Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Monopods: with or without a head
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Feb 18, 2018 18:54:12   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
I'm curious about using a monopod without a head. I've always used a tilt head for side-to-side adjustments, but I know some prefer to attach the monopod directly to the camera. What do you see as the advantages of your method of choice, and if you attach directly, how do you handle situations when tilting it forward or backward will not give you the angle you want?

Thanks!

Reply
Feb 18, 2018 19:01:42   #
pesfls Loc: Oregon, USA
 
I have done it both ways. They both work. No tilt head may be a bit awkward sometimes but I would not say you can not. You just have to lean the pod where you need it while pushing it down for traction. I use the wrist strap for that to help secure it to the ground. Others may disagree, of course, but I've found it manageable.

Reply
Feb 18, 2018 19:03:59   #
rwilson1942 Loc: Houston, TX
 
For me a tilt head (up down only) is needed to fully utilize a monopod.
By the way, a true tilt head only goes up and down, side-to-side would be a pan head.
Have a look at the Manfrotto 234 Monopod Tilt Head to see what I mean.
Side to side movement is achieved by simply rotating the monopod.
Without the tilt head the amount of up-down movement is very limited.

Reply
 
 
Feb 18, 2018 19:06:01   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
rwilson1942 wrote:
For me a tilt head (up down only) is needed to fully utilize a monopod.
By the way, a true tilt head only goes up and down, side-to-side would be a pan head.
Have a look at the Manfrotto 234 Monopod Tilt Head to see what I mean.
Side to side movement is achieved by simply rotating the monopod.
Without the tilt head the amount of up-down movement is very limited.


That's exactly what I do. If fact, that may well be the head I have on my monopod. Thanks.

Reply
Feb 18, 2018 19:06:17   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
pesfls wrote:
I have done it both ways. They both work. No tilt head may be a bit awkward sometimes but I would not say you can not. You just have to lean the pod where you need it while pushing it down for traction. I use the wrist strap for that to help secure it to the ground. Others may disagree, of course, but I've found it manageable.


Thank you.

Reply
Feb 18, 2018 19:11:08   #
pesfls Loc: Oregon, USA
 
Rab-Eye wrote:
Thank you.


The other gentleman makes valid points. I should have said manageable but with real limitations. Why not put your body on it without the tilt head and fiddle around and see what you think. Worth a stab.

Reply
Feb 18, 2018 19:17:33   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
pesfls wrote:
The other gentleman makes valid points. I should have said manageable but with real limitations. Why not put your body on it without the tilt head and fiddle around and see what you think. Worth a stab.


Can’t hurt. Thanks.

Reply
 
 
Feb 18, 2018 20:00:39   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
From someone who never used a monopod, how big/heavy a lens is practical?

---

Reply
Feb 18, 2018 20:44:17   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
Bill_de wrote:
From someone who never used a monopod, how big/heavy a lens is practical?

---


I recently shot all morning with a Nikon D850 and Tamron 70-200, which got heavier as the day wore on. A Monopod supports the weight nicely..

Reply
Feb 18, 2018 20:49:20   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
Bill_de wrote:
From someone who never used a monopod, how big/heavy a lens is practical?

---

The limit is probably whatever you can handle, but the heavier the lens/camera, the more important balance becomes.

Reply
Feb 18, 2018 20:52:59   #
toxdoc42
 
I use my trek/monopod if I don't need to tilt. I have a fully operational head if I need the equivalent of a tripod.

Reply
 
 
Feb 18, 2018 20:55:33   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
toxdoc42 wrote:
I use my trek/monopod if I don't need to tilt. I have a fully operational head if I need the equivalent of a tripod.


Serious question: how do you know in advance if you'll need to tilt? In some situations I’m sure you’ll know, but not always, I would think.

Reply
Feb 18, 2018 21:08:55   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
rwilson1942 wrote:
For me a tilt head (up down only) is needed to fully utilize a monopod.
By the way, a true tilt head only goes up and down, side-to-side would be a pan head.
Have a look at the Manfrotto 234 Monopod Tilt Head to see what I mean.
Side to side movement is achieved by simply rotating the monopod.
Without the tilt head the amount of up-down movement is very limited.


I agree and use mine with the 70-200, 200-500 and 150-600. The 234 was borderline for use with the heavier lenses, so I switched to an RRS MH-01 LR and have been very satisfied.

Reply
Feb 18, 2018 22:03:29   #
rwilson1942 Loc: Houston, TX
 
Rab-Eye wrote:
That's exactly what I do. If fact, that may well be the head I have on my monopod. Thanks.


Good.
I was confused because you said you used the tilt head for side-to-side adjustments in your original post.

Reply
Feb 18, 2018 22:21:31   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
rwilson1942 wrote:
Good.
I was confused because you said you used the tilt head for side-to-side adjustments in your original post.


I supposed I used the wrong terminology. Just a question of how I orient the camera to the head that moves only on two axes.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.