Fred & Glenda
Sep 19, 2017 08:33:21 #
Apaflo wrote:
Candid? They are posing! Virtually nobody accepts such shots as Street Photograpy, other than the undefined "by MY definition" folks who have no definition.
Posing?..do you know for sure that they knew their picture was being taken?
Sep 19, 2017 08:40:27 #
rlaugh wrote:
Posing?..do you know for sure that they knew their picture was being taken?
They are performing, and everything they do designed to be watched by an audience. That is the opposite of candid.
Sep 19, 2017 09:42:44 #
Apaflo wrote:
They are performing, and everything they do designed to be watched by an audience. That is the opposite of candid.
They are performing for a music audience, not for a photography group, so to me, I think this is a candid shot by a photographer walking by, taking a shot of a happening...just my opinion.
Sep 19, 2017 10:04:31 #
rlaugh wrote:
They are performing for a music audience, not for a photography group, so to me, I think this is a candid shot by a photographer walking by, taking a shot of a happening...just my opinion.
Thank you.
Sep 19, 2017 11:41:12 #
rlaugh wrote:
They are performing for a music audience, not for a photography group, so to me, I think this is a candid shot by a photographer walking by, taking a shot of a happening...just my opinion.
+1
Sep 19, 2017 11:59:25 #
Apaflo wrote:
Candid? They are posing! Virtually nobody accepts such shots as Street Photograpy, other than the undefined "by MY definition" folks who have no definition.
"We accept almost any inclusive definition of Street Photography, and will not exclude any discussion or image if a member feels it is appropriate to Street Photography."
Sep 19, 2017 12:30:39 #
dsmeltz wrote:
"We accept almost any inclusive definition of Street Photography, and will not exclude any discussion or image if a member feels it is appropriate to Street Photography."
The image has been accepted for discussion purposes, exactly per the section guidelines. Despite false claims of deletions and bans, the image and the OP are, per the guidelines, still here. Thank you for pointing that out.
Sep 19, 2017 12:34:24 #
Apaflo wrote:
The image has been accepted for discussion purposes, exactly per the section guidelines. Despite false claims of deletions and bans, the image and the OP are, per the guidelines, still here. Thank you for pointing that out.
Thanks for understanding why I posted.
Sep 19, 2017 12:40:37 #
Sep 19, 2017 12:42:02 #
Retired fat guy with a camera
Loc: Colorado
Has anyone else noticed that, when you disagree with apaflo, he accuses you of bullying. When in fact it quite the opposite.
Sep 19, 2017 12:44:26 #
Retired fat guy with a camera wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that, when you disagree with apaflo, he accuses you of bullying. When in fact it quite the opposite.
What is this ad hominem attack about? It is just floating out there with nothing referenced. It is just an unsupported personal attack. It might be the very definition of bullying.
Sep 19, 2017 12:57:17 #
Retired fat guy with a camera wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that, when you disagree with apaflo, he accuses you of bullying. When in fact it quite the opposite.
In the future please follow the guidelines provided for appropriate behavior when posting to this section.
Sep 19, 2017 19:41:17 #
Sep 19, 2017 19:43:26 #
jaymatt wrote:
Pickin' & singin' at the market
Nicely done John! One of these days I will have to try my hand at street photography
Terry
Sep 19, 2017 21:51:43 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.