Photo Gallery
which is better?
Page
<<first
<prev
4 of 4
Feb 26, 2018 05:27:25
#
fosgood11
Loc: oil city, La.
ebbote wrote:
#2 Donald.
THANKS EARNEST
Reply
Feb 26, 2018 05:29:03
#
fosgood11
Loc: oil city, La.
bigwolf40 wrote:
#2 for me but I think a cropping and straightening out would this photo good....Rich
THANKS RICH
Reply
Feb 26, 2018 05:30:35
#
fosgood11
Loc: oil city, La.
BlueMorel wrote:
Ditto on sharpness for #2 but cropping a bit tight on top. Prefer the color and comp of #1.
THANKS
Reply
Feb 26, 2018 05:32:18
#
fosgood11
Loc: oil city, La.
rmalarz wrote:
Donald, the second one is much better focus, but needs to be leveled or straightened.
--Bob
THANKS BOB
Reply
Feb 26, 2018 05:36:52
#
fosgood11
Loc: oil city, La.
vicksart wrote:
I'm with the group that voted for #2. Would like to see a little more space above his head and a leveled bird feeder, but the image is nice and sharp.
THANKS VICKI
Reply
Feb 26, 2018 05:38:10
#
fosgood11
Loc: oil city, La.
mleuck wrote:
Better than what?
1 VS 2
Reply
Feb 26, 2018 05:39:16
#
fosgood11
Loc: oil city, La.
torchman310 wrote:
It's NIKON hands down.
THANKS
Reply
Feb 26, 2018 05:40:21
#
fosgood11
Loc: oil city, La.
hassighedgehog wrote:
What are you comparing? If camera's, #1 has motion blur, so not really fair to the camera. You would need to compare same non-moving subject.
THANKS
Reply
Feb 26, 2018 05:41:19
#
fosgood11
Loc: oil city, La.
PAR4DCR wrote:
#2 for me.
Don
THANKS DON
Reply
Feb 26, 2018 05:42:25
#
fosgood11
Loc: oil city, La.
jpgto wrote:
THANKS JEFF
Reply
Feb 26, 2018 05:43:12
#
fosgood11
Loc: oil city, La.
Ramm Francis wrote:
The comp on the first pix shows direction and feels alive.
THANKS
Reply
Page
<<first
<prev
4 of 4
If you want to reply, then
register here
. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery