where can I get very strange looking film negatives developed (Page 2): I’m sticking to my opinion: it’s too long for 110. .67” for 110. This is measured closer to 1”.

LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field

Peterff wrote:

110 is a cartridge film format introduced by Kodak in 1972. The 110 frame size is 13 x 17 mm (0.51 x 0.67 in). There is one registration hole per frame.

How does that match with the images and measurements provided? So far as we can see, it doesn't.

I’m sticking to my opinion: it’s too long for 110. .67” for 110. This is measured closer to 1”.

twowindsbear

Peterff wrote:

110 is a cartridge film format introduced by Kodak in 1972. The 110 frame size is 13 x 17 mm (0.51 x 0.67 in). There is one registration hole per frame.

How does that match with the images and measurements provided? So far as we can see, it doesn't.

OK - here's a copy & paste from the Wiki article in The Watcher's post, giving dimensions of APS-C film:

The film is 24 mm wide, and has three image formats:

H for "High Definition" (30.2 × 16.7 mm; aspect ratio 16:9; 4×7" print)
C for "Classic" (25.1 × 16.7 mm; aspect ratio 3:2; 4×6" print)
P for "Panoramic" (30.2 × 9.5 mm; aspect ratio 3:1; 4×11" print)

Argue with Wiki - not me.

twowindsbear

LoneRangeFinder wrote:

I’m sticking to my opinion: it’s too long for 110. .67” for 110. This is measured closer to 1”.

You're looking at the outside dimensions of the pre-flashed frame on the film, not the inside measurements of the actual image.

LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field

twowindsbear wrote:

You're looking at the outside dimensions of the pre-flashed frame on the film, not the inside measurements of the actual image.

I don’t believe so. Read this: http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/110_film

It says quite clearly the the frame size is .51” x .67”.

At this point, agree to disagree.

Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.

LoneRangeFinder wrote:

I’m sticking to my opinion: it’s too long for 110. .67” for 110. This is measured closer to 1”.

The visual evidence is on your side, Sir. APS-C is the likely candidate.

Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.

twowindsbear wrote:

OK - here's a copy & paste from the Wiki article in The Watcher's post, giving dimensions of APS-C film:

The film is 24 mm wide, and has three image formats:

H for "High Definition" (30.2 × 16.7 mm; aspect ratio 16:9; 4×7" print)
C for "Classic" (25.1 × 16.7 mm; aspect ratio 3:2; 4×6" print)
P for "Panoramic" (30.2 × 9.5 mm; aspect ratio 3:1; 4×11" print)

Argue with Wiki - not me.

I'm not arguing with a web site.The visual provided closely matches APS-C format: 25.1 × 16.7 mm. Could it be 110? Possibly, but at 13 mm × 17 mm (0.51 in × 0.67 in) it doesn't look like it.

However, it doesn't matter. It would be simple to scan the negatives and produce digital positives, even it it did involve cutting a custom mask.

ejones0310 Loc: Tulsa, OK

It is 110 film. Each frame has a large mask in between frames that is making each frame about .67". I think everyone is liking at the long leader with the round hole in it and mistaking it for a legitimate frame, which it is not. Look at the fames hidden under the cellphone. They are much shorter. APS film was also returned as one long strip in the film canister, while 110 film was retuned in strips of about 6 frames.

twowindsbear

ejones0310 wrote:

It is 110 film. Each frame has a large mask in between frames that is making each frame about .67". I think everyone is liking at the long leader with the round hole in it and mistaking it for a legitimate frame, which it is not. Look at the fames hidden under the cellphone. They are much shorter. APS film was also returned as one long strip in the film canister, while 110 film was retuned in strips of about 6 frames.

burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC

rehess wrote:

I didn't realize MFT sensors are so tiny.

Cell phone camera sensors are small. M4/3 sensors are HUGE by comparison.

LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field

ejones0310 wrote:

It is 110 film. Each frame has a large mask in between frames that is making each frame about .67". I think everyone is liking at the long leader with the round hole in it and mistaking it for a legitimate frame, which it is not. Look at the fames hidden under the cellphone. They are much shorter. APS film was also returned as one long strip in the film canister, while 110 film was retuned in strips of about 6 frames.

I see your point.

The Watcher

Did some more research and come across this. When you compare the registration holes, it looks like the film is in fact 110.

billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont

quick235 wrote:

Attached is a photo of film negatives that my older sister found in a box. I have never seen anything like these- 0.5" wide, 1.0" long each negative. Anyone know where I could get film negatives developed? especially these?

(She has no idea what camera was used to take the photos.)

They probably came from a Minox miniature camera or a like one. And, most places that process negs. should be able to help you. Most processors probably do not have neg. holders anymore that fit this size neg. but a 35 mm holder should do the job.
The negs. could have been taken by the following camera.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Minox-B-subminiature-camera-outfit-Projector-Film-Tripod-Mount-More-Too/132514303193?epid=103001779&hash=item1eda77ccd9:g:IPUAAOSwJRZaXSRE

jacklewis014

110 film most likely from the 70's

Nanook Bill

quick235 wrote:

Attached is a photo of film negatives that my older sister found in a box. I have never seen anything like these- 0.5" wide, 1.0" long each negative. Anyone know where I could get film negatives developed? especially these?

(She has no idea what camera was used to take the photos.)

I would get a photo scanner and scan them. I do that to all the negatives I have to have printed. You might have to color correct them or touch them up in photoshop or lightroom.

drmike99 Loc: Fairfield Connecticut

[quote=The Watcher]The film is too large for 110, I think it could be APS film (Kodak Advanced Photo System) that was introduced in 1996.

Here’s a link to Kodak’s ID numbers, look up the number on the side of the film and let us know what you have.

http://www.taphilo.com/Photo/kodakfilmnumxref.shtml

APS is 24mm wide. Those shown are 110 negatives. And there actually were a couple of good 110s. Pentax made a 110 SLR with interchangeable lenses. There was another quality 110 that looked like the more typical 110s but I can’t remember who made it.