Adobe apologizes for Lightroom Classic CC bugs, releases bug fix update
Apr 25, 2018 07:23:10 #
From Adobe: "We heard your feedback and felt that parts of the release didn’t uphold the level of quality that we hold ourselves to. We’re happy to report that these issues were resolved and now available for immediate download. Some of the issues resolved included converting presets, sorting and copying/pasting profiles, translation errors, along with crash fixes."
Full article here: https://www.dpreview.com/news/1854903020/adobe-releases-important-bug-fixes-for-lightroom-classic-cc?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2018-april-24&ref_=pe_1822230_281925440_dpr_nl_311_13
Full article here: https://www.dpreview.com/news/1854903020/adobe-releases-important-bug-fixes-for-lightroom-classic-cc?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2018-april-24&ref_=pe_1822230_281925440_dpr_nl_311_13
Apr 25, 2018 07:43:13 #
How about a refund for the month to the entire population for causing these problems? That might make it seem like they were serious in being "sorry".
Apr 25, 2018 08:00:23 #
One of the biggest reasons I do not use "subscription" based software. Too many updates released too quickly results in users finding the bugs, like beta testers, plus you get to pay them to test it.
Apr 25, 2018 08:10:19 #
All software contains bugs on release despite both Alpha and Beta testing by the manufacturer.
Hence, this fact cannot serve as a rational objection to subscription software.
Hence, this fact cannot serve as a rational objection to subscription software.
duane klipping wrote:
One of the biggest reasons I do not use "subscription" based software. Too many updates released too quickly results in users finding the bugs, like beta testers, plus you get to pay them to test it.
Apr 25, 2018 08:21:45 #
CanonTom
Loc: Birmingham
CHG_CANON wrote:
How about a refund for the month to the entire population for causing these problems? That might make it seem like they were serious in being "sorry".
Apr 25, 2018 08:22:42 #
anotherview wrote:
All software contains bugs on release despite both Alpha and Beta testing by the manufacturer.
Hence, this fact cannot serve as a rational objection to subscription software.
Hence, this fact cannot serve as a rational objection to subscription software.
Apr 25, 2018 08:27:14 #
duane klipping wrote:
One of the biggest reasons I do not use "subscription" based software. Too many updates released too quickly results in users finding the bugs, like beta testers, plus you get to pay them to test it.
Glad to hear you don't like "the subscription model." I feel so much better knowing that you feel that way.
Not sure I know of any computer program EVER that doesn't have bugs upon release.
Just knowing that people are out there wanting to bash other's decision to use the "gold standard" of PP programs, makes us all feel safe at night.
Apr 25, 2018 08:29:42 #
anotherview wrote:
All software contains bugs on release despite both Alpha and Beta testing by the manufacturer.
Hence, this fact cannot serve as a rational objection to subscription software.
Hence, this fact cannot serve as a rational objection to subscription software.
For a mature product from a mature vendor, one has to seriously question the performance of their internal controls (and people executing those controls) when they release software that breaks a number of working functions that are immediately visible to the user base but were unknown internally. Thankfully, we're not taking about software that operates mission critical systems like air traffic control or airline reservation systems, etc. Events like this, and this isn't the first by Adobe, continue to feed the fires of those against their subscription model.
Apr 25, 2018 09:41:20 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
For a mature product from a mature vendor, one has... (show quote)
The subscription model is no different from a standalone software product in its ability to have bugs upon its release. I have boxed software that "updates" are provided for to fix bugs just as I have subscription software that "updates" are provided for to fix bugs.
I too wish for greater quality control but apparently that is just a wish.
The argument that this is a good reason to stay away from Subscription software just doesn't make sense.
Apr 25, 2018 09:50:07 #
anotherview wrote:
All software contains bugs on release despite both Alpha and Beta testing by the manufacturer.
Hence, this fact cannot serve as a rational objection to subscription software.
Hence, this fact cannot serve as a rational objection to subscription software.
Rational thinking has no place in emotional conversations.
Apr 25, 2018 09:51:28 #
wds0410
Loc: Nunya
duane klipping wrote:
One of the biggest reasons I do not use "subscription" based software. Too many updates released too quickly results in users finding the bugs, like beta testers, plus you get to pay them to test it.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.