Contrast and compare
Nov 15, 2017 08:47:52 #
I hope this is the right place for this question. It is specific. These 2 are the same image processed in the same way. The only difference is the cropping. Which is better compositionally?
Nov 15, 2017 08:50:14 #
To me the bottom one, in that the other car and second person's legs are removed. Even in the bottom one, the legs in the background are distracting.
Nov 15, 2017 09:04:14 #
Nov 15, 2017 09:08:55 #
Neither. I know this is a question about the processing. But, until you remove the distracting legs in the background and present the subject against a clean background, there can't be a relevant discussion of the image.
Nov 15, 2017 09:14:25 #
And I like the legs in the background of #2 - it adds setting. #2 is better balanced, has fewer distractions.
Nov 15, 2017 09:51:38 #
The second suits my eye better because of the lower perspective. But neither photo is really nothing more than a snapshot.
Nov 15, 2017 11:29:37 #
tinplater wrote:
The second suits my eye better because of the lower perspective. But neither photo is really nothing more than a snapshot.
I accept that you think the image is a snapshot. Now I ask you,"How could I create a more interesting photo?"
Nov 15, 2017 11:56:27 #
Chefneil wrote:
I accept that you think the image is a snapshot. Now I ask you,"How could I create a more interesting photo?"
You've shown you have a sense of what to do in cropping closer ... You should also have asked the guy in the jeans to move out of the background while still getting closer to the subject until it fills the frame.
Nov 16, 2017 10:42:26 #
Chefneil wrote:
I hope this is the right place for this question. It is specific. These 2 are the same image processed in the same way. The only difference is the cropping. Which is better compositionally?
Second one, but removing those legs would help.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.