First, the disclaimer. After reading Cat's interesting post recently about light, I want to point out that right now I am from the REHess school. I take shots to share interesting things (in this case the beauty of Bryce), but I am not a "photographer." These shots are from a day and one-half trip to Bryce to show my brother-in law his new state. They were taken under available conditions. The nearest things to a "photograph" was the sunrise (#1). This is the result of getting to Sunrise Point at 5:30 am for the 6:15 sunrise. I discovered that the sun does not become visible at the point until 6:50. Since it was 13 degrees F., when my wife discovered this she opined that only an idiot was spend that much time outdoors to take a shot. I prefer to think of it as my first step to becoming a "photographer."
BTW, I would appreciate comments on what I should have done with the sunrise shot or PP.
MMC
Loc: Brooklyn NY
Very nice set. I can give you recomendation how to improve Sunrise shot if you have photoshop, if not I can show my result if you do not mind.
UTMike wrote:
First, the disclaimer. After reading Cat's interesting post recently about light, I want to point out that right now I am from the REHess school. I take shots to share interesting things (in this case the beauty of Bryce), but I am not a "photographer." These shots are from a day and one-half trip to Bryce to show my brother-in law his new state. They were taken under available conditions. The nearest things to a "photograph" was the sunrise (#1). This is the result of getting to Sunrise Point at 5:30 am for the 6:15 sunrise. I discovered that the sun does not become visible at the point until 6:50. Since it was 13 degrees F., when my wife discovered this she opined that only an idiot was spend that much time outdoors to take a shot. I prefer to think of it as my first step to becoming a "photographer."
BTW, I would appreciate comments on what I should have done with the sunrise shot or PP.
First, the disclaimer. After reading Cat's interes... (
show quote)
MMC wrote:
Very nice set. I can give you recomendation how to improve Sunrise shot if you have photoshop, if not I can show my result if you do not mind.
I do have photoshop. Please share.
Love your backstory! The longest I've spent in one place awaiting "something" was 2 hours at an eagle nest (and it was getting
hotter )
Your compositions (and great clarity and exposure) contradict your assertion of not being a photographer. IMO one of the hardest things to convey with scenes like this is the scale. I have never been to Bryce, but from your inclusion of near objects, midpoints and distance, I feel I have a good sense of both the vastness and the rugged unique beauty.
MMC
Loc: Brooklyn NY
I was using camera raw filter and Curves adjustment. I hope these screenshots can help you.
UTMike wrote:
I do have photoshop. Please share.
MMC wrote:
I was using camera raw filter and Curves adjustment. I hope these screenshots can help you.
Eye of the beholder, take with a grain of salt or other favorite condiment: by lightening so much, you've removed the point of a sunrise shot (drama, contrast, mood, mystery).
Linda From Maine wrote:
Love your backstory! The longest I've spent in one place awaiting "something" was 2 hours at an eagle nest (and it was getting
hotter )
Your compositions (and great clarity and exposure) contradict your assertion of not being a photographer. IMO one of the hardest things to convey with scenes like this is the scale. I have never been to Bryce, but from your inclusion of near objects, midpoints and distance, I feel I have a good sense of both the vastness and the rugged unique beauty.
Love your backstory! The longest I've spent in one... (
show quote)
Coming from you Linda, I am very encouraged. Do put Bryce (and our other Utah parks) on your bucket list.
MMC wrote:
I was using camera raw filter and Curves adjustment. I hope these screenshots can help you.
Thanks for taking the time. I have not worked with the "curves" portion yet and this will prompt me to try.
UTMike wrote:
First, the disclaimer.... but I am not a "photographer." BTW, I would appreciate comments on what I should have done with the sunrise shot or PP.
These, Mike, are, in a word, reallyfreakinggood! When I saw your preceeding post yesterday --Bryce Canyon I-- I saw things I thought I might comment on, and downloaded and proceeded to re-vamp your shots in the hope of illustrating how something (composition mostly, but processing secondarily) might be 'improved.' Before long, it became obvious to me that any of the so-called improvements I made were anything but, and worse, they'd be an affront to you. So I deleted them.
Now, today, I see these you've posted. All I can think to write is: I call BS. You are indeed a photographer.
Jim
Cany143 wrote:
These, Mike, are, in a word, reallyfreakinggood! When I saw your preceeding post yesterday --Bryce Canyon I-- I saw things I though I might comment on, and downloaded and proceeded to re-vamp your shots in the hope of illustrating how something (composition mostly, but processing secondarily) might be 'improved.' Before long, it became obvious to me that any of the so-called improvements I made were anything but, and worse, they'd be an affront to you. So I deleted them.
Now, today, I see these you've posted. All I can think to write is: I call BS. You are indeed a photographer.
Jim
These, Mike, are, in a word, reallyfreakinggood! ... (
show quote)
Having seen your post today Jim, I am honored that you would say this. First Linda and now you! This is a very good day for me.
UTMike wrote:
First, the disclaimer. After reading Cat's interesting post recently about light, I want to point out that right now I am from the REHess school. I take shots to share interesting things (in this case the beauty of Bryce), but I am not a "photographer." These shots are from a day and one-half trip to Bryce to show my brother-in law his new state. They were taken under available conditions. The nearest things to a "photograph" was the sunrise (#1). This is the result of getting to Sunrise Point at 5:30 am for the 6:15 sunrise. I discovered that the sun does not become visible at the point until 6:50. Since it was 13 degrees F., when my wife discovered this she opined that only an idiot was spend that much time outdoors to take a shot. I prefer to think of it as my first step to becoming a "photographer."
BTW, I would appreciate comments on what I should have done with the sunrise shot or PP.
First, the disclaimer. After reading Cat's interes... (
show quote)
I like 2 most of your fine series.
photophile wrote:
I like 2 most of your fine series.
Thanks for taking the time to look and comment. Come see us in Utah.
Good pictures...except #1.
illininitt wrote:
Good pictures...except #1.
Give us a clue as to why you feel it isn't, please. When you make a negative comment on a photo, you have an obligation to the OP to explain yourself so that he/she can evaluate the feedback and apply it (or not) to his/her intent when taking the pic, or to future outings. If you are unwilling to do this, then we can only assume your viewpoint has
no value.
Nice images, Mike. They look like photographs to me.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.