Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
Using Luminar for processing photos
Jan 20, 2018 11:07:35   #
via the lens Loc: Northern California, near Yosemite NP
 
There are always a lot of questions on processing software on this site, including questions about Luminar. My primary processing program is Lightroom and I love this program for many reasons; it suffices for about 90% of my photos. From within LR I use many other programs depending on what I want to accomplish. I’ve been playing around with Luminar to see what it can do and I am impressed with the filters supplied in this program, the algorithms are definitely beyond what LR can do.

I was in the Grand Canyon last year and I went back to some of those images to see if Luminar could do anything to improve them and I found that it could and did improve the images. As it was the storm season there the light was not always the best and I wanted to see if I could improve on that in Luminar. Note that the program is based on a supplied set of filters that you can apply across the board to the image, just use a brush on, just use a graduated mask on, or just use Luminosity on. If you have used Photoshop, after clicking around on things, you’ll soon get the hang of the program. I think this is a good program for a beginner as the beginner can simply start out by using the filters as supplied and then learning more about what they do. In the end, in any program, you need to understand what happens to the image when you apply a filter and this knowledge comes with experience. Each filter, once applied, can be decreased as desired. I did use Photoshop on many of the photos but I think Luminar was able to really pull out some differentiation in the images and to improve them overall.

I like images that are sharp and detailed and Luminar helped a great deal with this on the mid-tone ranges in the images. I have included some images to show you the difference in the images from one program to the next. I do believe that we now have a tendency to oversaturate images and Luminar does seem to lean in this direction but for these images I tried to find a “happy medium” of reality and processing. I am posting these photos in a second post so that the post does not get kicked to another section.

Reply
Jan 20, 2018 11:12:39   #
via the lens Loc: Northern California, near Yosemite NP
 
via the lens wrote:
There are always a lot of questions on processing software on this site, including questions about Luminar. My primary processing program is Lightroom and I love this program for many reasons; it suffices for about 90% of my photos. From within LR I use many other programs depending on what I want to accomplish. I'™ve been playing around with Luminar to see what it can do and I am impressed with the filters supplied in this program, the algorithms are definitely beyond what LR can do.

I was in the Grand Canyon last year and I went back to some of those images to see if Luminar could do anything to improve them and I found that it could and did improve the images. As it was the storm season there the light was not always the best and I wanted to see if I could improve on that in Luminar. Note that the program is based on a supplied set of filters that you can apply across the board to the image, just use a brush on, just use a graduated mask on, or just use Luminosity on. If you have used Photoshop, after clicking around on things, you'™ll soon get the hang of the program. I think this is a good program for a beginner as the beginner can simply start out by using the filters as supplied and then learning more about what they do. In the end, in any program, you need to understand what happens to the image when you apply a filter and this knowledge comes with experience. Each filter, once applied, can be decreased as desired. I did use Photoshop on many of the photos but I think Luminar was able to really pull out some differentiation in the images and to improve them overall.

I like images that are sharp and detailed and Luminar helped a great deal with this on the mid-tone ranges in the images. I have included some images to show you the difference in the images from one program to the next. I do believe that we now have a tendency to oversaturate images and Luminar does seem to lean in this direction but for these images I tried to find a œhappy medium of reality and processing. I am posting these photos in a second post so that the post does not get kicked to another section.
There are always a lot of questions on processing ... (show quote)


Sorry, took a few minutes to post as this site software can be difficult to use at times.

Lightroom Only
Lightroom Only...
(Download)

Lightroom and Photoshop
Lightroom and Photoshop...
(Download)

Lighroom and Photoshop and Luminar
Lighroom and Photoshop and Luminar...
(Download)

Reply
Jan 20, 2018 11:20:40   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
Have you tried to use the “dehaze” slider in LR?

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2018 11:23:07   #
via the lens Loc: Northern California, near Yosemite NP
 
tdekany wrote:
Have you tried to use the “dehaze” slider in LR?


Yes, I have used every single slider in Lightroom and then some. I know the program very well and have taught it both privately and at a community college: I love the program and what it can do and I think I can max it out for the most part with most photos.

Reply
Jan 20, 2018 11:26:09   #
via the lens Loc: Northern California, near Yosemite NP
 
tdekany wrote:
Have you tried to use the “dehaze” slider in LR?


The LR photo was at Dehaze +39. It was just a tough weather situation, very dark so the mid-tones all wanted to run together.

Reply
Jan 20, 2018 12:01:07   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
via the lens wrote:
The LR photo was at Dehaze +39. It was just a tough weather situation, very dark so the mid-tones all wanted to run together.



Reply
Jan 20, 2018 14:43:36   #
ecobin Loc: Paoli, PA
 
via the lens wrote:
The LR photo was at Dehaze +39. It was just a tough weather situation, very dark so the mid-tones all wanted to run together.


Affinity Photo (AP) has a superior dehaze filter (in my opinion).

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2018 14:49:47   #
via the lens Loc: Northern California, near Yosemite NP
 
ecobin wrote:
Affinity Photo (AP) has a superior dehaze filter (in my opinion). I took your first photo (Lightroom only) and used the AP dehaze filter as well as a few other adjustments. Hope you don't mind my edits - just to show what can be done with AP. Nice capture!!


Hi, actually I do mind you messing with my photo, especially since my name is associated with it. Please delete the photo from your post. Thanks for the tip. I know and like Affinity, too. Just letting people know what Luminar can do and not just about a dehire filter. Please use your own photos and start your own thread on Affinity, I am sure people would like that. Thanks.

Reply
Mar 10, 2018 16:35:14   #
texaseve Loc: TX, NC and NH
 
I'd like to know what you did in PS, as I like the 2nd photo the best.:-)

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.