Kuzano wrote:
Kodak did their time in FF camera's by collaberati... (
show quote)
I find the "Fast-----Slow" label on the ...shutter dial(?) interesting.
According to the article below, the top is from Sigma body.
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/kodakslrc"
As we've already noted the top of the camera is clearly straight from a Sigma SA9 / SD9 / SD10, the main body however is a custom design for Kodak, and to be frank isn't pretty."
Kuzano wrote:
Kodak did their time in FF camera's by collaberati... (
show quote)
It's much better to get a Canon FF of the same period.
BebuLamar wrote:
It's much better to get a Canon FF of the same period.
Only if you are willing to give up the excellent color renditions. And the 5d Canon was fewer MP. 12.1. Perhaps one of the more expensive Canons. I would want to see image comparisions, as Canon has never been ranked highly on it's image quality during that time.
Kuzano wrote:
Kodak did their time in FF camera's by collaberati... (
show quote)
I had the Kodak= with Nikon mount system. (my brother has it now)
The IQ is excellent though DR limited. As a studio camera it is stil a very good tool.The biggest problem with these now is the batteries are no longer available.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.