Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Auto ISO sensitivity advice
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
Mar 9, 2018 06:18:34   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
TriX wrote:
If the search function were better...


Yes, Search is often disappointing, but the titles can be disappointing, too. "Something Different," "Help," "Advice, Please." If the title doesn't state the topic, the Search feature isn't going to find it.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 06:34:44   #
par4fore Loc: Bay Shore N.Y.
 
willy6419 wrote:
I'm an amateur hobbyist that shoots some macro, mostly landscapes and wildlife, working on BIF skills in preparation for 5+ weeks in Alaska. Nikon D 500 and D 750 bodies with a variety of lenses. Normally RAW and Lightroom post processing. Tripod or monopod when i can.

I'm experimenting with Auto ISO for wildlife to maintain desired shutter speed image quality, in varying light conditions. My goal is tact sharp image.

Any advice to speed my learning curve or redirect my thinking is appreciated.
I'm an amateur hobbyist that shoots some macro, mo... (show quote)



Using auto ISO DOES give you the lowest ISO possible; based on the required and desired shutter speed and aperture.......!

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 07:03:48   #
picsman Loc: Scotland
 
I use a D750 for action shots and set the auto ISO maximum to 3200 and minimum shutter speed based on lens chosen. If noise is ok I use capture one but if noise is more obvious I use DxO to process RAW images.

Reply
 
 
Mar 9, 2018 07:09:15   #
rscott1015
 
Great information, great question, thanks!

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 07:27:04   #
johntaylor333
 
Isn't that the function of Auto ISA - to use the lowest ISO for correct exposure given your aperture, shutter speed and compensation.
That's how it works on all my Canons

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 07:29:51   #
Jim Bob
 
par4fore wrote:
Using auto ISO DOES give you the lowest ISO possible; based on the required and desired shutter speed and aperture.......!


Nope. This is not a certainty.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 07:39:06   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
I can only speak on my behalf and I NEVER use Auto WB. I prefer to use a setting to approximate the lighting present on my subject and an example is Sunlight setting when the sun is shining.
For birds in flight I use a shutter speed that allows me to freeze action and that shutter speed has to be higher than the focal length of the lens I am using. If am using my 80-400 VR lens I know I need 1/500sec minimum shutter speed although 1/1000sec would be much better. At times I slow the shutter speed only for panning.

Reply
 
 
Mar 9, 2018 07:43:20   #
Tomcat5133 Loc: Gladwyne PA
 
You can select a range limit of ISO on my cameras. So you don't go to high but can get the shot.
The new digital camera's are amazing with their ISO options. Test you camera and find out what happens
with different settings as far as noise. A lot for camera claims are not always what they claim.
I am watching and older series The Killing (started in 2011) on Netflix.
I was taken back about how much noise some of the low light footage has. It would never pass the test today.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 07:43:46   #
Jim Bob
 
camerapapi wrote:
I can only speak on my behalf and I NEVER use Auto WB. I prefer to use a setting to approximate the lighting present on my subject and an example is Sunlight setting when the sun is shining.
For birds in flight I use a shutter speed that allows me to freeze action and that shutter speed has to be higher than the focal length of the lens I am using. If am using my 80-400 VR lens I know I need 1/500sec minimum shutter speed although 1/1000sec would be much better. At times I slow the shutter speed only for panning.
I can only speak on my behalf and I NEVER use Auto... (show quote)


Excuse me, this is thread about auto ISO, not auto white balance.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 08:01:31   #
mikeroetex Loc: Lafayette, LA
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:

I use Manual + AutoISO 90% of the time for everything. I stumbled on the technique quite by accident. Reading John Gerlach and Steve Perry's posts helped me understand what I had discovered. Before I started using AutoISO, I would press the shutter and get that dull, no-click feeling of pressing a dead button because the camera did not shoot. I first noticed this phenomena shooting sports on poorly lit football fields. When the action moved to sidelines or end zones, the camera would not engage. AutoISO fixed that. Do I sometimes have a noisy image, yes... but if I miss a TD or great catch, it's on me and not the camera.

My question to those who don't advocate AutoISO is this: Given there are only 3 legs to the Exposure Triangle and you have locked in aperture and shutter speed, do you simply accept not getting the shot or having the camera not fire when light conditions change at a precise moment that would dictate a higher ISO? Or do you go with Aperture priority and accept blurry photos because SS dropped dramatically? How do you overcome? It would seem to me that quickly changing the ISO yourself is simply losing reaction time the camera is built to do for you.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 08:10:51   #
jwn Loc: SOUTHEAST GEORGIA USA
 
you are right on....but also you can set the limits (min/max) ISO in camera to keep it in acceptable range

Reply
 
 
Mar 9, 2018 08:38:25   #
RRS Loc: Not sure
 
MT Shooter wrote:
I have been shooting wildlife professionally since the early 1970's and Auto ISO would be one of the LAST settings I would choose. I always select my ISO & WB based on the scene and light I am shooting in.


I too have been shooting a long time too but back in 1970 was there such a thing as auto ISO. Do you know when that was first available on our digital cameras?

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 08:47:13   #
pithydoug Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
 
anotherview wrote:
Being a Canon shooter, I cannot offer an assessment of your Nikon camera and its ISO performance.

In general, though, putting a digital camera on Auto ISO allows the shooter to control Shutter Speed and Aperture manually, to suit intention, while the camera automatically picks the required ISO for a good exposure.

At some point, however, Auto ISO may select an ISO setting that produces too much noise in the captured image. The judgment of the shooter must determine the level of noise acceptable to the purpose of the image.

Know that the advent and development of image stabilization has given the shooter more latitude in the selection of exposure settings. In other words, with IS, the shooter could set the ISO to 100 or lower while manually controlling Shutter Speed and Aperture.

Getting a good exposure with IS engaged still requires the shooter to use effective hand-held technique.

Abandoning the tripod in favor of hand-holding with IS engaged may give you the results you seek. But this suggestion prompts old-school advocates of using a tripod to air strong opinions about this accessory. Read more here on the tripod: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/digital-killed-my-tripod.htm

Good luck.
Being a Canon shooter, I cannot offer an assessmen... (show quote)


I agree! My Canon 5dIII is super on manual with auto ISO, especially with BIF. If I tried toget all three settings for each shot I would spend more time playing with dials and missing what I was there for. As anotherview says, it all about your camera and sensor etc. I wold also suggest if you want tact sharp. to practice spot focus, AI-servo and continuous fire. Shoot burst of 3-5 and you will increase your odds of nailing the bird.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 08:49:32   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Yes, Search is often disappointing, but the titles can be disappointing, too. "Something Different," "Help," "Advice, Please." If the title doesn't state the topic, the Search feature isn't going to find it.


I recommenced using google to search this site. The format is:

<search term> site:uglyhedgehog.com

This will restrict the search of the term to this site and will include the content of posts as well as the titles.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 09:02:02   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Auto ISO is equivalent to the plague. Run away!!! Run away!!!
--Bob
willy6419 wrote:
I'm an amateur hobbyist that shoots some macro, mostly landscapes and wildlife, working on BIF skills in preparation for 5+ weeks in Alaska. Nikon D 500 and D 750 bodies with a variety of lenses. Normally RAW and Lightroom post processing. Tripod or monopod when i can.

I'm experimenting with Auto ISO for wildlife to maintain desired shutter speed image quality, in varying light conditions. My goal is tact sharp image.

Any advice to speed my learning curve or redirect my thinking is appreciated.
I'm an amateur hobbyist that shoots some macro, mo... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.