Still vs. Video Cameras
May 10, 2018 07:29:46 #
The Villages
Loc: The Villages, Florida
Just wondering. What are your thoughts.
Do you think that DSLR camera manufacturers will ever get back to producing products that shoot Stills only?
There seem to be numerous comments made by members that they are not interested in and never use the video components of cameras. Yes, its nice to have just in case, but doesn't adding video increase the purchase price for something that is really not used by many, as well as (maybe) taking away from the research & development that could go toward Still photography?
I've never shot video, but from what I've read the results produced by DSLRs do not nearly provide the results that can be achieved by a true video camera.
Do you think that DSLR camera manufacturers will ever get back to producing products that shoot Stills only?
There seem to be numerous comments made by members that they are not interested in and never use the video components of cameras. Yes, its nice to have just in case, but doesn't adding video increase the purchase price for something that is really not used by many, as well as (maybe) taking away from the research & development that could go toward Still photography?
I've never shot video, but from what I've read the results produced by DSLRs do not nearly provide the results that can be achieved by a true video camera.
May 10, 2018 07:32:14 #
The Villages wrote:
Just wondering. What are your thoughts. br br Do ... (show quote)
The Nikon Df has no video, it is still photography only.
May 10, 2018 07:37:26 #
Mac wrote:
The Nikon Df has no video, it is still photography only.
And that is the way it should be.
May 10, 2018 07:58:36 #
The Villages
Loc: The Villages, Florida
Mac wrote:
The Nikon Df has no video, it is still photography only.
Yes, but I don't think that there are many current day DSLRs that fall into that category.
May 10, 2018 08:08:40 #
The Villages wrote:
....
I've never shot video, but from what I've read the results produced by DSLRs do not nearly provide the results that can be achieved by a true video camera.
I've never shot video, but from what I've read the results produced by DSLRs do not nearly provide the results that can be achieved by a true video camera.
One advantage DSLR’s and larger sensored mirrorless have over a traditional camcorder is the ability to isolate the subject from the background.
The larger sensor, combined with faster lenses give you much more shallow depth of field over the camcorder.
DSLR’s have been used for scenes in some major movies.
It’s a very distinctive look.
May 10, 2018 08:26:34 #
The Villages wrote:
Yes, but I don't think that there are many current day DSLRs that fall into that category.
I don't think there are many either, for all I know the Df might be the only one. But you asked about still only and I let you know about the one I know of.
I don't think we will see two versions of the same camera, one with video and another version that is still only. It probably doesn't cost much extra to add video capability and adding video gives another feature to put on the the sales brochure.
For what it's worth, I use a Df. It is smaller and lighter than most other DSLRs, it feels good in my hands and it gives great results.There is no video, pop-up flash, full Auto, or scene modes.
It is not a camera for everyone and it doesn't try to be.
May 10, 2018 08:47:57 #
The Villages wrote:
Just wondering. What are your thoughts. br br Do ... (show quote)
Video capability adds just about nothing to the price of a camera. All the necessary components are already there, except for the on/off button and a bit of firmware. That slight extra cost, if any really, is more then worth it to the manufacturers in order to keep happy those that use the video function.
As far as quality, entire movies have been made using DSLR's such as the Canon 5DII. The results have been excellent.
I never shoot video. I just ignore the function. My toaster has capabilities I never use. Just about anything electronic does. The reason is that it is so cheap and easy to add functions to today's electronic devices. Why worry about it. Ignore what you don't need or use.
May 10, 2018 21:14:17 #
Shooting video adds a whole new dimension to photography, namely sound and motion. Editing a 4 minute video takes me about a day. Post processing a still photo takes me about 5 minutes. When the internet started there was just texts. As technology improved they added graphics. Eventually it was possible to view video. Would anyone want a computer that can't display video? A digital camera is a computer.
May 10, 2018 22:00:48 #
Mac wrote:
I don't think there are many either, for all I kno... (show quote)
The DF costs more than some comparable DSLRs that do have the extra features. The camera makers wouldn't be able to charge less for a camera by leaving off the video.
May 11, 2018 00:47:12 #
Releasing a model without the video components actually adds to the cost, as it requires a redesign of the basic circuitry which is used in all the cameras. Of course the manufacturer could simply remove user access controls to the already present video feature, but there's hardly much point to that... it's like intentionally crippling a camera.
And then there are many people who like using DSLR cameras specifically for the video feature, especially vloggers. Camera manufacturers don't want to lose that section of the market.
And then there are many people who like using DSLR cameras specifically for the video feature, especially vloggers. Camera manufacturers don't want to lose that section of the market.
May 11, 2018 06:16:23 #
LarryFitz
Loc: Beacon NY
All of the dslr cameras have the hardware to support video. It is just a small amount of firmware that is needed to get the video. Whether a camera supports video or not it's more of a marketing position call. I expect that customer base for lower end cameras is expanded because that have video. For high end cameras the customer base will not change if it has video. They may even loss some purests.
May 11, 2018 07:31:42 #
The Villages wrote:
br br There seem to be numerous comments made by... (show quote)
No adding video doesn't increase the purchase price as you can see the Nikon Df doesn't have video and it's not cheap. If you think video is nice just in case then a camera without video is not for you. A still only video is for people who think no video is better than with video and willing to pay for that.
For the people who use DSLR for video often they think it's better than a video only camera at the same price.
May 11, 2018 07:36:11 #
mwsilvers
Loc: Central New Jersey
The Villages wrote:
Just wondering. What are your thoughts. br br Do ... (show quote)
The answer to your first question is no. There's no reason to take video out of DSLR type cameras since it doesn't cost that much extra to put it in. Secondly, in terms of quality of output, DSLR and mirrorless
DSLR type cameras produce professional results that are used in movies and TV everyday. To significantly improve on the output of the best DSLR and mirrorless camera videos you would need professional level cinema cameras and lenses, from companies like Canon, that cost tens of thousands of dollars.
May 11, 2018 07:59:57 #
ToBoldlyGo
Loc: London U.K.
The Villages wrote:
Just wondering. What are your thoughts. br br Do ... (show quote)
Without needing to read the east of the thread first, no, firstly, the ones who do it now will continue to improve it, the market does demand it. Secondly, if anything the price of a DSLR has come down over years in relative terms. Account for inflation, and you are getting a bargain compared to what was available for the price 10 years ago. Thirdly, your final point is just wrong. Sony DSLR's were used alongside pro film cameras for filming A Street Cat Named Bob. The director even said that in testing, the quality was identical to the pro cameras. So enjoy your at least broadcast quality video, it's basically free.😊
May 11, 2018 08:03:28 #
ToBoldlyGo
Loc: London U.K.
Kmgw9v wrote:
And that is the way it should be.
In general, or for the DF only?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.