More for you to love .. or hate!
Ted H. Funk wrote:
Tom G: I've already answered that obvious question---he is supposedly photographing the reclining woman who is barely visible, not doing an advertisement for sheets, pillows, or duvets!
Apologies, Ted, for stepping on you toes. It wasn't meant to diminish your expert analysis.
Tom G: Comments on this website seem to be required to be complimentary, with justified
critiques being sarcastically put down or ridiculed. That's not the way to learn how to improve your photography. Good photographers are able to handle and work with criticism. That's how I learned---before I became a pro---to be a successful professional photographer which lasted for a period of 40-years!
Well Ted, I realize that you have answered the "obvious question"; I was merely saying what you already said, but in a different way. Mea Culpa... as I said above, I didn't mean to step on your sensitive "toes".
Also, there is no need for you to lecture me ( and others) on how to become a successful professional photographer.
Nice Photo, I agree with some of the others here that the lighting could be bumped up just a bit. My only other criticism is that it appears the model's left fingers are protruding from her right forearm. For me this is a minor distraction from an otherwise pleasing photo.
A bit too dark for my taste
NoSocks
Loc: quonochontaug, rhode island
twr25 wrote:
A bit too dark for my taste
But the bum is lit beautifully.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.