just be careful. I changed my ratio once by mistake and all of my images were cropped. Know what you are doing before changing it. Now I stay with 3:2
DirtFarmer
Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
I use the aspect ratio that fits the composition I want. That is independent of the aspect ratio of my camera bodies. I do a lot of cropping in post.
With my dSLR cameras I use the 3:2 native format but with my Olympus bodies I go 4:3 which allows me to use the whole sensor better known as full frame. Please note that using a cropped 3:2 sensor is also full frame when using a lens designed to be used with that particular camera.
In post I also tend to keep the aspect ratios I used with the camera but at times that needs modification.
HarryM wrote:
What aspect ratio do you use, and why.
I use the aspect ratio of the camera 16:9. My assumption is that this is the best use of the sensor, and after PP each image ends up at whatever aspect ratio is best for that particular composition. Sometimes I will even try out different ways to present that image. So adopting some other aspect ratio does not make a lot of sense to me!
Tom Daniels wrote:
I found myself doing a lot of video a few years ago and shooting stills too. Also pull stills off of hybrid HD video and photoshopped them.
So I only use 16x9. Everything I do is around this size. I like other aspect ratio's but am I now stuck on 16x9. It is a film like crop.
And with the takeover of 16x9 smart TV's people are now used to that size.
Depending on the camera: always the image ratio that gives me the most "real estate".
I can always crop.
xt2
Loc: British Columbia, Canada
Ramm Francis wrote:
The difficulty with this thread is that you are talking video to a crowd of still-image photographers. Yes, 16x9 wide-screen shooting for video is wonderful but that aspect doesn't exist unless the camera does both still images and video. Myself? I like the 4X3 aspect of the Fuji GFX because it can be shot anamorphic natively as well as with aspheric lenses. Only problem? Fuji stopped at the video railroad crossing with HD video and didn't cross over to the other side of the tracks where everyone is on 4K and going to 8K. Pity.
The difficulty with this thread is that you are ta... (
show quote)
Not so much! Check out the Fujifilm X-H1...
DirtFarmer wrote:
I use the aspect ratio that fits the composition I want. That is independent of the aspect ratio of my camera bodies. I do a lot of cropping in post.
Best answer yet! The world does not fit any particular aspect ratio.
I would imagine one would have in mind the aspect ratio of the final viewed image. To make a 3x2 image into a 5x7 print requires a certain amount of PP work or a printer that does it for you. There are so many viewing formats, so I imagine camera makers tend to cater to the most common viewing formats.
DirtFarmer wrote:
I use the aspect ratio that fits the composition I want. That is independent of the aspect ratio of my camera bodies. I do a lot of cropping in post.
...yup, me 2. I tend to throw alot of pixels away (sniff)... ;0)
HarryM wrote:
What aspect ratio do you use, and why.
Whatever works for the need.
1:1 (square) for Instagram and similar uses.
3:2 or 2:3 for images that have to match traditional 35mm format
4:3 or 3:4 for newsletters, training guides where I'm not recording video
16:9 for stills used in video presentations (HDTV or 4K)
7:5 or 5:7 for 2.5x3.5, 3.5x5, and 5x7 frames
5:4 or 4:5 for 4x5, 8x10, 16x20 frames
3:1 for panoramas
...and so forth.
My raw files are always color, full 4:3 (Micro 4/3) aspect ratio, cropped in post-production. JPEGs might be B&W and/or cropped in camera to 1:1, 4:3, 3:2, or 16:9.
And Big Guy, that is the correct answer, IMHO.
4:3 because it is the native ratio for my camera and, therefore, the one that captures the most data. If I want to produce a picture having a different ratio, I will crop accordingly. All in camera ratios other than native produce raw images that are cropped by the camera. I prefer to choose the crop in post. That way, I can shoulder all the blame for the finished product.
I edited some scanned family slides and without intending to I found myself gravitating towards 5:4 and 4:5.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.