Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
How to convert either NEF, JPG or TIFF to PDF?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Nov 18, 2017 09:50:51   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
I created a PDF version of a JPG file using gimp. The two pictures looked exactly the same on the screen to my eyes, but I cannot vouch for a large print. The OP never did tell us how to recognize the problem he's concerned about, so that's as far I can take this end of the discussion.

Reply
Nov 18, 2017 10:06:36   #
blackest Loc: Ireland
 
Clapperboard wrote:
burkphoto You are describing printing such as is used in packaging and books etc. I have worked with/supplied data to printing firms catering for that type of 'industrial printing' when getting books printed. My wife worked in packaging printing for some years where the production of plates and multi colour presses printing onto plastic packaging was the core business. That would not be the way to print a few photographs. In fact it is most unlikely the prints would be able to show all the subtle tones of a photograph. The superb prints of Ansel Adams original fabulous photographs still fall short of the actual photograph. I have had both versions in my hand to view.
The OP says he wants to get prints of a photograph.
burkphoto You are describing printing such as is... (show quote)


I have produced for print in this way and got a very professional result. A photo as a pdf file at 300dpi should be no different from a photo produced from a jpeg at 300 dpi. Affinity Designer is great for this if you are going to the edge of the page just allow 3mm bleed for when they crop to the final page size. I use the same files to produce a pdf for the web but use a lower resolution for the photos when i export.

A lot of people like to have photo books made or electronic books (which can be tricky if its a reflow-able layout).

For tablets it's best to have a bit more resolution than the device supports.

Maybe this will do as an example https://www.blackestknight.com/photography/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Diary2.pdf it's not designed for print and has been scaled down for screen use.

Reply
Nov 18, 2017 10:19:39   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Clapperboard wrote:
Aaaaghhhhhhh ! All this talk of compression loss comparison. My worry is do you really want to print PHOTOGRAPHS from PDF files? I make PDF documents to accompany instruction talks. The images print very well for those handout sheets but I would not want to print my images to be framed and displayed from the same files. Any conversion to an eight bit file throws away some of the information recorded by the camera. Modern cameras record images in fourteen bit. Setting the camera to record in JPEG instead of RAW instantly compromises the recorded image as a JPEG is an eight bit format. Capturing in RAW and then printing from PDF will also throw away some of the recorded information. Who wants to buy a Rolls Royce or a Cadillac and then drive around in the delivery truck?
Aaaaghhhhhhh ! All this talk of compression loss ... (show quote)


He said he is sending a file to a [graphic arts industry CMYK] *printer,* not a photo lab. Never the twain shall meet... They have very different standards for file input.

Reply
 
 
Nov 18, 2017 10:25:37   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Clapperboard wrote:
burkphoto You are describing printing such as is used in packaging and books etc. I have worked with/supplied data to printing firms catering for that type of 'industrial printing' when getting books printed. My wife worked in packaging printing for some years where the production of plates and multi colour presses printing onto plastic packaging was the core business. That would not be the way to print a few photographs. In fact it is most unlikely the prints would be able to show all the subtle tones of a photograph. The superb prints of Ansel Adams original fabulous photographs still fall short of the actual photograph. I have had both versions in my hand to view.
The OP says he wants to get prints of a photograph.
burkphoto You are describing printing such as is... (show quote)


Usually there is a very clear distinction between the terms, “printer” and “photo lab.” If the print is for wide distribution, CMYK makes great sense, as it is less expensive per piece in quantity.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.