This just in: Republicans won election with Russia support: Russians spent millions per month targeting voters in swing states to throw the election. Republicans can’t win now without...

jcboy3

Russians spent millions per month targeting voters in swing states to throw the election.

Republicans can’t win now without Russian support. It’s clear, Russians wanted anyone but Clinton.

Republicans deny Russian involvement in the election while obstructing the investigation. That, in and of itself, constitutes collusion.

As Trump said. Treason. Yes, that sounds right.

tradio Loc: Oxford, Ohio

Thanks for filling us in. You need to call Mueller and let him know so we can stop spending all this money on the investigation.

jcboy3

tradio wrote:

Thanks for filling us in. You need to call Mueller and let him know so we can stop spending all this money on the investigation.

Nope. Got to get details, names, and indictments.

EyeSawYou

jcboy3 wrote:

Russians spent millions per month targeting voters in swing states to throw the election.

Republicans can’t win now without Russian support. It’s clear, Russians wanted anyone but Clinton.

Republicans deny Russian involvement in the election while obstructing the investigation. That, in and of itself, constitutes collusion.

As Trump said. Treason. Yes, that sounds right.

Lol pure nonsense..

However, Rosenstein underscored that there is "no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity" and "no allegation that this activity actually altered the outcome of the 2016 election." Trump won the election regardless of Russian influence or not.

jcboy3

EyeSawYou wrote:

Lol pure nonsense..

However, Rosenstein underscored that there is "no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity" and "no allegation that this activity actually altered the outcome of the 2016 election." Trump won the election regardless of Russian influence or not.

No allegation in one indictment does not mean anything. The claim that this constitutes vindication are not justified. And given that Republicans still refuse to acknowledge Russian meddling in the election in the face of this evidence constitutes implicit support for it.

Mueller is still working his way up the chain indicates further indictments will follow.

In the meantime, refusal to acknowledge Russian involvement and to take action prior to the 2018 elections is simply dereliction of duty.

The only solution is to flip the house and have a full investigation. And then burn the witches.

EyeSawYou

jcboy3 wrote:

No allegation in one indictment does not mean anyt... (show quote)

Here you are perpetuating the same lie that the Republicans and conservatives are STILL denying Russia was was attempting to influence 2016 election. It is a fact that Donald Trump and Republicans did believe it was false or a hoax but they no longer feel that way and have voiced their opinion on this issue. The fact of the matter is that there is no evidence so far that the Russian meddling has changed any votes or or that there meddling actually altered the outcome the 2016 election.

Trump says he agrees with US intelligence community that Russia meddled in election
By JORDYN PHELPS Nov 12, 2017, 12:30 AM ET

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-agrees-us-intelligence-community-russia-meddled-election/story?id=51091798

jcboy3

EyeSawYou wrote:

Here you are perpetuating the same lie that the Re... (show quote)

Not same lie. Trump lies. And if he admits to Russian meddling, where’s the beef? What are they doing to stop future meddling? Answer: nothing.

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

jcboy3 wrote:

Russians spent millions per month targeting voters in swing states to throw the election.

Republicans can’t win now without Russian support. It’s clear, Russians wanted anyone but Clinton.

Republicans deny Russian involvement in the election while obstructing the investigation. That, in and of itself, constitutes collusion.

As Trump said. Treason. Yes, that sounds right.

To date there is not a shred of evidence that a single vote was changed as a result of Russian intervention..

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

EyeSawYou wrote:

Lol pure nonsense..

However, Rosenstein underscored that there is "no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity" and "no allegation that this activity actually altered the outcome of the 2016 election." Trump won the election regardless of Russian influence or not.

This is indictments from the outside in, to get as much on the record befor Trump fires him and creates a firestorm.

This establishes that the election was a target of Russia, millions of dollars spent, but evidence of collusion with the campaign comes later, probably the last indictment causing the firestorm.

Unbelievable how much detail Meuller has.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

jcboy3 wrote:

No allegation in one indictment does not mean anyt... (show quote)

Absolutely Correct!!

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

EyeSawYou wrote:

Here you are perpetuating the same lie that the Re... (show quote)

Let’s see, trump won by 70,000 votes in three states, and Russia spent millions and millions, but to no avail???

Trump ain’t no legitimate, and that’s the least of his problems.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

boberic wrote:

To date there is not a shred of evidence that a single vote was changed as a result of Russian intervention..

You have no idea what evidence exists or doesn’t exist. You’re just singing Hope.

Did you notice the detail Mueller has in the indictment?

EyeSawYou

Twardlow wrote:

Let’s see, trump won by 70,000 votes in three states, and Russia spent millions and millions, but to no avail???

Trump ain’t no legitimate, and that’s the least of his problems.

Oh so now you think you know more than the FBI? LOLOLOLOL

EyeSawYou

Twardlow wrote:

You have no idea what evidence exists or doesn’t exist. You’re just singing Hope.

Did you notice the detail Mueller has in the indictment?

You have no idea what evidence exists or doesn't exist either, yet you believe you do know the evidence not yet revealed.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

EyeSawYou wrote:

Oh so now you think you know more than the FBI? LOLOLOLOL

Where did you read that i know better than the FBI? Of course that isn’t true, just a fig newton of your imagination—your violent, hostile, uninformed imagination.

Shot anybody lately?