Loc: Central New Jersey
jim quist wrote:
Test shots with a Canon 1dmk4 stacking the 1.4 & 2x extenders with 70-200 2.8 lens.
Pretty good considering they were stacked. I do wonder if they will tend to fall apart a bit at higher resolution. Could you post them again and check store original? It would also be nice to be able to see the EXIF data.
May 30, 2018 00:38:45 #
JoAnneK01 wrote:
Impressive. Like the sharpness shown. Can you provide the distance at which you were shooting at? Also the depth of field you expected? Mahalo for sharing.
I used to photograph collegiate sports so I am trying to imagine them from the end zone into the field. 1st image 50 yards? 2nd image 80 yards?
With water all around the one and the trees at a close distance behind the other I wasn't thinking about death of field.
May 30, 2018 00:40:45 #
mwsilvers wrote:
Pretty good considering they were stacked. I do wonder if they will tend to fall apart a bit at higher resolution. Could you post them again and check store original? It would also be nice to be able to see the EXIF data.
Here you go
I looked at the exif info and it only recognized one of the extenders. However, both extenders were used.
May 30, 2018 02:35:29 #
mwsilvers
Loc: Central New Jersey
jim quist wrote:
Here you go
I looked at the exif info and it only recognized one of the extenders. However, both extenders were used.
I looked at the exif info and it only recognized one of the extenders. However, both extenders were used.
Even though you set them as store original they are still low resolution versions of the images. Can you post high resolution versions?
May 30, 2018 06:09:14 #
mwsilvers wrote:
Even though you set them as store original they are still low resolution versions of the images. Can you post high resolution versions?
The two download versions are 640-pixels on the long side are just thumbnails. Seems like you've got a good story to tell. But, these images at the resolution of a thumbnail do not tell any story at all.
May 30, 2018 08:18:21 #
jackpinoh
Loc: Kettering, OH 45419
jim quist wrote:
Test shots with a Canon 1dmk4 stacking the 1.4 & 2x extenders with 70-200 2.8 lens.
The pictures you posted look soft even at the small size you posted. OK for posting on the internet to an uncritical audience, but likely blurry when printed at 4"x6" or larger.
May 30, 2018 10:22:52 #
I've tried that also. Only the extender closest to the camera body is recognized. I have the series III TC's which require an extension tube to join them together. Manual focus only. Link to Flickr photo: https://www.flickr.com/photos/136435824@N03/39898233120/in/dateposted/
May 30, 2018 10:32:10 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
The two download versions are 640-pixels on the long side are just thumbnails. Seems like you've got a good story to tell. But, these images at the resolution of a thumbnail do not tell any story at all.
..
May 30, 2018 10:45:21 #
jackpinoh wrote:
The pictures you posted look soft even at the small size you posted. OK for posting on the internet to an uncritical audience, but likely blurry when printed at 4"x6" or larger.
I make greeting cards with my images, and for that this will work fine.
May 30, 2018 10:56:43 #
mwsilvers wrote:
Even though you set them as store original they are still low resolution versions of the images. Can you post high resolution versions?
Here's high Resolutions for you
May 30, 2018 11:04:30 #
jim quist wrote:
Here's high Resolutions for you
F-stop ? wide open ?
Hand held or with support ?? .....thanks
..
May 30, 2018 11:17:50 #
the point is that quality lens/extender combos can deliver good to great images. check you tube if you doubt.
May 30, 2018 11:34:05 #
Karl's Bird Photography wrote:
I've tried that also. Only the extender closest to the camera body is recognized. I have the series III TC's which require an extension tube to join them together. Manual focus only. Link to Flickr photo: https://www.flickr.com/photos/136435824@N03/39898233120/in/dateposted/
With mine the 1.4 was closest to the camera but it only read the 2x. It will auto focus but it jumps in and out of focus until it locks on. With the Hasselblad's all I had was fully manual so I don't mind manually focusing, sometimes I prefer it.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.