Storm Clouds Half Dome --- Yosemite National Park: I found this shot while cleaning up my Lightroom catalog, it's a reprocess of a JPEG file. The original was shot 5 years ago in April...

flyguy Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico

I found this shot while cleaning up my Lightroom catalog, it's a reprocess of a JPEG file. The original was shot 5 years ago in April of 2012.

All comments are welcome.

(Download)

PixelStan77 Loc: Vermont/Chicago

flyguy wrote:

I found this shot while cleaning up my Lightroom catalog, it's a reprocess of a JPEG file. The original was shot 5 years ago in April of 2012.

All comments are welcome.

Nice image. Wonder what it would look like converted to dramatic Black and White

rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA

Another great reason to be shooting in RAW.

rlaugh Loc: Michigan & Florida

Beautiful shot!!

flyguy Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico

PixelStan77 wrote:

Nice image. Wonder what it would look like converted to dramatic Black and White

Thank you and I'll try it in b & w.

flyguy Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico

rgrenaderphoto wrote:

Another great reason to be shooting in RAW.

What???

Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States

rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA

flyguy wrote:

What???

If you had shot this in RAW format, you options to work with the image and bring out hidden textures and light would have been enhanced 100%. With digital photography, unless you are a press photog on a tight deadline, there is no real reason to shoot in JPG format. It really, really puts a lid on your potential.

jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY

Beautiful

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

I tried. This one would be difficult. There is a bit of pixelation going on in the download image.
--Bob

PixelStan77 wrote:

Nice image. Wonder what it would look like converted to dramatic Black and White

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

--Bob

rgrenaderphoto wrote:

Another great reason to be shooting in RAW.

and

Quote:

If you had shot this in RAW format, you options to work with the image and bring out hidden textures and light would have been enhanced 100%. With digital photography, unless you are a press photog on a tight deadline, there is no real reason to shoot in JPG format. It really, really puts a lid on your potential.

tbell7D Loc: Houston

Excellent, a very appealing image.

imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida

flyguy wrote:

I found this shot while cleaning up my Lightroom catalog, it's a reprocess of a JPEG file. The original was shot 5 years ago in April of 2012.

All comments are welcome.

It is a nice subject and scene - but IMO, it does need some serious PP. I have reprocessed the down load if you would like to see it or have me post it here ?? I could not resist - I do not do this often.......

photophile Loc: Lakewood, Ohio, USA

flyguy wrote:

I found this shot while cleaning up my Lightroom catalog, it's a reprocess of a JPEG file. The original was shot 5 years ago in April of 2012.

All comments are welcome.

Attractive effect flyguy.

imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida

rgrenaderphoto wrote:

If you had shot this in RAW format, you options to work with the image and bring out hidden textures and light would have been enhanced 100%. With digital photography, unless you are a press photog on a tight deadline, there is no real reason to shoot in JPG format. It really, really puts a lid on your potential.

OR, if you had shot it at the correct exposure - that would help too ....