Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Shooting and post process questions
Sep 4, 2017 20:50:00   #
Way2slk Loc: Bluffton SC
 
I shoot a 16 Meg camera and produces a size of 4608x3456 pixels, so do I process full size and then reduce the size to print a 11x14 300dpi. Just a little confused.

Reply
Sep 4, 2017 21:19:05   #
BebuLamar
 
Process it the way you want for color, contrast, brightness etc.. then resize it so that the shorter size it 3300 instead of 3456. You will have an image of 4400 x 3300. Then you will have to crop the long side a bit to make it 4200.

Reply
Sep 4, 2017 21:33:10   #
Way2slk Loc: Bluffton SC
 
Thanks for the help.

Reply
 
 
Sep 5, 2017 05:43:54   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Way2slk wrote:
I shoot a 16 Meg camera and produces a size of 4608x3456 pixels, so do I process full size and then reduce the size to print a 11x14 300dpi. Just a little confused.


I always process at full size and then reduce it, depending on how I'm going to use it. I'm not going to email a 26GB image of a puppy to a friend.

Reply
Sep 5, 2017 06:00:46   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Way2slk wrote:
I shoot a 16 Meg camera and produces a size of 4608x3456 pixels, so do I process full size and then reduce the size to print a 11x14 300dpi. Just a little confused.


You can, but you should take a look at this:

http://www.photokaboom.com/photography/learn/printing/resolution/1_which_resolution_print_size_viewing_distance.htm

you only "need" 156 ppi for 11x14, unless you are giving the print to a pixel peeper or a photographer, in which case you will never have enough resolution, especially once they take out their loupe and start examining the inkjet's dot pattern. You will be fine with anything from 150 ppi to 200 ppi.

One advantage of downsampling is a slight improvement in image quality, especially if the unsampled image has some noise.

The best solution I have found is to use Qimage - which takes care of optimizing your file to your printer, selecting the correct ppi, performing antialising and output sharpening, etc - all with one press of the button.

http://www.ddisoftware.com/qimage-u/

It is money well spent, and your prints will never look as good using any other means. I've been using it for 10 yrs now and have no complaints.

Reply
Sep 5, 2017 09:20:39   #
aaciolkowski Loc: Sugar Grove Illinois
 
Windows only

Reply
Sep 5, 2017 09:52:55   #
Way2slk Loc: Bluffton SC
 
The photo Club I belong to here in Sun City, has contest every month and the submissions are 11 x 14 so I needed to make sure that they are tack Sharp and look good. I consider myself to be pretty damn good in Gimp so I can process just want to make sure that I start from the largest possible resolution and work my way down

Reply
 
 
Sep 5, 2017 12:40:49   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
I decide the size image I want to print. In ACR, I set the crop to accommodate that size image. After a few other ACR adjustments, I'll bring the image into PS and do some additional processing. Then save as both .psd and .jpg.
--Bob
Way2slk wrote:
I shoot a 16 Meg camera and produces a size of 4608x3456 pixels, so do I process full size and then reduce the size to print a 11x14 300dpi. Just a little confused.

Reply
Sep 5, 2017 13:35:39   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
jerryc41 wrote:
I always process at full size and then reduce it, depending on how I'm going to use it. I'm not going to email a 26GB image of a puppy to a friend.


I agree!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.