Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
DX vs. FX
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
May 21, 2018 16:45:16   #
StuartTankenbaum
 
Is there a great advantage to FX vs. DX for showing details in the shadow areas and light areas?

Reply
May 21, 2018 17:12:32   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Yes!!!
--Bob
StuartTankenbaum wrote:
Is there a great advantage to FX vs. DX for showing details in the shadow areas and light areas?

Reply
May 21, 2018 17:40:20   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
StuartTankenbaum wrote:
Is there a great advantage to FX vs. DX for showing details in the shadow areas and light areas?


Most definitely. Larger sensors ALWAYS outperform smaller ones in this arena.

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2018 17:44:00   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
Yes.

Reply
May 21, 2018 19:15:08   #
repleo Loc: Boston
 
Yes - but not always. Some of the better newer APS-C cameras have better dynamic range than some of the earlier full frame cameras. For cameras of the same generation, the difference is typically in the one to one and a half stop range.

Reply
May 21, 2018 19:30:59   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
repleo wrote:
Yes - but not always. Some of the better newer APS-C cameras have better dynamic range than some of the earlier full frame cameras. For cameras of the same generation, the difference is typically in the one to one and a half stop range.


Any serious comparison would be about same-generation cameras.
So what is your point?

Reply
May 21, 2018 19:50:06   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
StuartTankenbaum wrote:
Is there a great advantage to FX vs. DX for showing details in the shadow areas and light areas?


Generally speaking -yes- there is an advantage - the magnitude of the advantage may be application/situation specific and may not always be a "great" advantage. I would label this a niche advantage.

..

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2018 20:21:43   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
Since you were smart enough to be specific, "...for showing details in the shadow areas and light areas." I can't think of any answer other than YES!

--

Reply
May 21, 2018 20:37:10   #
repleo Loc: Boston
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
Any serious comparison would be about same-generation cameras.
So what is your point?


Clarification.

Reply
May 21, 2018 20:40:33   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
Any serious comparison would be about same-generation cameras.
So what is your point?


A canon 5d mark2 has the same dr as the m4/3 EM1. You could be right, but why assume that the OP is getting the latest FF camera?

Reply
May 21, 2018 20:45:37   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
tdekany wrote:
A canon 5d mark2 has the same dr as the m4/3 EM1. You could be right, but why assume that the OP is getting the latest FF camera?


My ten year old FX camera is not as good as my brand new DX camera.
Which one should I use?

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2018 20:47:35   #
BebuLamar
 
Greatest advantage you don't care about the crop factor.

Reply
May 21, 2018 21:00:24   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
My ten year old FX camera is not as good as my brand new DX camera.
Which one should I use?


There is nothing wrong with being corrected.

Reply
May 22, 2018 01:34:59   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
StuartTankenbaum wrote:
Is there a great advantage to FX vs. DX for showing details in the shadow areas and light areas?


Oh absolutely. The detail you get in an Full Frame camera for landscapes is just amazing vs a crop body.

Reply
May 22, 2018 02:21:22   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
Oh absolutely. The detail you get in an Full Frame camera for landscapes is just amazing vs a crop body.


There are a few exceptions - hi res mode from 4 m4/3 cameras exceed any FF camera. But that is expected from 64 and 80mp files.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.