iamimdoc wrote:
I use a Nikon D200. > 10 years old. Works fine
I am a competent amateur. Shoot for fun. Display photos on an 8 X 10 digital picture frame in my office for folks to look at (MD office)
Any prints I make anymore (rare) are 8X10 or less
No sports
No video
Do some pics of grandchild but mainly I do photo on travels (go to the UK for family), flowers, landscape, architecture, some macro work
Does spending up to $2000.00 (or less) for a new camera get me anything for what I do?
My sense is that this is money not well.
Thanks
I use a Nikon D200. > 10 years old. Works fine ... (
show quote)
It may help if you explain your thought process a little. Nobody knows why you are thinking of upgrading, or what you are lacking or feel you are missing. Hence the responses are all over the place.