Thank God for sanctuary cities. The poor undocumented immigrant who was homeless was thankfully found not guilty of killing Kate Steinle.
I am sure her parents are also grateful for the verdict seeing as they were strong proponents of sanctuary cities and voted for obummer twice because of his greatness in protecting poor innocent homeless immigrants like the wrongfully accused victim himself of the horrible Trump/Republican system.
I am sure they are thrilled that their daughter was able to die to prove how wonderful sanctuary cities are and they absolutely deserve what happened.
This is a great day for America and the democrat policies that protect the poor homeless undocumented immigrants. This is a great and wonderful day and we are all proud of the verdict of Not Guilty.
So does this prick get to stay here? I wish California would just go away.....maybe the big one will hit soon - ocean front property in Nevada would be nice....
I notice there are no comments from the libs about this.
I am sure they are so proud that their comrade literally got away with murder. I can't imagine a citizen with no record would have faired so well 'eh.
BigBear wrote:
I notice there are no comments from the libs about this.
I am sure they are so proud that their comrade literally got away with murder. I can't imagine a citizen with no record would have faired so well 'eh.
IMHO, there is NO ONE who is "proud" when someone is killed.
As always, we think we know all of the facts, but we weren't on the jury.
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
I just don't understand why he was not found guilty of involuntary manslaughter. His actions exactly fit that discription. Either the jury ot the prosecutor had their heads up their asses. I have been up and down the coast of Ca. several times. NEVER AGAIN. I have family in CA. I will not go there they will have to come here. I think that somehow people change when they move to Ca,. I think all that shaking from the earthquakes scrambles their brains.
chrisscholbe wrote:
IMHO, there is NO ONE who is "proud" when someone is killed.
As always, we think we know all of the facts, but we weren't on the jury.
The facts were given.
Justice was not served for anyone.
This is truly obscene.
The only 'facts' that matter are that he was an illegal, convicted of multiple violent felonies, with multiple deportations and illegal re-entries.
skylane5sp wrote:
This is truly obscene.
The only 'facts' that matter are that he was an illegal, convicted of multiple violent felonies, with multiple deportations and illegal re-entries.
I don't believe anyone is disputing that he is illegal.
Is it your opinion that he:
1) killed her deliberately
2) killed her accidently
3) doesn't matter because he is illegal?
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
chrisscholbe wrote:
I don't believe anyone is disputing that he is illegal.
Is it your opinion that he:
1) killed her deliberately
2) killed her accidently
3) doesn't matter because he is illegal?
It doesn't matter that he was illegal, he was not tried for that. He did not kill her deliberately, the bullet ricoched off a wall. He DID kill her accidentally. That is the classic definition of involuntary manslaughter. For which there is a stiff penalty. The conviction of illegal weapons possession alone is an insult to the justice system. California is a discrace
boberic wrote:
It doesn't matter that he was illegal, he was not tried for that. He did not kill her deliberately, the bullet ricoched off a wall. He DID kill her accidentally. That is the classic definition of involuntary manslaughter. For which there is a stiff penalty. The conviction of illegal weapons possession alone is an insult to the justice system. California is a discrace
If one is to believe that he "found" the gun on the pier, then I think even the possession charge is bogus.
However, I am very skeptical that he "found" the gun...which means possession is the minimum and that since he shouldn't even have had the gun,in the first place,
Involuntary Manslaughter would be appropriate.
skylane5sp wrote:
This is truly obscene.
The only 'facts' that matter are that he was an illegal, convicted of multiple violent felonies, with multiple deportations and illegal re-entries.
Dam shame Kate's dad was not carrying he could have administrated justice right on the spot.
skylane5sp wrote:
This is truly obscene.
The only 'facts' that matter are that he was an illegal, convicted of multiple violent felonies, with multiple deportations and illegal re-entries.
He was/is an illegal. He
does not have a history of violence He does have multiple deportations and illegal reentries. The bullet bounced off the ground more than 80 feet from the victim before killing her. That's fairly impressive gunmanship, or it could have been an accident as was reported. Anyone here care to claim they could do that?
As long as it can be used to put forward your beliefs, the facts really aren't that important to you, are they?
drainbamage wrote:
So does this prick get to stay here? I wish California would just go away.....maybe the big one will hit soon - ocean front property in Nevada would be nice....
And here I thought that You Thought this was a wonderful world on a wonderful day, and only I was the one filled with hate.
Truth has a way of outing itself, as it has in your case.
boberic wrote:
It doesn't matter that he was illegal, he was not tried for that. He did not kill her deliberately, the bullet ricoched off a wall. He DID kill her accidentally. That is the classic definition of involuntary manslaughter. For which there is a stiff penalty. The conviction of illegal weapons possession alone is an insult to the justice system. California is a discrace
involuntary manslaughter usual involves negligence. I wasn't there. I haven't been glued to the tube following it, but I am unaware of negligence.
The ranger who allowed the gun to be taken from his vehicle should have been held accountable instead of having been given a promotion.
BigBear wrote:
The facts were given.
Justice was not served for anyone.
Once again you ‘prove’ that you know more than anyone or more than everyone. When someone think he knows more than reality, when he thinks he is the judge of reality, he soon thinks he should rule reality, and that’s when the trouble sets in, and a career ends in the rubber room.
Satisfactory mental health doesn’t mean someone who judges reality, or someone who defines reality, but someone who strives to
understand reality.
Try it you’ll sleep better, and it will keep you out of the sanitarium.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.