Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
First attempt at Milky Way Photos
Page 1 of 2 next>
Sep 18, 2017 14:32:00   #
alandg46 Loc: Boerne, Texas
 
I took the first two of these last Saturday night with a Nikon D800E with a 16-35mm F4. I did not have my tripod nor my remote shutter release, so the camera was propped up on the roof of my car with my laptop bag and a pillow. I used a 2-second delay. I just pointed the camera at the sky and pressed the shutter. They are both 30 seconds, F4, and ISO 2000. I was so encouraged by these I went home Sunday and returned that night with my Pentax K-3 with the GPS attached and my Pentax 16-50mm F2.8. I brought the tripod and the remote shutter release. I tried again and my cousin and I fooled around with light painting. It was a total learning experience.

The location was about 20 miles west of Junction, Texas on my family ranch.

The last six are with the Pentax at 1600 ISO.

The GPS astrotracker on the K-3 gave me shocking amounts of time with the shutter open with little discernible star trails. I was impressed.

I'm going to try this some more. I need to find some good foregrounds to make it all work.

Nikon at 30 seconds
Nikon at 30 seconds...
(Download)

Nikon at 30 seconds
Nikon at 30 seconds...
(Download)

127 seconds. Some star movement seen.
127 seconds. Some star movement seen....
(Download)

57 seconds
57 seconds...
(Download)

44 seconds. Trying light painting
44 seconds. Trying light painting...
(Download)

44 seconds
44 seconds...
(Download)

45 seconds
45 seconds...
(Download)

38 seconds
38 seconds...
(Download)

Reply
Sep 18, 2017 14:42:41   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Nice shots!

Reply
Sep 18, 2017 14:55:42   #
lightcatcher Loc: Farmington, NM (4 corners)
 
Very good first attempt...keep it going by doing more.

Reply
 
 
Sep 18, 2017 15:00:26   #
alandg46 Loc: Boerne, Texas
 
Longshadow wrote:
Nice shots!


Thank you.

Reply
Sep 18, 2017 15:00:49   #
Tet68survivor Loc: Pomfret Center CT
 
Even without all the high tech stuff, you did a great job!

Reply
Sep 18, 2017 15:00:57   #
alandg46 Loc: Boerne, Texas
 
lightcatcher wrote:
Very good first attempt...keep it going by doing more.


Thank you, I intend to.

Reply
Sep 18, 2017 15:02:06   #
alandg46 Loc: Boerne, Texas
 
Tet68survivor wrote:
Even without all the high tech stuff, you did a great job!


I was very pleasantly surprised. Thank you.

Reply
 
 
Sep 18, 2017 15:09:04   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Very nice.

Reply
Sep 18, 2017 15:19:19   #
hotline Loc: Saudi Arabia
 
Great shots.

Reply
Sep 18, 2017 16:03:24   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
I like the 2nd to the last image with the silhouette of the tree. But why you switched to the APS-C camera body is what I'd like to know. The Nikon should net much better results with the FF sensor that is one of the best in the world. I don't know if you've looked up the proper settings for shooting this or not but I just attended a seminar on night photography and they, Ken Sklute, suggest starting with this:

FF body
16mm or close to that at f/2.8 at ISO 3200 for 30 seconds. Any longer than a 30 sec exposure and the stars will not be round because of the earths rotation. So if you are using a f/4 lens which is one stop slower than f/2.8, you'd use a one stop more ISO or 6400. It's much better to use at least a f/2.8 lens though. The rule of thumb to get pinpoint stars, use the “500 rule,” which calls for you to divide 500 by the focal length of the lens you’re using. If you’re working with a crop sensor camera be sure to account for the crop factor (typically 1.5). Use tungsten W/B or somewhere around 4800 color temp. Don't use auto w/b. And take a picture using the same camera settings with the lens cap on so that you can see the sensor noise on a long exposure on a black image. Don't forget to turn off all your camera lights including the LCD, picture review, etc.a and put tape on any other lights your camera might exhibit. Also, cover your eyepiece.

Of course, you can use a crop sensor body, but you'll have to do the math on the focal length etc. You may have more noise to deal with though.

alandg46 wrote:
I took the first two of these last Saturday night with a Nikon D800E with a 16-35mm F4. I did not have my tripod nor my remote shutter release, so the camera was propped up on the roof of my car with my laptop bag and a pillow. I used a 2-second delay. I just pointed the camera at the sky and pressed the shutter. They are both 30 seconds, F4, and ISO 2000. I was so encouraged by these I went home Sunday and returned that night with my Pentax K-3 with the GPS attached and my Pentax 16-50mm F2.8. I brought the tripod and the remote shutter release. I tried again and my cousin and I fooled around with light painting. It was a total learning experience.

The location was about 20 miles west of Junction, Texas on my family ranch.

The last six are with the Pentax at 1600 ISO.

The GPS astrotracker on the K-3 gave me shocking amounts of time with the shutter open with little discernible star trails. I was impressed.

I'm going to try this some more. I need to find some good foregrounds to make it all work.
I took the first two of these last Saturday night ... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 18, 2017 17:12:26   #
alandg46 Loc: Boerne, Texas
 
jeep_daddy wrote:
I like the 2nd to the last image with the silhouette of the tree. But why you switched to the APS-C camera body is what I'd like to know. The Nikon should net much better results with the FF sensor that is one of the best in the world. I don't know if you've looked up the proper settings for shooting this or not but I just attended a seminar on night photography and they, Ken Sklute, suggest starting with this:

FF body
16mm or close to that at f/2.8 at ISO 3200 for 30 seconds. Any longer than a 30 sec exposure and the stars will not be round because of the earths rotation. So if you are using a f/4 lens which is one stop slower than f/2.8, you'd use a one stop more ISO or 6400. It's much better to use at least a f/2.8 lens though. The rule of thumb to get pinpoint stars, use the “500 rule,” which calls for you to divide 500 by the focal length of the lens you’re using. If you’re working with a crop sensor camera be sure to account for the crop factor (typically 1.5). Use tungsten W/B or somewhere around 4800 color temp. Don't use auto w/b. And take a picture using the same camera settings with the lens cap on so that you can see the sensor noise on a long exposure on a black image. Don't forget to turn off all your camera lights including the LCD, picture review, etc.a and put tape on any other lights your camera might exhibit. Also, cover your eyepiece.

Of course, you can use a crop sensor body, but you'll have to do the math on the focal length etc. You may have more noise to deal with though.
I like the 2nd to the last image with the silhouet... (show quote)


The Pentax with the GPS unit and the Astrotracer enable allows a much extended shutter duration, by moving the sensor. With the Astrotracer enabled when you go to bulb, the camera shuts off all lights and goes to mirror up. The Nikon even with a F 2.8 lens cannot do this. Further the noise on a K-3 is not bad at all. I know I have one of each plus a D500. In fact I should have tried this on my Pentax K-5. It is marginally better than the K-3. In any case the noise on the Pentaxes under normal use is more pleasing to me than the Nikons.

Doing the math with the Astrotracer enable is just a starting point. You must experiment to find how far you can go. Note that one of the photos with the Pentax the shutter was open for 147 seconds. That appeared to me just past the limit. There is no way that the Nikon could have gotten there even with a 2.8 lens.

Reply
 
 
Sep 19, 2017 07:00:59   #
canondave1 Loc: Houston, TX
 
alandg46 wrote:
I took the first two of these last Saturday night with a Nikon D800E with a 16-35mm F4. I did not have my tripod nor my remote shutter release, so the camera was propped up on the roof of my car with my laptop bag and a pillow. I used a 2-second delay. I just pointed the camera at the sky and pressed the shutter. They are both 30 seconds, F4, and ISO 2000. I was so encouraged by these I went home Sunday and returned that night with my Pentax K-3 with the GPS attached and my Pentax 16-50mm F2.8. I brought the tripod and the remote shutter release. I tried again and my cousin and I fooled around with light painting. It was a total learning experience.

The location was about 20 miles west of Junction, Texas on my family ranch.

The last six are with the Pentax at 1600 ISO.

The GPS astrotracker on the K-3 gave me shocking amounts of time with the shutter open with little discernible star trails. I was impressed.

I'm going to try this some more. I need to find some good foregrounds to make it all work.
I took the first two of these last Saturday night ... (show quote)


Those are wonderful images of the sky you created! Junction is a good area for night sky photography. I grew up there and had some great times.

Reply
Sep 19, 2017 07:14:42   #
alandg46 Loc: Boerne, Texas
 
canondave1 wrote:
Those are wonderful images of the sky you created! Junction is a good area for night sky photography. I grew up there and had some great times.


Thank you. Junction is a great place for night sky photography/

Reply
Sep 19, 2017 09:03:35   #
Mary Kate Loc: NYC
 
alandg46 wrote:
I took the first two of these last Saturday night with a Nikon D800E with a 16-35mm F4. I did not have my tripod nor my remote shutter release, so the camera was propped up on the roof of my car with my laptop bag and a pillow. I used a 2-second delay. I just pointed the camera at the sky and pressed the shutter. They are both 30 seconds, F4, and ISO 2000. I was so encouraged by these I went home Sunday and returned that night with my Pentax K-3 with the GPS attached and my Pentax 16-50mm F2.8. I brought the tripod and the remote shutter release. I tried again and my cousin and I fooled around with light painting. It was a total learning experience.

The location was about 20 miles west of Junction, Texas on my family ranch.

The last six are with the Pentax at 1600 ISO.

The GPS astrotracker on the K-3 gave me shocking amounts of time with the shutter open with little discernible star trails. I was impressed.

I'm going to try this some more. I need to find some good foregrounds to make it all work.
I took the first two of these last Saturday night ... (show quote)


I am going to have to try taking night pictures. Very nice. Don't much care for the light painting.

Reply
Sep 19, 2017 09:10:59   #
alandg46 Loc: Boerne, Texas
 
Mary Kate wrote:
I am going to have to try taking night pictures. Very nice. Don't much care for the light painting.


Thank you. The light painting part was experimental. My cousin and I had no idea what we were doing. We did get some ideas for a future attempt and some "don't try this again" stuff.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.