I would if I knew I'd be photographing a scene that required one. Since the scenes I've done, to date, didn't require a GND, I opted for a B+H filter. --Bob
Mary Kate wrote:
If you wanted to purchase an ND Filter would you consider a Graduated ND Filter over a solid ND Filter?
Graduated ND filters are far more convenient but single filters are said to produce better results, you just need more of them. I have a really nice graduated filter and I have no complaints with the results. It was fairly expensive.
I would if I knew I'd be photographing a scene that required one. Since the scenes I've done, to date, didn't require a GND, I opted for a B+H filter. --Bob
If you wanted to purchase an ND Filter would you consider a Graduated ND Filter over a solid ND Filter?
Used for totally different things by most of us. What are you planning on doing with it? I've used GND more than ND, and any rarely. There are also hard and soft transition GNDs too, and various numbers of stops. Can get dizzying.
Used for totally different things by most of us. What are you planning on doing with it? I've used GND more than ND, and any rarely. There are also hard and soft transition GNDs too, and various numbers of stops. Can get dizzying.
Foliage season is coming. have a Polarizer filter and thought I would get some feedback on NDF
If you wanted to purchase an ND Filter would you consider a Graduated ND Filter over a solid ND Filter?
I have a variable ND filter, and been satisfied with its results. Solid ND filters can be stacked for a cumulative effect. More filters equals more expense, and more to carry.
To a degree, what you need in an ND filter does depend on what you'll be shooting. Graduated, single density ND filters are often recommended for landscape shots.