Is there a clear way to reduce or eliminate Moire patterns?
Jan 22, 2018 07:54:03 #
Jan 22, 2018 08:57:38 #
Jan 22, 2018 09:00:21 #
What about the original question. How to correct/fix the image after taken in processing via software like PS
Jan 22, 2018 09:05:10 #
droaden wrote:
What about the original question. How to correct/fix the image after taken in processing via software like PS
Actually, D ... the Topic Post question made no mention of Post Processors ... here >
Is there a clear way to reduce or eliminate Moire patterns?
What I was looking for was an answer with respect to doing it at the actual shoot ...
Repositioning, if it takes one away from the perspective one wishes to attain ... is not always the answer ....
So, I was hoping folks could suggest alternate ways, which might have some merit ....
Jan 22, 2018 09:23:03 #
Chris T wrote:
Oh, okay, Thruxton ... will take a look ...
So, then - you must be an advocate of the switch capability, then ...
Thanks for your input ....
So, then - you must be an advocate of the switch capability, then ...
Thanks for your input ....
Sure. Why not? Seems simple enough..... 🤔
Jan 22, 2018 09:34:44 #
danlsmith
Loc: Columbus Ohio
The technical, more detailed, itemized reply. Much better than 99% of the answers I've read on here. Its a good "Wow".
Jan 22, 2018 11:18:39 #
danlsmith wrote:
The technical, more detailed, itemized reply. Much better than 99% of the answers I've read on here. Its a good "Wow".
Well, thank you very much, Daniel ... I really appreciate the compliment ... share your feelings ... okay?
Thanks, again ....
Jan 22, 2018 11:23:29 #
Thruxton wrote:
Sure. Why not? Seems simple enough..... 🤔
Right now ... switches are the province of only Pentax K-3 and K-3II, and some Olympus models, I believe ... may also be on the new Nikon d850, though ....
Jan 22, 2018 18:56:01 #
Chris T wrote:
Right now ... switches are the province of only Pentax K-3 and K-3II, and some Olympus models, I believe ... may also be on the new Nikon d850, though ....
Actually, the way I understand it, the Sony RX1r II has three LPF options: Off, Standard, High. I think this may be a more recent feature, but I haven't researched it yet as I typically go for maximum detail. I've seen some software comparisons with other Sony models that may share selective LPF capabilities. I would have to investigate more thoroughly to be sure though. I kinda feel like I may be getting in over my head on this topic when I was just trying to be helpful. It's probably most critical for pro's who are enlarging to maximum limits, and I suppose pro level PP software can produce the same effects - all way beyond my ken.
Jan 22, 2018 19:57:10 #
Thruxton wrote:
Actually, the way I understand it, the Sony RX1r I... (show quote)
Don't sweat it, Thruxton ... it's a sticky wicket ... this Moire ... and getting rid of it ....
Most of the time, one doesn't have to worry about it ... but buildings are a problem ... and sometimes clothes can do it, too ...
I didn't realize Sony cams had a switch, too ... neat!!!
Jan 22, 2018 21:15:35 #
Chris T wrote:
Don't sweat it, Thruxton ... it's a sticky wicket ... this Moire ... and getting rid of it ....
Most of the time, one doesn't have to worry about it ... but buildings are a problem ... and sometimes clothes can do it, too ...
I didn't realize Sony cams had a switch, too ... neat!!!
Most of the time, one doesn't have to worry about it ... but buildings are a problem ... and sometimes clothes can do it, too ...
I didn't realize Sony cams had a switch, too ... neat!!!
Thanks for the tolerance. "Live long and prosper". V
Jan 22, 2018 21:58:48 #
Thruxton wrote:
Thanks for the tolerance. "Live long and prosper". V
Okay, Thruxton ... you, too ....
Jan 23, 2018 02:16:52 #
IDguy
Loc: Idaho
Chris T wrote:
Nikon started the mainstream AA-filterless trend with the D800E and its AA-filtered D800 twin. Both have been replaced by the D810. In total, Nikon currently offers five DSLRs without AA filters: the 36.4-megapixel full-frame D810, and the 24-megapixel APS-C D7200, D5500, D5300 and D3300, the latter of which, at $499 (including kit zoom), is the lowest-cost AA-less DSLR at the moment.
Actually many more. None of the latest generation Nikons use one.
Jan 23, 2018 02:23:42 #
IDguy wrote:
Actually many more. None of the latest generation Nikons use one.
So, the latest trend is to leave you open to the Moire Menace, huh, ID?
Jan 25, 2018 18:25:15 #
Chris T wrote:
And there were pairs of cameras which were introduced, a while back, which could be bought WITH the filters, or without them. So, the onus was on YOU, then.
That's right. The 5Ds and the 5Ds-R being such a pair.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.