Question on wide angle lens...
Mar 6, 2018 08:25:02 #
Ji Li wrote:
Thank you (everyone) for the comments and feedback... (show quote)
Here is another thought. If you are getting paid by realtors for your work, then this should be viewed as a business expense. That may soften the impact of the cost of the Nikon, which seems to be what you really want. For me, purely a hobbyist, I would settle for something less expensive. Don’t rule out refurbished and used, and maybe you have not.
Mar 6, 2018 08:36:26 #
Ji Li wrote:
Thanks for the note of the Sigma 14-24. It looks impressive, but of course, we will only know for sure after it is released and used for a bit.
Meanwhile, the Tamrom does have 15x focal length, and vibration control, but is noticed for loss of clarity when wide open, especially away from the center of focus. Nikkor is quite a bit more expensive.
Meanwhile, the Tamrom does have 15x focal length, and vibration control, but is noticed for loss of clarity when wide open, especially away from the center of focus. Nikkor is quite a bit more expensive.
The Tamron is actually sharper than the Nikon from a couple of tests I have seen. The difference in any case is small.
Mar 6, 2018 08:45:05 #
Nikon does not manufacture a 12-24 f2.8. I am sure you were referring to the 14-24 f2.8 lens which is well regarded as a very fine lens. The Tamron 15-30 f2.8 has also good marks but if money is not an issue my choice would be Nikon.
Mar 6, 2018 09:11:36 #
Booker wrote:
I don't think you're whining at all; simply gathering info prior to making a major cost decision. I use both Nikon & Tamron lenses of various focal lengths, but if I were doing commercial work, I'd stick with Nikon. Remember, you will have the lens a long time.
"So, I'm still torn. The price difference is quite significant. What to do? One thing the Nikon has above the Tamron is the resale value, but I don't ever plan to sell it."
You call that "...simply gathering info...". Geesus. Amazing what some of you posters will think and say...or at least say. Thought might not be a part of the equation.
Mar 6, 2018 10:20:46 #
Thanks for the correction, yes, you are right. The 12-24 is an DX (crop) and F4 which I am not interested.
Since my primary objective is for clarity and crispness, I think the Tamron will work best.
I am surprised, however, how much difference of view there is between a 14mm vs 15mm as in this comparison between the two.
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4651324149/tamron-15-30-f2-8-vs-nikon-14-24-f2-8-shootout
Since my primary objective is for clarity and crispness, I think the Tamron will work best.
I am surprised, however, how much difference of view there is between a 14mm vs 15mm as in this comparison between the two.
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4651324149/tamron-15-30-f2-8-vs-nikon-14-24-f2-8-shootout
Mar 6, 2018 10:52:50 #
Isn't that nikkor 12-24 a DX lens?
Ji Li wrote:
I have a Nikon D750 (full frame) and want a good wide angle zoom lens.
My main goal is clarity and crispness.
I'm trying to decide between the Nikkor 12-24mm, F2.8 and then Tamron 15-30mm, F2.8.
Both lens have excellent 5-star reviews, and the Nikkor is about $500 more expensive (as expected).
But what I want to know is from people who have one or the other (or both) and can give some personal feedback.
Thanks in advance.
My main goal is clarity and crispness.
I'm trying to decide between the Nikkor 12-24mm, F2.8 and then Tamron 15-30mm, F2.8.
Both lens have excellent 5-star reviews, and the Nikkor is about $500 more expensive (as expected).
But what I want to know is from people who have one or the other (or both) and can give some personal feedback.
Thanks in advance.
Mar 6, 2018 11:00:51 #
I have the Nikkor 14-24. It is a wonderful lens, nice and clear and super sharp. Happy shooting.
Mar 6, 2018 11:10:58 #
Mar 6, 2018 11:26:24 #
ronichas wrote:
I have the Nikon D750 also. One of the B&H guys suggested the Rokinon 14 mm, f2.8 lens. I bought it and have used it for the milky way and aurora. I have a 24-70 but wanted something a bit wider that was too expensive or heavy. This one was perfect!
I would certainly not recommend the Rokinon 14mm if using it for real estate. I got one for this purpose but the distortion was terrible and not fully correctable. I then purchased a 16-35mm zoom (Canon) which has much less distortion which is mostly correctable in Photoshop. The Nikon equivalent would be a better choice for real estate IMO.
Mar 6, 2018 11:30:05 #
If I were you I would go for either the Tamron 15 to 30 lens or the very sharp 16 to 35/4 lens. I have shot with the Nikon 16 t0 35/F4 lens and was very satisfied.
Mar 6, 2018 11:57:57 #
Ji Li wrote:
Yes I know the 14-24 is FX and have it. The OP referenced a 12-24. Maybe a typo?
Mar 6, 2018 12:19:06 #
Rashid Abdu
Loc: Ohio
I have the Nikon 14-24 mm f2.8. Excellent lens. I love it! As for the price, a wise pro told me once that you should buy the best you can afford.
If you can afford it, get the 14-24.
Good luck.
Rashid
If you can afford it, get the 14-24.
Good luck.
Rashid
Mar 6, 2018 12:28:12 #
Thanks. I'm convinced now that for the money, and for my primary objective of sharpness and clarity, I am going to purchase the Tamron 15-30 F2.8.
Mar 6, 2018 12:30:53 #
12-24 best or 16-35 both very sharp 3rd party lens not as sharp don't take my word for it rent one and you will see.
Mar 6, 2018 12:33:46 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.