IR Pano of Mission Range Montana (PL)
Jan 5, 2018 01:02:51 #
Mission Range Charlo, Montana
Four frames processed in photoshop.
Nikon D70 (converted to IR) & 18-105mm lens.
Four frames processed in photoshop.
Nikon D70 (converted to IR) & 18-105mm lens.
Jan 5, 2018 01:40:01 #
Jan 5, 2018 03:04:53 #
Dave.Largent wrote:
Mission Range Charlo, Montana
Four frames processed in photoshop.
Nikon D70 (converted to IR) & 18-105mm lens.
Four frames processed in photoshop.
Nikon D70 (converted to IR) & 18-105mm lens.
Nice image. Different from mine. Nice processing. What filter do you have in your camera ( nm)?
Your camera is similar to my IR camera in specs. Mine is a converted Pentax K-100D, 6.1 MP CCD Sensor, 667nm filter. I usually use a 35mm or 50mm lens.
Jan 5, 2018 10:07:08 #
lamiaceae wrote:
Nice image. Different from mine. Nice processing. What filter do you have in your camera ( nm)?
Your camera is similar to my IR camera in specs. Mine is a converted Pentax K-100D, 6.1 MP CCD Sensor, 667nm filter. I usually use a 35mm or 50mm lens.
Your camera is similar to my IR camera in specs. Mine is a converted Pentax K-100D, 6.1 MP CCD Sensor, 667nm filter. I usually use a 35mm or 50mm lens.
I'm not sure which filter is in my IR camera, I bought it from someone that had converted it and was not sure which filter had been installed. I have a blue tint to the grass areas and a slight red orange tint to the sky on the raw files, see below. Do you know which filter most likely is installed?
Jan 6, 2018 07:36:06 #
Jan 6, 2018 10:32:08 #
BboH wrote:
Great detail - or is that the norm for IR?
I have found that IR does have a lot of detail. Although part of it may be that we are not distracted by a lot of color and notice it more.
Thanks for the comment.
Dave
Jan 6, 2018 23:56:01 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.