Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Chromatic aberration in Nikon 18-140mm - is this common?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 30, 2018 20:21:22   #
WJShaheen Loc: Gold Canyon, AZ
 
I had read so many very good comments about the subject lens that I was surprised to see the dreaded CA in my first few pics. And not in the corners, just off to the side, @ 18mm.

Is this a known problem?

Bill

Reply
Mar 30, 2018 21:29:28   #
drmike99 Loc: Fairfield Connecticut
 
WJShaheen wrote:
I had read so many very good comments about the subject lens that I was surprised to see the dreaded CA in my first few pics. And not in the corners, just off to the side, @ 18mm.

Is this a known problem?

Bill


Not in mine. Which camera are you using?

Reply
Mar 30, 2018 22:06:52   #
WJShaheen Loc: Gold Canyon, AZ
 
D7500.

Reply
 
 
Mar 30, 2018 22:09:16   #
WJShaheen Loc: Gold Canyon, AZ
 
More info. I was using 3 other lenses and never had this problem. I wanted the 18-140 for its reputed sharpness throughout the focal range.

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 01:05:55   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
https://youtu.be/fvm84W1HMfs

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 07:53:16   #
WJShaheen Loc: Gold Canyon, AZ
 
What I've since learned: As the saying goes, you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. The original photo was taken of a sunset with several saguaro in the foreground, which presented strong contrast images, to say the least. It was in my opinion asking too much of the lens. Image (1) is the original (opened in View-NXi) and exported to tif.
Image (2) is after strong post processing, raising the black levels. (3) is with a CA adjustment applied in PP.
(1) http://www.pbase.com/wjshaheen/image/167238382/large
(2) http://www.pbase.com/wjshaheen/image/167238383/large
(3) http://www.pbase.com/wjshaheen/image/167238384/large

A perfect candidate for employing HDR imaging.

Thanks,
Bill

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 10:12:36   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
You should check with Nikon. Chromatic aberrations are common with digital gear but I have not heard much about chromatic aberrations with the lens you are using now.

Reply
 
 
Mar 31, 2018 10:27:18   #
WJShaheen Loc: Gold Canyon, AZ
 
camerapapi wrote:
You should check with Nikon. Chromatic aberrations are common with digital gear but I have not heard much about chromatic aberrations with the lens you are using now.


I thought I'd live with the lens for a couple weeks under more normal (and experienced) shooting situations and decide where to go.
And, your suggestion is certainly an option.

Thank you,
Bill

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 20:21:45   #
JaiGieEse Loc: Foxworth, MS
 
WJShaheen wrote:
I thought I'd live with the lens for a couple weeks under more normal (and experienced) shooting situations and decide where to go.
And, your suggestion is certainly an option.

Thank you,
Bill


Just a thought. Some year ago, my wife gave me a D7000 - 18-200 mm lens. Buncha shots exhibited some CA. Like you, I was surprised.

A while later, I was looking at my camera's menu settings. When I opened the AF Fine Tune Menu, I discovered that the camera had a +5 adjustment. I had NOT done this. Possibly, someone at the factory had been testing the camera and forgot to re-do the setting.

I set the AF Fine Tune adjustment back to zero. Took a few shots and saw two things. The focus was MUCH better and the CA was gone.

Give it a look-see.

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 20:34:56   #
WJShaheen Loc: Gold Canyon, AZ
 
JaiGieEse wrote:
Just a thought. Some year ago, my wife gave me a D7000 - 18-200 mm lens. Buncha shots exhibited some CA. Like you, I was surprised.

A while later, I was looking at my camera's menu settings. When I opened the AF Fine Tune Menu, I discovered that the camera had a +5 adjustment. I had NOT done this. Possibly, someone at the factory had been testing the camera and forgot to re-do the setting.

I set the AF Fine Tune adjustment back to zero. Took a few shots and saw two things. The focus was MUCH better and the CA was gone.

Give it a look-see.
Just a thought. Some year ago, my wife gave me a D... (show quote)


Oh, I gotta try that. I've been meaning to get into checking the fine tuning and just hadn't gotten around to it. Thank you.

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 20:40:46   #
WJShaheen Loc: Gold Canyon, AZ
 
WJShaheen wrote:
Oh, I gotta try that. I've been meaning to get into checking the fine tuning and just hadn't gotten around to it. Thank you.


Just checked and my AF-tune is at zero. Thanks.

Reply
 
 
Mar 31, 2018 20:47:46   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
https://www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/nikon/18-140mm-f3.5-5.6g-ed-af-s-dx-vr-nikkor/review/
They report that CA is higher than usual when compared to other offerings from Nikon.

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 21:02:23   #
brucewells Loc: Central Kentucky
 
WJShaheen wrote:
What I've since learned: As the saying goes, you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. The original photo was taken of a sunset with several saguaro in the foreground, which presented strong contrast images, to say the least. It was in my opinion asking too much of the lens. Image (1) is the original (opened in View-NXi) and exported to tif.
Image (2) is after strong post processing, raising the black levels. (3) is with a CA adjustment applied in PP.
(1) http://www.pbase.com/wjshaheen/image/167238382/large
(2) http://www.pbase.com/wjshaheen/image/167238383/large
(3) http://www.pbase.com/wjshaheen/image/167238384/large

A perfect candidate for employing HDR imaging.

Thanks,
Bill
What I've since learned: As the saying goes, you c... (show quote)


CA rears it’s ugly head about the time we think we have some pretty good shots, as you do here. It’s aggravating, and not uncommon, regardless the lens you’re using. I should do some reading to see how to avoid it while shooting, but it doesn’t happen that often and Lightroom typically eliminates it. I think the second image displays some rather mild CA. I’ve seen much worse, in my own work. It seems you remedied the situation. I wouldn’t worry about that lens so much. I’d bet it has given you some images you’re proud of.

Incidentally, I like that foreground in silhouette against that sunset!

Good luck!

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 21:34:07   #
WJShaheen Loc: Gold Canyon, AZ
 
brucewells wrote:
CA rears it’s ugly head about the time we think we have some pretty good shots, as you do here. It’s aggravating, and not uncommon, regardless the lens you’re using. I should do some reading to see how to avoid it while shooting, but it doesn’t happen that often and Lightroom typically eliminates it. I think the second image displays some rather mild CA. I’ve seen much worse, in my own work. It seems you remedied the situation. I wouldn’t worry about that lens so much. I’d bet it has given you some images you’re proud of.

Incidentally, I like that foreground in silhouette against that sunset!

Good luck!
CA rears it’s ugly head about the time we think we... (show quote)


Thank you, Bruce. Yes, I've since played around with it under more normal conditions. By the way, with a Kenko 1.4x TC the images are excellent.

Appreciate your comments.

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 21:36:00   #
WJShaheen Loc: Gold Canyon, AZ
 
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
https://www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/nikon/18-140mm-f3.5-5.6g-ed-af-s-dx-vr-nikkor/review/
They report that CA is higher than usual when compared to other offerings from Nikon.


Yes, DxO had a similar sounding report. They felt that the sharpness throughout the range was worth the slight CA in the corners at 18mm.

Thanks.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.