Germany absent from Syria coalition
Apr 15, 2018 21:53:03 #
The silence is deafening. I’ve not heard one word about why Germany did not participate in the Syrian chemical weapons facilities’ attack. Anybody know why Germany stayed out of it?
Apr 16, 2018 06:40:13 #
Apr 16, 2018 07:28:43 #
KGOldWolf wrote:
The silence is deafening. I’ve not heard one word about why Germany did not participate in the Syrian chemical weapons facilities’ attack. Anybody know why Germany stayed out of it?
Maybe they feel they have done enough by taking in over a million refugees. OR she doesn't want to join in activities that trump is in. She knows trump doesn't play well with others.
Apr 16, 2018 08:07:30 #
Kraken wrote:
Maybe they feel they have done enough by taking in over a million refugees. OR she doesn't want to join in activities that trump is in. She knows trump doesn't play well with others.
Or maybe they are still embarrassed by that Zyklon B gas kerfuffle from 75 years ago?
Apr 16, 2018 08:09:25 #
Steven Seward wrote:
Or maybe they are still embarrassed by that Zyklon B gas kerfuffle from 75 years ago?
I think you are reaching just a little too far.
Apr 16, 2018 08:24:04 #
Kraken wrote:
I think you are reaching just a little too far.
I was being fecetious.
Apr 16, 2018 08:33:24 #
Steven Seward wrote:
I was being fecetious.
I figured that but next time use a laughing emoji.
That would remove all doubt. 
Apr 16, 2018 09:01:30 #
Kraken wrote:
I figured that but next time use a laughing emoji. That would remove all doubt.
That would remove all doubt. I wasn't sure how to convey that, thanks.
Apr 16, 2018 11:21:27 #
Apr 16, 2018 13:07:44 #
First, The U.S., the U.K. and France, unlike Germany, are permanent members of the United Nations Security Council -- nations with the ultimate responsibility of making sure international rules are followed.
Second, Germany has an “army”of refugees in their cities already causing chaos.....what might happen if they disagreed with Germany dropping bombs on Muslims?
Third, Germany doesn’t even meet their 2% of gdp obligation to NATO, so expecting them to spend money is more of a wish than an expectation.
Second, Germany has an “army”of refugees in their cities already causing chaos.....what might happen if they disagreed with Germany dropping bombs on Muslims?
Third, Germany doesn’t even meet their 2% of gdp obligation to NATO, so expecting them to spend money is more of a wish than an expectation.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.