leftj wrote:
Since you don't need to sell it I guess that's why you won't give us your price.
I edited the post and added the price. Look at the header!!
i would have to do some research on your lens. I really was looking for a 2.8 . I already have a 4.0 24-105 L. Thnx
scootersurfs wrote:
i would have to do some research on your lens. I really was looking for a 2.8 . I already have a 4.0 24-105 L. Thnx
12 mm on a full frame is crazy wide, there is almost no distortion once you get to 14mm which is still wider than most ultrawides. Do the research, there is a newer version out there but it is not much of an improvement over the lens I have and it is much more expensive. The only reason I am interested in the trade is because I also have the Canon 16-35 f/4 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8. I had purchased the Sigma for real estate but I went a different direction and never got started, I kept the lens after purchasing the Canon because it was wide enough to use as an ultrawide on my 7D. I no longer have a crop frame camera and the Canon is better suited for landscape because of the ability to use filters. I assume that if you are shooting real estate that you will be using flash and I would think that the wider lens in some situations would be more of an advantage than the faster aperture. Adorama still sells this lens for $950.
http://www.adorama.com/sg12242eos.html
Blurryeyed wrote:
12 mm on a full frame is crazy wide, there is almost no distortion once you get to 14mm which is still wider than most ultrawides. Do the research, there is a newer version out there but it is not much of an improvement over the lens I have and it is much more expensive. The only reason I am interested in the trade is because I also have the Canon 16-35 f/4 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8. I had purchased the Sigma for real estate but I went a different direction and never got started, I kept the lens after purchasing the Canon because it was wide enough to use as an ultrawide on my 7D. I no longer have a crop frame camera and the Canon is better suited for landscape because of the ability to use filters. I assume that if you are shooting real estate that you will be using flash and I would think that the wider lens in some situations would be more of an advantage than the faster aperture. Adorama still sells this lens for $950.
http://www.adorama.com/sg12242eos.html12 mm on a full frame is crazy wide, there is almo... (
show quote)
i don't use flash. I do a basic 3 shot HDR that I merge in Lightroom. No time mapping so the images are really good and I don't need to worry about lighting. I'm in the road in California working so won't have a chance to research your lens until I get back to Utah I'm 10 days. I'm interested but still kinda wanted a 2.8 lens. Thank you and I will be in touch either way.
scootersurfs wrote:
Oversight on my part! Had just listed it on Craig's list with price. So sorry you're offended at this mistake. Wasting time can be fun😎
The price is in the original post title just below the first line of the title
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.