Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
carbon fiber or aluminum
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Sep 20, 2017 14:11:17   #
augieg27 Loc: Central California
 
I have an aluminum Zomei with a decent ball head that cost me around $100. I'd tried in windy situations and have behaved well. The CF is only about $30 more. Of course, I'm not a professional and it is good enough for me. Anyone has tried?

Reply
Sep 20, 2017 14:17:26   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
I have never regretted buying my carbon fiber tripod! Aluminum gets heavier the further you have to carry it!

Reply
Sep 20, 2017 16:43:25   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 


And how long did it take you to find an Induro aluminum?

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2017 17:10:14   #
AlfredU Loc: Mooresville, NC
 
innershield wrote:
The tripod I am looking at, an Induro carbon fiber model that costs exactly twice as much as the aluminum model with a .8 lb weight savings. Is it worth it. I am not a professional

No.

Reply
Sep 20, 2017 17:12:49   #
AlfredU Loc: Mooresville, NC
 
foathog wrote:
I have a Tilt All (made my C.M. Marchioni in Rutherford, NJ) aluminum that I bought used for 30 bucks in 1975. It's very well made.

You better hang on to that Marconi. Especially if it was one he made himself. Nobody makes them like that anymore.

Reply
Sep 20, 2017 23:59:33   #
skywolf
 
Depends on how you plan on using the tripod. I have a 1988 model Bogen aluminum video tripod. It will hold my D7100 and my Tamron 150-600mm lens in 35mph winds (at least), but I don't want to carry it into the woods. My carbon fiber Slik tripod is lightweight and as long as there's not a lot of wind, will handle the above camera/lens combination. Yeah, you don't want to expose carbon fiber to extreme elements for very long. The Slik cost me $80 new and besides being too short for me, it works great.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 01:01:59   #
Vince68 Loc: Wappingers Falls, NY
 
Gene51 wrote:
It depends on which two you are looking at. The weight savings may not be the only difference. Torsional rigidity is generally better in carbon tripods with the same tube diameters as the aluminum ones. I am pretty sure Induro has abandoned aluminum, as has Gitzo, and several other manufacturers. The price of carbon fiber has come down, and with their better performance, and lighter weight, the carbon tripods represent a better value.


Gene, You are right, Induro doesn't have any aluminum tripods on their website anymore, they are all listed as "discontinued products". They are only offering carbon fiber ones now. B&H and Adorama only had Induro CF legs. Amazon has one Aluminum model listed, the AKB1 for $115.00. Other than the one on Amazon, I couldn't find any aluminum Induro legs anywhere. Not sure where the OP found them.

Reply
 
 
Sep 21, 2017 01:26:57   #
RichieC Loc: Adirondacks
 
Aluminum has been found to resonate even in a light breeze. Nature of metal, especially light weight. Not sure on that brand as there are other things to consider like the rest of the fittings etc.

I do carry mine into the back country, so I went for a Gitzo mountaineer to carry. I will never ever part with it, most don't. Knowing how they are built, I would't hesitate to look on ebay for a top of the line used tripod like RRS or Gitzo, etc… to save $$$ . You only buy them once and never look back, but they do come dear even used . Because they last forever and are thus a commodity … Kinda says all you need to know right there.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 12:37:22   #
seniormomentnw Loc: Seattle
 
In well-made tripods, carbon fiber is better than aluminum for damping vibration. The longer the lens, the more important this is. Sadly, good tripods are expensive. A common, common mistake is buying lesser tripods, finding they don't do the job, then buying slightly more expensive ones, finding they don't do the job, and on and on until a good tripod is finally acquired. In the long run, it's more cost-effective to buy the really good one first. I will repeat: sadly, good tripods are expensive. I know, this is not what people want to hear.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 13:35:48   #
innershield Loc: phoenix, az
 
I should of clarified that the other issue was the inexpensive head that came with the tripod. couldn't support my 150 -600 zoom. I put a Wimberley head on it and it supported the lens fine. The Wimberley is just not practical for portraits or other stuff. Hence the search for a quality tripod and ball head.

Reply
Sep 23, 2017 21:13:32   #
innershield Loc: phoenix, az
 
just got my Benro Tad38c w/B3 ball head. What an improvement over my aluminum tripod and "trigger " head. Well worth the expense. Happy. Will use original tripod with Wimberley head. Thanks for opinions

Reply
 
 
Sep 23, 2017 21:23:10   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
innershield wrote:
I have an aluminum tripod that's pretty sturdy but the trigger head would not support a 150-600 tamron for sky shots. Got a Wimberley for that and now I would like a sturdy tripod for long exposure images. I like the damping of carbon and the benro head. Kinda pricey for an enthusiast but I think I will grow into it. Thanks for input


I use a heavy bean bag to suppress vibrations. You can hang it under the tripod, but don't let it swing.

A bean bag can be filled with rocks if hiking. I keep one filled with gravel. It makes a big difference. And it lowers the center of gravity.

Reply
Sep 24, 2017 14:10:32   #
RichardSM Loc: Back in Texas
 
innershield wrote:
just got my Benro Tad38c w/B3 ball head. What an improvement over my aluminum tripod and "trigger " head. Well worth the expense. Happy. Will use original tripod with Wimberley head. Thanks for opinions


I have a Benro CF very well made product, quality control is great no rough edges on legs work smooth no binding and the same for the Benro B2 Ballhead.

I've owned mine a year now. The price's on these Benro CF tripods are very reasonable you can't go wrong in my opinion.

Reply
Sep 24, 2017 14:55:54   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
innershield wrote:
The tripod I am looking at, an Induro carbon fiber model that costs exactly twice as much as the aluminum model with a .8 lb weight savings. Is it worth it. I am not a professional


The traditional rules for tripods are rapidly changing as image stabilization improves. If you are using older long heavy lenses an exceptional sturdy tripod is likely a good investment. OTOH....

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.