Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Post-Processing Digital Images
Challenge Series: Stockholm, Sweden - Your Vision to Create Impact.
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 15, 2018 15:25:58   #
SoHillGuy Loc: Washington
 
Nonconformist.


(Download)

Reply
Feb 16, 2018 06:56:47   #
Shakey Loc: Traveling again to Norway and other places.
 
SoHillGuy wrote:
Nonconformist.


Yep, your image really is nonconformist, SoHillGuy. You went your own way, and I said the interpretation was to be yours. Perhaps you have a dislike of focal points for this image. Hence, no crop. The image does have a certain appeal in its complexity: unusual light sky but very dark reflections on the ice.
Would it appeal to a photo editor? Maybe - maybe not. You get four thumbs for your thinking:

Reply
Feb 16, 2018 08:12:02   #
Revet Loc: Fairview Park, Ohio
 
Shakey wrote:
Congratulations on you purchase, Revet. Now you need to practice with it. The sky is acceptable. The snow is blue, and the ice on the left is reflecting a blue sky that is not there. That ugly yellow patch shows how you let your adjustment tools run away with you. You cropped the way you wanted but it was not a good choice. You can do so much better than that. Maybe you rushed things with your new software. I'm sure you'll do better.
Three thumbs today my friend.
Congratulations on you purchase, Revet. Now you ne... (show quote)


LOL, I agree. I probably used every filter Luminar offers to play around with this photo. I remember when I first got Lightroom and Photoshop, I overbaked all my images but now use more subtle changes. The treatment of this photo is a good example that you need to get away from the image and come back to it later!!!

Thanks for the exercise!!

Reply
 
 
Feb 17, 2018 07:04:03   #
davefales Loc: Virginia
 
Jim-Pops wrote:
I have to agree with you on this point. I didn't like the water highlights on the lower right in the original picture as it was drawing to much attention to that area. After the cloning I did do some blur work to muddle the incorrect building reflections. I think your point is well taken and the best fix would be to crop a little more off the bottom.
Thanks for taking a look and commenting.
I have to agree with you on this point. I didn't l... (show quote)


back at ya

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 11:04:47   #
Shakey Loc: Traveling again to Norway and other places.
 
davefales wrote:
back at ya


Dave, you like to comment. However, if you read the preamble at the top of page 1, you'll see a request for members not to comment until they have posted their interpretation of the challenge. The problem is we get members posting comments telling us how to do it but they don't post an image in response to the challenge. This means they can talk the talk but not walk the walk. If you want to comment in future, please meet the challenge and post your interpretation. We would love to welcome you as a participating Challenge member.

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 13:36:53   #
Tatia Loc: Nv
 
Here is my effort for this challenge, which is a challenge. lol Finding it difficult to get a workflow going with so many filters to use and when to use them. So this is a learning experience.


(Download)

Reply
Feb 18, 2018 07:40:29   #
Shakey Loc: Traveling again to Norway and other places.
 
Tatia wrote:
Here is my effort for this challenge, which is a challenge. lol Finding it difficult to get a workflow going with so many filters to use and when to use them. So this is a learning experience.


WOW! Tatia, that is outstanding. The colors are bright and bold. I am impressed with almost everything. However, look at the sky at top left. The sky looks a little odd. This is because of the diagonal bands of color. This is known as banding; it's ugly and to be avoided at all costs. (Why does banding occur? Because you used one or more of your adjustment tools too strongly.) Look at the bottom right of your image and the dirty yellow reflection. There is nothing in your beautiful image which would create that yellow reflection just there (Red maybe). So that is a no-no. If you have reflections, let them reflect something in the image. The technique is to study your image and look for things that are wrong. There is always something that needs tweaking to create a perfect image. OK, you have learned a couple of things. I am delighted to give you five thumbs for an image with impact.

Reply
 
 
Feb 18, 2018 21:03:56   #
SalvageDiver Loc: Huntington Beach CA
 
Shakey wrote:
Here's Stockholm, Sweden at sunset. As you can see it very cold, the river is frozen. The photograph is interesting but lacks impact. Your challenge is to give the image impact.
To help members who struggle with visualizing the changes you need here are a few tips.

1. The sky area and the frozen river area are more or less the same size. This is a no-no, crop one or the other to draw the viewers eye to the focal point.

2. The tallest building in the old city is just off center. Another no-no if it is the point of interest. Crop one side or the other of the image to place it in a more eye catching position. Think of Rule of Thirds; The Golden Mean; Rule of Fifths; etc,. Rules are not set in concrete, place it where you thing it looks best.

3. The sky lacks detail. You may improve the sky or replace it. Your choice. The sun is setting behind the tallest buildings.

4. The ice on the river has some detail but it cold be improved. Should the ice reflect the color of the sky? Check on line to see how ice looks in the best images. Search Shutterstock.com or Google images.

5. Is the city too small? Do you need to zoom in on it?

6. Do not have two areas competing for attention. One area or object should be dominant. Everything else serves to aid impact.

Have at it any way you want. We need an image with IMPACT or the WOW factor.

PLEASE do not comment until you have posted your interpretation of the image below.

No RAW file. The .png file will be fine.
Here's Stockholm, Sweden at sunset. As you can see... (show quote)


Hi Shakey, a little late to the party, again. But, here's my edit.

Mike


(Download)

Reply
Feb 19, 2018 06:38:50   #
Shakey Loc: Traveling again to Norway and other places.
 
SalvageDiver wrote:
Hi Shakey, a little late to the party, again. But, here's my edit.

Mike


Better late than never, SalvageDiver. Yep, you gave this some thought with the pink clouds and all, but not enough. The snow is white, great. However, the buildings are subdued, almost washed out. You should be aiming for bold bright colors. There is way too much ice, which does nothing to enhance the image. You need to crop most of the bottom of the image. Maybe you rushed it because you were late to meet the challenge. You can do way better than this.
You get three thumbs this time.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Post-Processing Digital Images
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.